Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Recovery of da Vinci’s DNA could be key to confirming his burial site

Add as a preferred source on Google

Leonardo da Vinci died in 1519 but his burial site remains a mystery. Researchers hope to recover da Vinci’s DNA from a painting currently being restored, according to SkyNews. The hope is to confirm his grave and, by studying da Vinci’s DNA and surviving relatives, to learn more about extraordinarily creative people.

Human remains currently at the Chateau d’Amboise in the Loire Valley may be da Vinci’s, but that opinion lacks certainty. Scientists from the J. Craig Venter Institute in California are going to attempt to retrieve hair and bits of skin from notebooks and paintings. The institute, which specializes in genetic research and genome sequencing, will compare DNA the scientists retrieve with samples from the remains at Chateau d’Amboise and with samples from da Vinci’s descendants. They will also use DNA from da Vinci’s parents’ graves. If everything matches, that will lock down the question of da Vinci’s burial site.

Recommended Videos

The initial DNA retrieval efforts will be performed using da Vinci’s painting The Adoration of the Magi, which is currently being restored in Florence, Italy.

Once the researchers are confident they have da Vinci’s DNA, they plan to use genetic analysis to reconstruct his face shape, skin tone, and eye and hair color. Measurements of his descendants’ skulls will help determine the shape of da Vinci’s skull, which will further help re-create da Vinci actual appearance.

The Venter Institute is working with the International Institute for Humankind Studies at the University of Florence.”We stand to gain not only greater historical knowledge of Leonardo but possibly a reconstruction of his genetic profile, which could provide insights into other individuals with remarkable qualities,” said  Brunetto Chiarelli from the IIHS.

Bruce Brown
Bruce Brown Contributing Editor   As a Contributing Editor to the Auto teams at Digital Trends and TheManual.com, Bruce…
After a week with Gemini Notebook on my Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, I can’t imagine using it on a slab phone
Computer, Electronics, Screen

Gemini Notebook has become one of the apps I use more than almost anything else. Whether I'm researching for a feature, studying for hours, or trying to make sense of a stack of PDFs, it's almost always open somewhere on my phone. Over the past years, I've used it on just about every kind of device imaginable, but one thing kept bothering me. It never really felt like a notebook.

Don't get me wrong — it worked perfectly well on a regular phone. All the features were there, and I never felt like I was missing anything. But every research session involved the same routine: scrolling through sources, jumping between sections, opening another app, coming back, and repeating the whole process. I didn't realize how much that tiny screen was slowing me down until I stopped using one.

Read more
ChatGPT Pro replaced Gemini Notebook as my favorite research app, and I didn’t see it coming
Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

I've been using Gemini Notebook ever since it launched, and for the longest time, it was my go-to app for just about everything. Whether I was researching a topic, organizing work, or studying something new, it became one of those apps I instinctively opened without thinking. When Google kept adding new features, I genuinely believed it had secured a permanent spot in my workflow.

Then, almost without realizing it, ChatGPT Pro took over. I've been using its Work mode for a while now, and somewhere along the way, it replaced Gemini Notebook. Of course, it wasn't an overnight switch. I kept bouncing between the two for weeks, but I gradually found myself reaching for ChatGPT every single time instead. At some point, I realized I hadn't opened Gemini Notebook in days. Now, I honestly don't use it at all.

Read more
AI chatbots will happily create fake news articles, and tests show ChatGPT is the worst at it
Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

The biggest AI chatbots are supposed to help people find information, not manufacture misinformation. But a new investigation suggests that separating those two jobs isn't as straightforward as many AI companies would like users to believe. A series of tests found that several leading AI chatbots, including ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, and Meta AI, could be persuaded to generate fake news stories, fabricated headlines, and even realistic-looking screenshots of well-known media outlets. While every chatbot showed some weaknesses, ChatGPT reportedly performed the worst, producing the most convincing fake content with surprisingly little effort.

The findings come from an investigation by German newsroom CORRECTIV, which tested how the AI assistants responded when asked to create false reports involving sensitive topics such as election fraud, government coups, war, vaccines, climate change, and conspiracy theories.

Read more