Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Opinion
  4. Features

Where’s the green? CES 2020 was surprisingly low on environmental tech

Add as a preferred source on Google

Oftentimes the most insightful part of CES isn’t what was on the show floor — it’s what was missing from it. The convention draws exhibitors from all over the globe, and it’s stuffed with just about every type of technology you can imagine. But for the past few years (and in particular in 2020), one particular category of tech has been notably hidden at the show: Environmental tech.

Sure, there were a few sustainability-focused exhibitors scattered throughout the show floor this year, and some of the technologies on display do have environmental benefits (see: electric vehicles). Heck, there was even a small panel about renewable energy at one point. Green tech did admittedly have a small presence at CES 2020 — but it was exactly that: Small. In fact, it was so small that it was practically invisible amid the sea of shiny new gadgets and screens.

LG Booth CES 2020
Mario Tama/Getty Images

This is problematic. Anthropogenic climate change is quite literally the biggest, most pressing problem facing humanity right now, and technology plays an instrumental role in helping us fix that problem. Yet at the Consumer Electronics Show — the largest technology expo in the world — environmental technologies are hardly even a blip on the radar. It could be stuffed full of solar, wind tech, and startups aimed at replacing plastic — but these kinds of eco-minded innovations are few and far between at CES.

On one level, this isn’t surprising. After all, it’s called the consumer electronics show — so it’s fundamentally designed to promote consumption, not environmentalism. But on another level, it’s puzzling. CES is all about the technologies that will help us build a better future, so it’s strange that innovations that address climate change are so scarce at the show. Planet-saving tech should be at center stage, but it isn’t.

fietseventiel / 123RF Stock Photo

Part of this is because the Consumer Technology Association (the organization that runs CES) doesn’t choose who exhibits at the show. It doesn’t go out and pick specific companies or technologies for the expo, or go out of its way to invite anyone in particular. The exhibitors that end up at the show are the ones that pay to be there of their own volition, so the dearth of greentech companies at CES 2020 partially reflects a lack of attendance and interest in the show. But that’s not the only thing that’s going on here.

Another part of the problem is a structural one. There are always a few dozen environmental tech exhibitors at CES every year, but the way the show is organized effectively makes them invisible. The CTA doesn’t bundle envirotech companies together and give them a dedicated zone at the convention center, like it does for things like smart home, 3D printing, digital money, and a variety of other categories it deems significant enough to warrant highlighting. Instead, the show’s greentech exhibitors are scattered across the expo and therefore don’t have a unified presence. So, if you aren’t seeking these companies out specifically, you won’t find them. You’ll skip right past them and they’ll be lost among the ocean of other tech on display.

The good news is that these problems could easily be fixed. All the CTA needs to do is make environmental tech more of a focus at CES in the future. It doesn’t have the power to determine who attends the show, but it does have the ability to highlight certain things — and greentech should absolutely be one of those things in 2021 and beyond. Giving environmental tech a spotlight would not only help give those companies the exposure they need to thrive, but also demonstrate to other greentech companies that attending CES is worthwhile. You reap what you sow, and in this case, sowing the seeds of environmental innovation might be as simple as reshuffling the show floor.

Drew Prindle
Former Senior Editor, Features
Drew Prindle is an award-winning writer, editor, and storyteller who currently serves as Senior Features Editor for Digital…
AI can’t tell if you’re gay or straight, but it thinks it knows what both look like
AI knows it shouldn't judge a face, but apparently, drawing one is a different story.
Emilia Clarke AI generated stock image. Gemini / Nano Banana is on the left

We've all been told not to judge a book by its cover, and you'd think AI would follow that rule, too. Ask an AI chatbot to guess someone's sexual orientation just by looking at their face, and it'll likely tell you that there's no reliable way to know. But what happens when you ask that same model to change someone's appearance to match a particular sexual orientation? Well, that's where things get uncomfortable.

A new study, accepted for presentation at the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, found that AI models from OpenAI and Google can be inconsistent when handling sensitive personal characteristics. They might refuse to make assumptions about someone based on their appearance, but when asked to generate those same assumptions visually, the results tell a very different story.

Read more
A clinical study with Google’s special chatbot shows a strong future for AI in healthcare
Google’s medical AI could give doctors a useful second set of eyes
Google Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer chatbot

AI is a useful tool for handling many tasks in private as well as professional settings, but medical advice, especially diagnosis, is one area where I generally draw the line. General-purpose chatbots tend to sound confident and convincing while giving medical advice, even when they are wrong, as studies have previously found.

That being said, Google's new research points to a much more convincing use for AI in healthcare. Its Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer chatbot, or AMIE for short, could help prepare both sides before the appointment even begins.

Read more
Relaxation music had one job in this pain study, and favorite songs did it better
Patients who chose their music reported less pain after an IV insertion
Book, Publication, Indoors

Patients’ favorite songs helped ease pain after an IV insertion in a new study, while music specifically chosen for relaxation didn’t show a significant benefit. The soothing soundtrack could apparently use a second opinion.

Researchers at University Hospital Zürich studied 204 patients receiving an IV cannula before an MRI scan. Those listening to their chosen music reported less pain 30 seconds and two minutes after insertion. Across the full sample, the clearest relief came after the needle went in.

Read more