Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Gaming
  4. News

Ubisoft claims consoles did not hamstring The Division on PC

Add as a preferred source on Google

Although it’s still more common to see cross-platform releases look better on PC than on consoles, a quick look at PC-only titles like the upcoming Star Citizen shows that without that console anchor, developers can do some amazing things. However when it comes to The Division, Ubisoft is adamant that making it compatible with consoles did not crimp the PC version one iota.

The reason it felt the need to respond at all is because an unnamed developer on the game purportedly said in an interview that they had to “keep things in check with the consoles,” when it came to making the game. The implication was that this was done so that the game did not look drastically better on PC and make console gamers feel like they were missing out.

Recommended Videos

This is all bunkum according to Ubisoft. “It is simply not true” that the visuals of The Division were held back by current-gen consoles, a spokesperson said (via PCGamer).

“From the beginning, the PC version of The Division was developed from the ground up and we’re confident players will enjoy the game and the features this version has to offer. And the feedback from PC players who participated in the recent closed beta supports this.”

Taking these assertions at face value, it would seem that the PC version was built from the ground up to be roughly in line with the specifications of the new-gen consoles, to ensure that everyone was happy. That is certainly preferable to a PC version being deliberately hamstrung during development.

It’s also par for the course with developments these days. If a game is being made for all platforms, it will probably look worse than if it was just made for the PC.

As it happens, Ubisoft is facing a more pressing and immediate problem with The Division right now, caused by cheating that is occurring in The Division’s beta. Here’s hoping Ubisoft can fix that before it launches in one month’s time.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale covers how to guides, best-of lists, and explainers to help everyone understand the hottest new hardware and…
Apple’s 2026 Back to School promo saves you up to $150 on a new Mac or iPad
The exact amount depends on which device you buy, but the offer doesn't apply to all Mac and iPad models.
Apple Back to School 2026 featured

Apple has kicked off its 2026 Back to School promotion, and this year's offer swaps out the free accessory bundle from last year with gift cards. Eligible buyers who purchase a MacBook Pro get a $150 gift card, while a MacBook Air, iPad Pro, or iPad Air earns a $100 gift card. The promotion runs through August 27 in the US, with international versions rolling out on different timelines and, in some regions, different rewards entirely.

Not every device is eligible

Read more
OpenAI made a tiny $230 keyboard that lets you turn up an AI’s brainpower
The Codex Micro puts reasoning settings, agent status lights, and programmable AI shortcuts directly on your desk
Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

OpenAI has made a $230 mini keyboard that lets Codex users adjust how hard its AI thinks with a physical dial. The Codex Micro also provides dedicated buttons for launching workflows and checking on active agents without bouncing between chats.

Developed with keyboard maker Work Louder, the compact Mac and Windows accessory connects over Bluetooth or USB-C. OpenAI’s store currently lists it as out of stock, although the company says more units are coming.

Read more
Google rejects alarming report that says its Search AI tools are unsafe for kids
The company says it couldn’t reproduce many of the responses cited and argues that the testing doesn’t reliably measure product safety
Google AI Mode on mobile and desktop

Google has rejected a new report that labels its AI-powered Search features an “unacceptable risk” for children and teenagers.

Common Sense Media’s Youth AI Safety Institute gave AI Overviews and AI Mode its lowest overall rating. The two tools performed poorly against seven of the institute’s eight AI safety principles and failed every category involving potentially severe harm. Google says those findings came from searches that don’t resemble how people normally use its products.

Read more