Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Legacy Archives

What if everything we thought we knew about DNA was wrong?

Add as a preferred source on Google

For more than half a century, scientists believed they understood the basics of DNA and the genetic make-up of every living thing because of the Double Helix model first established by James D. Watson and Francis Crick in 1953. Under that model, all known living organisms were made up of molecules comprised of two strands of nucleotides filled with various genetic information. As it turns out, however, scientists may have been wrong to believe that everything was a double helix construction, especially now that the first quadruple helix has been discovered.

New Scientist has a report about the discovery of the helix, discovered by a team at the University of Cambridge headed up by Shankar Balasubramanian. The four-stranded cells – currently called G-quadruplexes – have been identified in human cancer cells, and although little is currently known for sure about them, Balasubramanian’s team believes that they are transitory structures that may be related to the sub-division of cells.

Recommended Videos

The report explains that the G-quadruplexes were discovered “with the help of an antibody that attached exclusives to G-quadruplexes.” The team worked to intentionally stop cells from unraveling to ordinary DNA with the use of a molecule called pyridostatin which “locks” the four-stranded helices whenever they appear. With the G-quadruplexes locked in this way, the team was able to count how many were formed at each stage of cell multiplication, resulting in more that appeared during the “s-phase,” or when cells are replicating DNA prior to separation. The G-quadruplexes appeared in chromosomes and telomeres, the protective caps on chromosomes.

“I hope our discovery challenges the dogma that we really understand DNA structure because Watson and Crick solved it in 1953,” Balasubramnian told New Scientist, while also putting forward the possibility that there is something about cancer cells in particular – which divide so quickly that they may be different from other cells – that makes them particularly susceptible to the four-stranded helix. “I expect they will also exist in normal cells, but I predict that there will be differences with cancer cells,” he said. “We plan to find out whether the quadruplexes are a natural nuisance, or there by design.”

The scale of this discovery is obviously massive. Given that all life was understood to be based upon double helix DNA, it really does have the feel of the traditional everything you know is wrong shock trailed in melodramatic movies and comic books – but is also understandably important in the ongoing fight against cancer. “This research further highlights the potential for exploiting these unusual DNA structures to beat cancer,” says Cancer Research UK’s Julie Sharp, which funded Balasubramanian’s research. “The next part of this is to figure out how to target them in tumor cells.”

Graeme McMillan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
A transplant from the west coast of Scotland to the west coast of America, Graeme is a freelance writer with a taste for pop…
Anthropic’s sensitive internal data was exposed, and AI helped make it happen
Even the company behind Claude isn't immune to AI-powered security threats, as researchers discovered some worrying vulnerabilities.
Claude Anthropic Featured

AI companies spend enormous amounts of time convincing us their technology is safe and secure. But what happens when those same companies become targets of increasingly sophisticated AI-powered attacks? Anthropic, the company behind Claude, is now facing that question. According to a Washington Post report, cybersecurity startup Cathedral discovered vulnerabilities that let its researchers access sensitive information in Anthropic's internal systems.

The researchers used AI agents to identify potential entry points in less than 12 hours. Interestingly, they didn't need to crack Claude itself. Instead, they exploited weaknesses in third-party business applications that Anthropic uses for everyday operations. Anthropic's security testing program disclosed the findings, which allows outside researchers to identify and report vulnerabilities.

Read more
A new startup wants to fix the military’s working-dog shortage with cloning and gene editing
Promising pitch, plenty of unanswered questions about the dogs.
a new startup wants to fix the militarys working dog shortage with cloning and gene editing warhound featured image

Military working dogs charge into places the rest of us would flee. So, I understand why anyone would want to breed tougher, healthier dogs for the job.

Warhound, a new startup from Colossal Biosciences co-founder Ben Lamm and Anduril co-founder Palmer Luckey, has stepped out of stealth with $200 million to clone and gene-edit working dogs for American troops, police departments, and emergency services (via TechCrunch).

Read more
AI can describe a picture, but it still struggles to understand blind users
A University of Maryland study finds that Be My AI often buries useful answers in lengthy descriptions, leaving blind users to work harder to get the information they need.
Blind Man using walking stick

AI can describe a picture, identify objects, and answer questions about what a camera sees. But when a blind user needs a quick answer, getting an entire spoken essay about the scene isn't exactly helpful. Researchers at the University of Maryland (UMD) have found that AI-powered visual assistance can leave blind users doing too much work to get the information they actually need.

The study, titled Say It My Way: Exploring Control in Conversational Visual Question Answering with Blind Users, examined how people interact with Be My AI, an AI-powered feature of the Be My Eyes app. The researchers found that users often received lengthy descriptions that didn't adequately address their immediate goals, forcing them to ask follow-up questions or find ways to steer the AI towards a more useful answer.

Read more