Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Nvidia bringing CUDA platform to x86 processors

Add as a preferred source on Google
Image used with permission by copyright holder

For years, rumors have been circulating that graphics developer Nvidia might start making its own x86-compatible systems—perhaps not for mainstream computers (at first), but for high-end graphics systems and supercomputing applications. Now, Nvidia has announced it is taking a step into the x86 world—but it’s not building its own processors. Instead, the company has announced the Portland Group (PGI), a consulting subsidiary of STMicro, is developing a CUDA C compiler that will enable CUDA applications to run in industry-standard x86 processors—no Nvidia hardware required.

The compiler will enable developers developing CUDA applications—which tap into the massively parallel processing capabilities in Nvidia graphics hardware—to deploy their applications to standard x86 processors from the likes of Intel and AMD. Although this move probably doesn’t have any tremendous impact for gamers—who will still need graphics hardware to push all those pixels to their displays—the move could have significant ramifications for programmers making parallel computing applications that need to be deployed on servers and computing clusters that do not have Nvidia graphics hardware installed. Instead, the applications will be able to tap into multicore processors from Intel and AMD for executing parallel tasks—maybe not as much parallel oomph as Nvidia hardware, but that’s better than not being able to run at all.

Recommended Videos

“In less than three years, CUDA has become the most widely used massively parallel programming model,” said Nvidia CPU computing general manager Sanford Russell, in a statement. “With the CUDA for x86 CPU compiler, PGI is responding to the need of developers who want to use a single parallel programming model to target many core GPUs and multi-core CPUs.”

CUDA has developed a significant following supercomputing application developers: Nvidia launched the CUDA development platform in 2007 as one of its first major steps into supercomputing. The non-proprietary alternative to CUDA is the more recent OpenCL, which by most accounts still has to catch up to CUDA in technical capabilities as well as adoption by developers of high-performance applications. CUDA also faces competition from Microsoft’s DirectCompute, an API in Windows Vista and Windows 7 that enables developers to leverage the parallel processing capabilities of Nvidia graphics hardware.

Extending the CUDA platform to x86 processors not only broadens the hardware that can run CUDA applications, it also lowers the barriers to getting started writing CUDA apps: with an x86 compiler, any developer with a standard Intel or AMD processor can at least get started.

None of this rules out the notion that Nvidia might develop its own x86 processors. Intel has increasingly worked to hamstring the discrete graphics market, with its forthcoming Sandy Bridge CPUs integrating graphics controllers, making it impossible for system makers to build computers that don’t include Intel graphics. At a certain point, Nvidia may decide it’s better off making its own processors rather than being held captive to the Intels and AMDs of the world.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
DigUp lets users find Mac files by describing them, not remembering their names
Can't remember where that screenshot, PDF or recording went? Just describe it and let AI do the digging.
DigUp App in Use screenshot

There's a particular kind of frustration that comes with knowing a file exists somewhere on a computer but having absolutely no idea what it's called. Was that screenshot saved as IMG_4837? Which PDF contained that clause? And where did that podcast recording mention the thing worth remembering? DigUp wants to end the filename guessing game, letting Mac users search for files by describing what they remember instead. The free, open-source app uses Google's EmbeddingGemma 2 to search across photos, documents, PDFs, audio recordings and videos, all without sending personal files to the cloud.

DigUp turns everyday descriptions into file searches

Read more
A new AI detector looks beyond words to check whether the ideas came from AI
This could help journals distinguish AI-written research from human work polished with AI.
ai-writing-book

Most AI detectors look for telltale signs of AI-generated text by examining word and sentence patterns. A new tool called IdeaLens takes a different route to solving this problem. It spots AI-generated research by looking at the ideas behind it instead of the wording itself (via TechXplore).

Researchers from the University of Maryland, Google DeepMind, and Simon Fraser University built IdeaLens to check whether a document's core arguments came from a human or a machine, regardless of who wrote the final draft.

Read more
Anthropic warns of imminent self-replicating AI that might even work off an oven or TV
Self-replicating AI could be merely months away, and tests show it can run on the devices sitting at your home.
Illustration of dangerous AI.

Over the past few weeks, nearly every AI lab has released frontier AI models. Earlier today, Google started rolling out Gemini 4, Argon, hot on the heels of Meta announcing its Muse Wonder frontier AI models to compete against the best from OpenAI and Anthropic's Claude. This relentless pace of AI model release comes at a time when the same AI labs are calling for development slowdown and increased regulation, following a series of concerning incidents where these AI models went rogue and broke into private, as well as government-owned, websites.

Now, Anthropic has dropped a chilling set of predictions about the capabilities of these AI models after running a series of tests. The company claims that small AI models could be merely a few months away from self-replicating and turning into a dangerous swarm. More importantly, they won't require a massive data center or an uber-powerful computer to do so. On the contrary, the lab claims that these self-replicating AI swarms will need something with as little computing power as an average Internet-connected device, like a smart oven or an Android TV box.

Read more