Google Glass is removed from Twitter and Instagram

By Trevor Mogg Published January 26, 2016

While it’s not beyond the realm of possibility that Google could one day try again with Glass for the masses, the fact that it’s just closed all the social accounts for its face-based computer means there’s very little chance of it happening anytime soon.

The move to quietly shutter Glass’s Twitter, Instagram, and Google+ accounts comes about a year after the Mountain View company ended its public Explorer program, which let regular folks test the device and offer feedback.

Recommended Videos

Its now-defunct Twitter and Instagram pages have been wiped clean of images and updates, and now present visitors with standard “that page doesn’t exist” messages. As for Google+, the company managed a short message for anyone who happens to drop by:

“Hi Explorers, we’ve had a blast hanging out with you on G+ throughout the Explorer Program. From now on, if you have any questions about your Glass, you can get in touch with us here.”

For some observers, Glass was always best suited to enterprise rather than the consumer space, and that’s precisely where Google has now gone with the device. Reports last September suggested the company had hired a fresh bunch of engineers for a new “Project Aura” team aimed at reworking Glass for businesses and organizations.

Google hopes the new design, revealed by the Federal Communication Commission at the end of last year, will be useful in places like hospitals, warehouses, and factories, where important data can be accessed at speed via the device’s touch and voice controls while leaving both hands free for other tasks.

As for Glass’s departure from social media, the move appears to well and truly bring the curtain down on the consumer version of the device, a product that Google struggled to develop over the course of several years via its public Explorer program.

Once initial excitement faded following the prototype’s unveiling in 2012, privacy concerns related to the device, as well as a good deal of adverse publicity, prevented consumers from warming to Google’s high-tech specs. Aware the product was struggling, Google responded with a marketing campaign aimed at convincing the public of Glass’s usefulness. But when that failed to have any noticeable impact, the company switched its Glass-based efforts to the workplace instead.

Contributing Editor

Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…

Topics

Emerging Tech

This bizarre email flaw is leaking corporate secrets to anyone who buys the right domain

Security researchers discovered companies are accidentally sending sensitive emails to domains that outsiders can register.

Maill app icon notifications

You don't always need to hack into a company's systems to get its secrets. Sometimes, the company will simply email them to you. A new report by WIRED's Matt Burgess has uncovered a bizarre email security problem in which companies are inadvertently sending sensitive information to domains that can be registered and controlled by outsiders. Security researchers Cory Solovevich and Mike Sheward discovered that seemingly harmless addresses such as noreply and deleteduser can become unexpected gateways to corporate information when the domains behind them aren't properly controlled.

The "hack" is buying the right domain

Emerging Tech

I found 3 ChatGPT features that turned out to be way more useful than I expected

ChatGPT on iPhone

I use ChatGPT pretty much every day, but somewhere along the way, I’ve also developed a habit of poking around and looking for features I haven’t tried yet. Some discoveries are genuinely useful, while others are the kind I’ll probably remember once every six months.

Every once in a while, though, I stumble across something that actually changes how I use ChatGPT. That happened recently with three features I’d somehow been overlooking. I’ve started using all three regularly now, and if you spend a lot of time in ChatGPT too, I think you’re missing out by not giving them a shot.

Emerging Tech

Anker just exposed a big problem with portable power stations

Appliance, Device, Electrical Device

When you're shopping for a portable power station, there's one number that's almost impossible to ignore: battery capacity. A 2 kWh battery should give you roughly 2 kWh of usable power, right? Unfortunately, things aren't quite that simple. Anker SOLIX has published new efficiency data for its S Series portable power stations, and it's putting the spotlight on something that doesn't get nearly as much attention as capacity: how much of the energy stored inside the battery actually makes it to your devices.

According to Anker, portable power stations are commonly advertised with efficiency figures measured under relatively heavy loads, where they can reach roughly 89% to 92% efficiency. But that's not necessarily how most people use one during an outage. Think about what you'd actually plug in. A Wi-Fi router might sip power continuously, a refrigerator switches its compressor on and off throughout the day, and a CPAP machine could run overnight. Together, those devices may draw just a fraction of what a large power station is capable of supplying. And that's where efficiency can start slipping.