Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Web
  4. News

FAA’s proposed drone rules put Amazon’s Prime Air plans in jeopardy

Add as a preferred source on Google

Jeff Bezos’s dream of using drones to deliver goods to Amazon customers received a setback Sunday when the Federal Aviation Administration announced proposed rules for the commercial operation of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) in the U.S.

Among the proposals affecting the Amazon boss’s ambitious plan to fly books, gadgets and clothes to customers is the necessity for drones to stay within eyesight of the operator at all times, and the banning of flights over people who have no connection with the drone’s operation.

Recommended Videos

Keen for the FAA to adopt a more lenient stance, Paul Misener, Amazon’s vice-president of global public policy, said in a statement that the administration “needs to begin and expeditiously complete the formal process to address the needs of our business, and ultimately our customers.”

He added that Amazon is still committed to its Prime Air plan and is “prepared to deploy where we have the regulatory support we need,” meaning the e-commerce will be looking at locations outside of the U.S. to get its drone delivery service off the ground. Frustrated with the current restrictions on drone flights, Amazon has already taken some of its development work to the UK.

Prohibitive

The prohibitive rules won’t come as a major surprise to Bezos, who said at the time of Prime Air’s unveiling just over a year ago that regulatory issues presented the biggest challenge for the service’s launch.

However, the FAA’s initial set of guidelines are only proposals, and even if they do pass into law, Amazon – as well as other companies hoping to offer a similar service – will be hoping that over time the rules and regulations loosen as the technology’s safety improves and the population becomes more comfortable with the presence of UAVs in the skies.

Other proposals listed in the framework of regulations include daylight-only flights at an altitude of no more than 500 feet. The proposed maximum speed has been set at 100 mph, while machines should be no heavier than 55 pounds (25 kg). In addition, drone operators would have to pass an aeronautical knowledge test at an FAA-approved testing center, be vetted by the Transportation Security Administration, pass additional tests every two years, and be at least 17 years of age.

The FAA is now inviting comments from the public on the proposals, and will also set up a number of public meetings on the issue. Only when the consultation period is over and all opinions have been evaluated will the proposals go into effect, so commercial operators could be waiting for at least another year before they can get started with their drone-based work.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
OpenAI admits it needs to rethink what happens when AI goes rogue
As increasingly capable AI agents move beyond controlled tests, OpenAI is confronting a difficult question: When does strange model behavior become an incident the public deserves to know about?
OpenAI logo on blurred background

OpenAI has spent plenty of time explaining how it plans to stop increasingly capable AI agents from doing things they shouldn't. Now, the company says it needs to get better at telling everyone when those things have already happened. The admission follows reports of another previously undisclosed incident involving OpenAI's AI agents, this time affecting a German-language programming wiki. According to Reuters, agents made more than 15,000 unauthorized edits to DseWiki, using the site to communicate and share ways to bypass restrictions, cheat on tasks, and avoid detection.

OpenAI has now acknowledged what it calls the "wiki incident" and says the episode exposed a larger problem with how AI companies disclose unexpected model behavior. The company says it is developing a framework for deciding when and how to make incidents involving misaligned AI public.

Read more
AI has a safety problem nobody is ready for
AI safety efforts are ramping up, but their protections don’t work equally well everywhere. In developing countries, language gaps and cultural blind spots can turn everyday AI mistakes into serious real-world consequences.
Logo, Hockey, Ice Hockey

AI companies are spending an enormous amount of time worrying about what happens when their models become too capable. OpenAI even took the unusual step of temporarily pausing training on a model last month over safety concerns, as the industry grapples with risks ranging from autonomous behavior to increasingly sophisticated cyber capabilities.

But there’s another AI safety problem that is much easier to overlook: the protections already being built into these systems don’t necessarily work equally well for everyone. A new report from Rest of World highlights how AI safety efforts remain heavily centered around the needs of wealthier, English-speaking countries. That can leave people in parts of Asia, Africa, and other developing regions dealing with problems as basic and potentially dangerous as a chatbot misunderstanding their language.

Read more
The IFA 2026 Publisher Award Winners Bring Fresh Ideas to Everyday Tech
From Smarter Entry to Screen-Free Wellness, These IFA 2026 Winners Do Things Differently
IFA 2026 Publisher Awards

IFA is the kind of event where almost every corner promises the next big thing in tech. Some ideas are ambitious, others are surprisingly simple, and a few make you wonder why nobody thought of them sooner. But among hundreds of new products, the most memorable ones usually have something more going for them than novelty alone.

This year’s IFA Publisher Award winners are a good example. They span everything from smart entry and personal wellness to coffee, floor care, and big-screen entertainment. What connects them is how they take technology in interesting new directions while keeping its purpose grounded in how people actually use it.

Read more