U.S. government bans drones from all national parks

By David Nield Published June 22, 2014

Bad news if you were hoping to get some aerial footage of the Grand Canyon or Shenandoah this weekend: The U.S. government’s National Park Service has just issued an order banning drones from being launched, landed or operated in any of the 59 parks across the States. That’s an instant no-fly zone of about 84 million acres.

There is some hope for the future, as this is just a temporary order signed by National Park Service Director Jonathan Jarvis. Within the next couple of years, the NPS is planning to produce a full and comprehensive policy on the use of these small aircraft in protected areas, which will take on board further research into drone use and suggestions from the public.

Recommended Videos

In the meantime, a number of noise and nuisance complaints, as well as concerns over the safety of visitors and wildlife, have prompted the blanket ban. There’s still the flexibility to allow exceptions as and when required (when fighting fires, for example, or conducting scientific research). Many parks across the country have already prohibited the use of drones, including Yosemite and Zion.

“We embrace many activities in national parks because they enhance visitor experiences with the iconic natural, historic and cultural landscapes in our care,” said Jarvis in the official press release from the NPS. “However, we have serious concerns about the negative impact that flying unmanned aircraft is having in parks, so we are prohibiting their use until we can determine the most appropriate policy that will protect park resources and provide all visitors with a rich experience.”

The NPS statement cites two examples of drone use that tipped the balance: a “quiet sunset” at Grand Canyon interrupted by a low-flying drone that eventually crashed into the canyon, and a herd of bighorn sheep in Zion National Park disturbed and scattered by a drone. Violation of the ban could lead to a $5,000 fine and even jail time, though an NPS spokesman emphasized that in most cases park rangers would simply issue polite warnings to anyone spotted contravening the ban.

Former Contributor

Dave is a freelance journalist from Manchester in the north-west of England. He's been writing about technology since the…

Topics

Emerging Tech

Scammers are teaching AI to sound like you, and research says our brains are falling for it

Has your accent just become a security vulnerability? AI scammers are getting too good at sounding local

Scammers are turning trusted news brands into investment traps

The next scam call you receive may not sound like a robot, a call center, or even someone pretending to be your relative. AI voice generators have become capable of reproducing regional accents and dialects that sound convincing enough that researchers are warning they could become a potent social-engineering tool.

For example, a scammer could use an accent familiar to a targeted community to make a suspicious call sound considerably more trustworthy.

Emerging Tech

Scientists found a way to turn plastic bottles into cookies you can actually eat

hand holding a cookie

Plastic bottles and cookies rarely show up in the same sentence, but a team of researchers just gave us a reason to talk about both together. According to Science Daily, scientists at Southern Illinois University Carbondale have engineered yeast that can turn waste from plastic bottles and old crop leftovers into real food ingredients and create cookies.

The work began as part of a NASA program exploring how astronauts might produce their own food during deep space missions, since resupply runs from Earth aren't exactly realistic that far out. The researchers' big insight was simple: plastic bottles are packed with carbon, and so, as it turns out, is food. That single connection became the foundation for everything that followed.

Computing

Students who use AI every day may be falling behind, while moderate users pull ahead

New global testing data suggests more AI in the classroom isn't automatically better.

I assumed more AI access might help students learn faster. However, a new OECD study dispels that misconception for me and everyone else who gave their children a paid version of AI chatbots, thinking it would help them through their educational journey.

According to PISA 2025 data from 760,000 students in 91 countries, students who use AI daily score meaningfully worse on standardized tests than their peers. The full picture is more complicated than a simple ban would fix.