Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Gaming
  4. News

The sixth generation of on-board memory for GPU cards won’t arrive until 2018

Add as a preferred source on Google

During the ISCA 2016 convention in Seoul, Korea, Samsung revealed that the sixth generation of on-board memory for video cards won’t make an appearance until sometime around 2018. A previous rumor pointed at 2016 as a possible release date, but that turned out to be incorrect, as memory chip maker Micron was working on an updated version of fifth-generation memory chips, not the next generational release.

Called GDDR6, it stands for Graphics Double Data Rate (DDR), a type of Synchronous Dynamic Random-Access Memory (SDRAM) that’s designed specifically for a graphics processor. Because of this, you’ll only see GDDR packed on video cards by Nvidia, AMD, and their partners, and not installed as memory used by the overall system (aka DDR). Unlike memory sticks, GDDR is compact and spread out around the GPU to take up the least amount of physical space as possible on a graphics card.

Recommended Videos

According to one of the slides presented during the show, GDDR6 will offer more than 14 gigabits (Gb) per second of bandwidth, beating out the most recent GDDR5X Micron launched earlier this year with a bandwidth of up to 12Gb per second, and the 10Gb per second offered by vanilla GDDR5 memory. Bandwidth is essentially a term used for describing the speed between the on-board memory and the graphics chip.

GDDR is attached to the graphics card via soldered pins. Samsung is not only aiming to increase the gigabits per second performance through each pin via each generational release, but to decrease the power draw from the memory chips in the process. GDDR5 managed a 40 to 60 percent in power efficiency compared to GDDR4, and GDDR6 is expected to be even more power efficient when it launches in 2018.

Ultimately, all of this means squeezing better performance out of graphics cards. As graphics chips get faster, the on-board memory need to do the same. The graphics chip uses this local memory to temporarily store huge textures, computations, and more in close proximity rather than sending all of that data to the system memory located miles away within the desktop or laptop.

However, if you ask AMD, GDDR simply can’t keep up with the evolution of the graphics processor. According to the company, GDDR limits the overall device form factor because a large number of GDDR chips are required for a high bandwidth. The more chips you throw on the graphics card, the more power that card consumes even though each generation of GDDR is more power efficient than the last.

Thus, enter AMD’s approach to local video memory: High-Bandwidth Memory, or HBM, launched in 2015. Rather than spreading memory chips around the graphics processor as seen with GDDR, HBM features stacked chips that are interconnected by columns of microscopic wires. Because of this, data goes up or down the elevator shafts to the appropriate floor, whereas GDDR data drives through streets looking for an open memory chip to occupy.

SK Hynix reportedly attended the same convention showcasing the second generation of HBM memory. The company said that HBM2 will expand into three markets: High Performance Computing and Servers, Networking and Graphics, and Client Desktops and Notebooks. Graphics cards will see HBM2 served up in “cubes” of up to 4GB while the HPC/server/networking markets will see capacities of up to 8GB. HBM2 is expected to be supported by AMD’s new “Vega” graphics core architecture slated for a 2017 release.

Finally, there was also talk at the show about HBM3, which will reportedly be supported by AMD’s “Navi” graphics core architecture slated for a 2019/2020 release. A slide provided by Samsung showed that HBM3 will have double the bandwidth and even more stacks than the previous generation.

Kevin Parrish
Kevin started taking PCs apart in the 90s when Quake was on the way and his PC lacked the required components. Since then…
Windows 11’s latest update has become a gamble for gamers
KB5121003 is crashing The Finals for some players, while Microsoft still lists no known issues with the update
Three masked soldiers in a pink mist.

Windows 11’s August update is becoming a risky install for some gamers. Windows 11 update problems are hardly new, but KB5121003 has now been linked to crashes in The Finals, and developer Embark has already published troubleshooting steps for players who run into them.

Embark traced the problem to inpoutx64.sys, a third-party driver that can conflict with the update. Its workaround removes the troublesome driver while leaving KB5121003 itself installed, which is a much better option than rolling back the whole update.

Read more
NVIDIA delivers 10,000 H200 chips to Chinese ByteDance and Tencent, more to follow
NVIDIA H200 chips are now reaching Chinese AI companies
Nvidia logo

ByteDance and Tencent have reportedly begun receiving shipments of NVIDIA's H200 artificial intelligence chips in China, marking a significant development in the technology rivalry between Beijing and Washington.

According to the Financial Times, both companies have received around 10,000 H200 processors each over the past few weeks after China allowed the chips to enter the mainland. The shipments could give two of China's largest technology companies additional computing power to train advanced AI models and develop AI agents capable of competing with leading U.S. systems.

Read more
Framework’s cheapest laptop just got serious about taking on the MacBook Neo
Framework Laptop 12 is back, and it brings some Wild Cat power
Framework Laptop 12 in bright color options

The MacBook Neo made the budget laptop segment a lot more competitive overnight. Apple showed that you can get more for just a few hundred dollars. This had Windows laptop brands scrambling to drop worthy competitors, and Framework's cheapest notebook is also swinging back now.

Back in May, YouTuber Jeff Geerling compared the original Framework Laptop 12 directly against Apple’s budget MacBook. Apple's laptop turned out faster, quieter, more efficient, better built, and equipped with a better display. While Framework had repairability, upgradeability, a touchscreen, and its 360-degree hinge on its side, the Neo still beat it out in terms of sheer value.

Read more