Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Zoom lays off 15% of its workforce, citing ‘mistakes’

Add as a preferred source on Google

Zoom is cutting its workforce by 15%, equal to about 1,300 jobs at the company.

The online videoconferencing firm began business in 2011 but experienced a massive boost in business in 2020 as the pandemic prompted an uptick in working from home.

Recommended Videos

In a blog post announcing the layoffs, Zoom CEO Eric Yuan noted that the California-headquartered company “needed to staff up rapidly” during the early days of COVID-19, with its staff count tripling in size to deal with the increased demand.

But Yuan added that his company had made mistakes as it “didn’t take as much time as we should have to thoroughly analyze our teams or assess if we were growing sustainably, toward the highest priorities.”

He said that while people and businesses continue to rely on Zoom, “the uncertainty of the global economy, and its effect on our customers, means we need to take a hard — yet important — look inward to reset ourselves so we can weather the economic environment, deliver for our customers, and achieve Zoom’s long-term vision.”

U.S.-based Zoom staff who are losing their positions at the company will receive up to 16 weeks’ salary and healthcare coverage, as well as bonus payments based on company performance. Those outside the U.S. will receive similar support, though it may vary slightly according to local laws.

Yuan said that as the CEO and founder of Zoom, he feels accountable for the company’s recent mistakes and so he will cut his salary for the coming fiscal year by 98% and forego his annual bonus. Members of Zoom’s executive leadership team, too, will reduce their base salaries by 20% for the coming fiscal year and will also not take their bonuses.

Zoom’s layoffs are just the latest in a tech industry impacted by challenging economic conditions. Just a few days ago, for example, computer giant Dell said it was laying off 6,650 people, and before that Microsoft, Google, Meta, and Amazon, among others, all announced significant reductions to their staff counts.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
The Mac Pro nearly received an M3 Extreme chip twice as powerful as M3 Ultra
High production costs likely killed Apple’s M3 Extreme plans
Apple's Mac Pro on a table at a press event.

Apple discontinued the Mac Pro earlier this year, ending a 20-year run for a computer that once represented the very best of the company’s desktop lineup. However, Apple reportedly had much bigger plans for the machine before ultimately replacing it with the Mac Studio.

According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, Apple developed an M3 Extreme chip that could have offered twice as many CPU and GPU cores as the M3 Ultra. The processor was intended to sit above the Ultra tier and could have finally given the Mac Pro the performance advantage it badly needed. Apple eventually abandoned the chip due to concerns over production costs and limited demand for such an expensive machine.

Read more
Hidden prompts can secretly rewrite an AI’s memory, and researchers say that’s a serious problem
Researchers discover AI attack that rewrites an assistant's long-term memory
Chatbot on a smartphone.

Large language models are getting better at remembering us. Whether it's your preferred writing style, recurring tasks, shopping habits or project deadlines, AI assistants are increasingly storing long-term memories to make future conversations feel more personal and useful. But according to new research, that same feature could become one of AI's biggest security vulnerabilities.

Researchers from New Mexico State University have demonstrated a new attack called GhostWriter, capable of secretly planting false memories inside AI agents. Rather than stealing information outright, the attack manipulates what an AI remembers, potentially causing it to make dangerous decisions long after the original attack has taken place.

Read more
This experiment shows how easy it is to poison an open-weight AI model for under $100
This research raises new doubts about trusting open weight AI models.
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Open-weight AI models have been having a moment lately. Just this month, Moonshot's massive Kimi K3 model landed close behind Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol in several benchmarks, all while remaining fully open-weight and downloadable by anyone.

However, Katie Paxton-Fear, a cybersecurity lecturer at Manchester Metropolitan University and staff security advocate at Semgrep, managed to poison an open-weight model and proved how easily that openness can be turned against you (via The Register).

Read more