Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Mozilla drops ‘Train Model,’ shifts Firefox to a flexible release schedule

Add as a preferred source on Google

Mozilla has announced plans to move its Firefox browser to a flexible release schedule, shifting away from the “Train Model” that is currently in place. It’s expected that the first version of the browser to ship under this new routine will be Firefox 47, which is currently set to ship on June 7.

Version updates will now be released at intervals of six to eight weeks, rather than the present schedule of a new iteration every six weeks. The change brings Firefox in line with the tempo of updates to Google Chrome, as noted in a report from PC World.

Recommended Videos

Previously, Mozilla had stuck to a strict six-week cycle of new updates, which was dubbed the “Train Model” upon its implementation in 2011. While that process proved to be successful enough to stand for several years, it should be noted that even its original announcement carried the caveat that it might be tweaked at any time.

In a blog post announcing the new schedule, Mozilla noted that the company “will now be able to adjust release dates to respond to emerging user and market needs and provide at least six working weeks for every release.”

Among other advantages, a flexible schedule will allow Mozilla to better cater to its staff and users around holidays. The prior system had been disrupted by Christmas, New Year, and other celebrations, which had sometimes caused Firefox to deviate from its mandated six-week pattern.

Mozilla has pledged to deliver the same amount of releases over a calendar year as would have been distributed under the previous schedule, but its published plans for 2016 don’t seem to line up with that statement. At present, seven numbered iterations are set for release this year, compared to the nine that came out in 2015.

Brad Jones
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
I spent a fortune on a Copilot+ PC, and I’ve barely ever touched Microsoft’s AI
Microsoft needs to give Copilot+ PC owners a reason to use Copilot
Copilot

There is a dedicated Copilot key on my ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED. Months after buying the laptop, it may be one of the least important keys on the entire keyboard. My Zenbook UM3406 runs on AMD’s Ryzen AI 300 series processor, complete with a dedicated NPU offering up to 50 TOPS of AI performance. That qualifies it as a Copilot+ PC, which makes it a part of what Microsoft once described as the new era for Windows.

AI is already a regular part of my workday. I use it for research, brainstorming, and working through ideas. But rather than relying on something built into the Windows OS, I've relied on the likes of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

Read more
I bought into a brighter future, but my digital life bills monthly subscriptions
My day runs on streaming, cloud storage, AI, transport, and smart devices. None of it feels expensive until I realize almost nothing is ever fully paid for
Light, Adult, Female

Before I’ve properly started the day, several companies have already clocked in. Spotify or YouTube Premium handles the music, Google One keeps my files available, and an AI subscription is waiting in another tab to help me work faster.

Most of these charges earn their place. They save time, remove friction, and keep the day moving. I barely notice them until I think about what would stop working if one payment didn’t go through.

Read more
What happens when AI detectors fail? Researchers say we must be trained to spot fake AI faces
Researchers say spotting AI faces may soon depend more on people than software
Zuckerberg Deepfake

Artificial intelligence has become remarkably good at creating fake human faces. So good, in fact, that the old tricks people relied on - counting fingers, spotting warped earrings, or looking for distorted backgrounds - are quickly becoming obsolete. According to a new study highlighted by the BBC, the next line of defence may not be a better AI detector at all. It might simply be a better-trained human.

Researchers from the University of Aberdeen, working alongside Australia's National University, found that people can dramatically improve their ability to distinguish AI-generated faces from real ones after a relatively short period of structured training. Instead of hunting for obvious visual glitches, participants were taught to recognise subtle patterns that modern image generators still struggle to replicate consistently.

Read more