Is Triton the future of diving, or just high-octane snake oil?
So is Triton the future of diving, or just high-octane snake oil? We were as perplexed as any would-be backer, until we decided to swim a little deeper. In addition to speaking with the mask’s creators, we touched base with some of the country’s most prominent chemists, engineers, and marine biologists for their take on the tech. And we’re 99.9 percent certain that Triton is complete and total bullshit. Here’s why.
Triton claims its mask uses two specialized filters to extract oxygen from water. Allegedly, these filters use microporous hollow fiber, a (real) material comprised of billions of super-small holes that are “smaller than water molecules, [so] they keep water out and let oxygen in,” according to Triton. From there, a “micro compressor then extracts and stores the oxygen,” allowing users to breathe naturally and remain underwater for about 45 minutes.
Sounds too good to be true, right? If the key to underwater breathing is just sucking water through a porous membrane to extract oxygen molecules, wouldn’t somebody have figured that out before now? It seems highly unlikely that three guys have cracked the code to a problem that scientists and engineers have puzzled over for decades.
But perhaps the Indiegogo page doesn’t tell the whole story. Maybe these Triton guys didn’t want to bore funders with the complex technological details, so we reached out to them to get some additional insight.
Unfortunately, their responses weren’t very enlightening. Over email, Triton co-founder and CEO Saeed Khademi told Digital Trends he couldn’t share any further information because the company hasn’t yet secured any patents on its technology, and it’s worried about somebody stealing the idea.
“We have already showed the information we can without jeopardizing that another company can copy our product,” he said, adding “it is easy to judge but please understand this is our baby and we cannot risk anything, because there is some people that are skeptical about the technology.”
Alright. Fair enough. Despite how dodgy those statements seem, it’s totally possible that the Triton team was so absorbed with developing the tech that they forgot to jump through all the legal hoops needed to protect their invention. So we spoke to the experts to find out more.
Debunking the claims
Assuming that this isn’t just load of hooey, there are two ways this device could theoretically work.
The first and most likely possibility (based on what we can gather from the descriptions) is that the Triton mask works much like a fish’s gills do, and collects O2 molecules that are naturally dissolved in water. In theory, this is totally possible. The question is whether or not such a small device would be able to extract enough oxygen to keep a human being alive under water.
“Hundreds of liters of water would need to flow through a system just to get enough oxygen.”
“Just do simple math, and overestimate it, even,” he explained. “Air-saturated water contains less than one [cubic centimeter] of oxygen per liter. Take one CC of oxygen per liter of seawater, and multiply that by the number of milliliters of oxygen we need at our basal metabolic rate. If you do the math, it’s hundreds of liters of water that would need to flow through a system just to get enough oxygen.”
With a basal metabolic rate of two liters of oxygen per minute, he calculates, “that’s roughly 50 gallons you’d need to pump every minute just to maintain. You’d never do that with a mouthpiece.”
Unsurprisingly, this is the same conclusion that many skeptics came to back in 2014, when news about Triton was first circulating around the web. One of the most thorough estimates found that the Triton mask would need to filter about 90 liters per minute (about 24 gallons) to keep someone alive under water, and doing so would require a fairly large pump — one that’s far too big to fit inside such a compact mask.
By all accounts, Triton’s claims just don’t hold water — but before we condemn the tech completely, let’s entertain one more possibility.
A chemical solution
What if the device doesn’t rely solely on filters to remove oxygen from water?
It’s highly unlikely that these artificial gills are legit.
According to Kristie Boering, Professor and Vice Chair for Physical Chemistry at UC, Berkeley, this scenario isn’t very likely either. “It is difficult to make O2 molecules out of H2O molecules, and it certainly can’t be done this way and this easily,” she explained to Digital Trends in an email. “If it did work, it would make headline news, as it would provide an incredibly simple and cheap way to solve the world’s energy problems.”
So, unless Triton has developed some sort of miracle technology and successfully kept it under wraps until now, it’s highly unlikely that these artificial gills are legit.
Don’t hold your breath
As much as we’d like it to be real, pretty much everything about the Triton mask screams fraud. The lack of details on how the technology works aren’t the only thing that raises a red flag either — there’s also the video.
Demo footage on Triton’s Indiegogo page clearly shows the device being used in a swimming pool, but skeptical eyes can’t miss the fact that the footage never lasts for more than 30 seconds. If this device really allows you to breathe underwater for 45 minutes like the creators claim, why not shoot 3 or 4 minutes of uncut underwater breathing footage just to prove it? Doing so wouldn’t reveal any sensitive technical information about the device, yet would still show potential backers that it’s the real deal.
We expressed these concerns to Triton co-founder Saeed Khademi, who has assured us that a longer, uncut demo video is currently in the works.
We’re not holding our breath.
- We tested anti-snoring devices on our loudest friends. Here’s what worked
- How a clever photography trick is bringing Seattle’s shipwrecks to the surface
- NASA’s eight-rotor Dragonfly drone is heading to Saturn’s largest moon
- The U.K.’s biggest (and only) asteroid mining company has designs on our skies
- What’s the difference between Lightroom CC and Lightroom Classic?