Skip to main content

Study: digital piracy Websites get 53 billion visits a year


The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has released findings from a study by MarkMonitor, a brand protection firm. The study perused the Web for sites hosting illegal copies of 10 major digital brands (movies, music, etc) and found that 43 major sites that sold digital pirated goods generated more than 146 million visits every day. That’s about 53 billion visits a year.

More interesting, visits to digital pirating sites in one day (146 million) are greater than an entire year’s worth of combined visits to counterfeited physical goods (87 million) and counterfeit prescription drugs (51 million).

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce isn’t too happy about the news. “Whether it is the sale of counterfeit bags and fake pharmaceuticals or illegal distribution of movies, music, and software, online IP theft is theft—plain and simple,” said Steve Tepp, senior director of Internet counterfeiting and piracy for the Global Intellectual Property Center at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. “Rogue websites have no place in a legitimate online market. If left unchecked, these sites will continue to flourish at our expense and further hinder our economic growth. The MarkMonitor report underscores the urgency of enacting proactive policies to enhance enforcement tools to shut down these rogue websites.”

So, what’s the deal?

The publication of this ‘study’ is suspicious. It comes as the U.S. Gov’t has been ramping up action against pirating Websites and Congressional lawmakers have been trying to pass COICA, a law that would allow the Gov’t to more easily seize domains and take action against sites it deems pirate friendly.

If these numbers are right, we all must be pirates. I mean 53 billion visits, that’s a lot. Of course, it gives us no indication about how many actual people are pirating. There is also no evidence that any of the 53 billion visits equated to an illegal download. Does staring at a stolen good make you a criminal? On top of that, we don’t know if someone who downloads, say, a Britney Spears album on a “digital piracy” site would have ever paid $15 to buy the music in the first place. Digital album sales were up in 2010, by the way.

Editors' Recommendations

German court: Rat out your adult children’s illegal downloads, or pay the fine yourself
Apple Music

Your little rascals are your responsibility, even after they're not so little, a German court rules, and that applies in every sense of the word. In this digital age, there are quite a few senses, perhaps the most costly being our kiddos' penchant for downloading computer games ... illegally. Late last week, the European nation's top court determined that parents must either spill the beans on their adult children's wrongdoings when it comes to illegal downloads, or pay the price themselves.

The decision, which places obligation to the law above obligation to family, came after a particular case in which members of the same clan said that being related to one another meant that they wouldn't have to testify against each other. Germany has now voiced its disagreement. Moving forward, parents are under a legal obligation to alert authorities if their kids have illegally downloaded content -- be it movies, music, or games -- over the family's internet connection.

Read more
Tech support scams are getting more sophisticated, says new study
tech support scams malwarebytes call center

Tech support scams are becoming more common and the criminals perpetrating them are becoming more sophisticated, according to a new report by security firm Malwarebytes.

Tech support scams began to rise in prominence in 2008 with cold calls to random numbers. Scammers pretending to be Microsoft technicians would try to convince targets that their computers were infected and faulty and that the technicians needed to take control of the machines to fix them. Since then their techniques have become much more nuanced.

Read more
U.S. government remains committed to its fight to gain access to overseas data
microsoft sues us government gag orders mem 2

Privacy remains one of the more bitterly debated aspects of technology -- and not just in terms of criminals gaining access to personal or proprietary business information using nefarious means. Increasingly, the question of government access to the same information has become a controversial issue, and Microsoft has been spearheading a fight with the U.S. government over access to information stored on servers located in other countries.

In July 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that while the Stored Communications Act does indeed allow the U.S. government to demand access to information stored on servers located on U.S. soil, information stored on servers overseas is off limits without going through the relevant local legal process. Nevertheless, the U.S. government hasn't given up on its fight to gain access to that data, and asked the appellate court on Thursday to reconsider its decision, as Ars Technica reports.

Read more