Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Legacy Archives

US gov’t video shows why 3D-printing your own gun is a bad idea

Add as a preferred source on Google

If you think that 3D-printed plastic firearms are dangerous, the U.S. government has something to tell you: You’re right!

At a press event on Wednesday, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) announced that it built its own 3D-printed version of the Liberator handgun, which was designed and tested earlier this year by University of Texas at Austin law student Cody Wilson. ATF used plans for the Liberator that are widely available online for anyone to download. From there, they printed up the firearm, and let ‘er rip.

Recommended Videos

Based on ATF’s tests, the Liberator is dangerous for two reasons. The first, of course, is that it fires 0.380 caliber ammunition with enough force to do serious damage.

“The bottom line is, the penetration results demonstrated that the Liberator is a lethal weapon,” Earl Griffith, chief of ATF’s firearms technology division, told reporters. “The .380 bullets fired from the Liberator penetrate sufficiently to reach vital organs and perforate the skull.”

Okay, you might be saying to yourself, but it’s a gun – that’s what guns are supposed to do, shoot stuff and cause damage. That’s true. Problem is, the mostly-plastic Liberator likely allows those carrying one to slip past metal detectors without a blip, which could create a dangerous situation at airports, schools, and other public locations. While Wilson designed the firearm to have a chunk of steel inside, to avoid the metal detector problem, nothing’s stopping people from leaving that part out.

The second danger is that, if made with the wrong kind of plastic, the Liberator can literally blow up in your face. ATF tested Liberators made from various 3D printer plastics, and found that, while acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) material performed well, plastic from the manufacturer VisiJet exploded when the gun was fired.

It wasn’t all scare tactics and warnings at the ATF test site, however. As the Huffington Post reports, ATF also made its own 3D-printed shotgun, and the agency expects fully automatic 3D printed firearms to be possible down the line – and that’s not taking into account the ones made of metal. We imagine the ATF folks had a grand ol’ time churning out their own 3D-printed weapons.

In addition to releasing its cool explosion videos, ATF also wrote up a list of valuable FAQs regarding 3D-printed guns, which explains, for example, that you can create 3D-printed firearms for your own use, but you have to have a license to manufacture firearms if you want to sell your 3D creations. And certain homemade weapons need to be registered with ATF. See the full FAQs below:

ATF-3D-printed Gun FAQ

[Image via Statesman.com]

Andrew Couts
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
AI can’t tell if you’re gay or straight, but it thinks it knows what both look like
AI knows it shouldn't judge a face, but apparently, drawing one is a different story.
Emilia Clarke AI generated stock image. Gemini / Nano Banana is on the left

We've all been told not to judge a book by its cover, and you'd think AI would follow that rule, too. Ask an AI chatbot to guess someone's sexual orientation just by looking at their face, and it'll likely tell you that there's no reliable way to know. But what happens when you ask that same model to change someone's appearance to match a particular sexual orientation? Well, that's where things get uncomfortable.

A new study, accepted for presentation at the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, found that AI models from OpenAI and Google can be inconsistent when handling sensitive personal characteristics. They might refuse to make assumptions about someone based on their appearance, but when asked to generate those same assumptions visually, the results tell a very different story.

Read more
A clinical study with Google’s special chatbot shows a strong future for AI in healthcare
Google’s medical AI could give doctors a useful second set of eyes
Google Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer chatbot

AI is a useful tool for handling many tasks in private as well as professional settings, but medical advice, especially diagnosis, is one area where I generally draw the line. General-purpose chatbots tend to sound confident and convincing while giving medical advice, even when they are wrong, as studies have previously found.

That being said, Google's new research points to a much more convincing use for AI in healthcare. Its Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer chatbot, or AMIE for short, could help prepare both sides before the appointment even begins.

Read more
Relaxation music had one job in this pain study, and favorite songs did it better
Patients who chose their music reported less pain after an IV insertion
Book, Publication, Indoors

Patients’ favorite songs helped ease pain after an IV insertion in a new study, while music specifically chosen for relaxation didn’t show a significant benefit. The soothing soundtrack could apparently use a second opinion.

Researchers at University Hospital Zürich studied 204 patients receiving an IV cannula before an MRI scan. Those listening to their chosen music reported less pain 30 seconds and two minutes after insertion. Across the full sample, the clearest relief came after the needle went in.

Read more