Skip to main content

Intel reports record fourth quarter earnings

Image used with permission by copyright holder

The world may still be in the throes of a major economic slowdown…but you wouldn’t know it to talk to chipmaking giant Intel: the company has announced record-setting earnings for the fourth quarter of 2010, including net income of $3.4 billion, operating income of $4.3 billion, and overall revenue of $11.5 billion. The numbers not only beat Wall Street estimates for how well the company would perform, but set records for all three financial metrics.

Intel CEO Paul Otellini was succinct in his summary of the results: “2010 was the best year in Intel’s history. We believe that 2011 will be even better.”

Intel’s net income of $3.4 billion is up 15 percent compared to the third quarter of 2010, and up a whopping 48 percent compared to the same quarter a year ago. Although increases in net revenue are more modest—up three percent compared to the previous quarter and eight percent compared to the previous year—operating income so a jump of almost 74 percent compared to a year ago, although up five percent compared to the previous quarter.

The financial results also serve to highlight the shifting nature of Intel’s business. Results for the company’s PC processor business—responsible for CPUs and chipsets used in traditional PCs and notebooks, along with Intel’s Atom line—were flat for the quarter, where Intel’s data center group saw a 15 percent increase in sales compared to the third quarter. Intel also saw increases in purchases from businesses and enterprise, which helped offset decreased purchases in the consumer segment.

Industry watchers expect Intel to benefit from the looming boon in tablet computing, particularly as tablets are adopted by enterprises and large organizations: not only is Intel positioning itself as a leading processor and component developer for tablet devices, but tablets will need to be supported by server infrastructure—and Intel will be right there with Xeon-powered servers. The company expects revenue for the first quarter of 2011 to reach $11.5 billion (±400 million) with gross margins near 64 percent.

Of course, Intel won’t be alone in the tablet market, and faces stiff competition from the broad ARM chip ecosystem, which currently powers a number of tablet and smartphone devices (including the iPad)—and recently got a nod from Microsoft when it announced it plans to bring Windows 8 to ARM-based devices. Intel doesn’t seem to be worried, however, and believes its Atom line of processors can (and does) compete favorably with ARM and MIPS processors in not only embedded systems, but also consumer electronics, smartphones, and tablets.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Intel’s big bet on efficient GPUs might actually work
An Intel Meteor Lake processor socketed in a motherboard.

Intel has a lot riding on its next-gen Battlemage graphics architecture, and a very early benchmark shows some promising signs for performance. An Intel Lunar Lake CPU packing a low-power integrated Battlemage GPU was reportedly spotted in the SiSoftware benchmark database. It boasts not only higher performance than Intel's Meteor Lake chips, but also much better efficiency.

User @miktdt on X (formerly Twitter) spotted the result, which appears to come from an early qualification sample of the HP Spectre x360 14. The benchmark picked up that the laptop was using a Lunar Lake CPU, which is said to come with the Xe2-LPG architecture, a lower-power version of Battlemage.

Read more
I’ve used Intel CPUs for years. Here’s why I’m finally switching to AMD
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D held between fingertips.

I've been using Intel CPUs for close to seven years. It started with the Core i7-8700K, but I moved on to the Core i9-10900K, Core i9-12900K, and most recently, the Core i9-13900K, all of which could have occupied a slot among the best processors at different points in time. But after so much time with Team Blue, I'm switching back to AMD.

It comes at an interesting time for Intel and the PC hardware community as a whole, which is currently abuzz about a particular article claiming that Intel is objectively "better" for PC gamers. That's not what this article is. Instead, I want to walk you through why I chose to use AMD's Ryzen 7 7800X3D in my gaming PC, and how I came to the decision.
Stability struggles
The Intel Core i9-13900K CPU Jacob Roach / Digital Trends / Digital Trends

Read more
Some Intel CPUs lost 9% of their performance almost overnight
Someone holding the Core i9-12900KS processor.

Over the past few weeks, we've seen an increasing number of reports of instability on high-end Intel CPUs like the Core i9-14900K. Asus has released a BIOS update for its Z790 motherboards aimed at addressing the problem, but it carries a performance loss of upwards of 9% in some workloads.

The most recent BIOS update from Asus includes the Intel Baseline Profile. This profile disables various optimizations that are automatically applied on Asus Z790 motherboards and runs high-end Intel chips within Intel's specific limits. Hardwareluxx tested the new profile with the Core i9-14900K and found that the CPU ran around 9% slower in multiple tests.

Read more