Skip to main content

Planet busters: We asked a physicist what it would take to obliterate Earth

Chris DeGraw / Digital Trends

One of science fiction’s most classic tropes is the dastardly plan to destroy the planet with a massive, world-ending bomb. You’ve almost certainly seen it before. The trope has made appearances in some of the world’s most beloved movie franchises, from Mission Impossible to Planet of the Apes. Sometimes the bomb in question will end all life on Earth, but in other cases, it’s powerful enough to blow the entire planet to smithereens.

The sheer ubiquity of this trope begs the question: Are weapons of this size and power possible in the real world? Sure, nuclear weapons are deadly and dangerous, but do they have realistic world-ending potential? Could someone build a nuke large enough to obliterate the planet? What would it take? To get an answer, Digital Trends spoke with Brian Toon, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Colorado Boulder, whose research led to the discovery of nuclear winter.

According to Toon, if you want to get a grasp on what kind of power it would take to blow up the planet, it’s helpful to think about the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs. The energy that was released by that collision was equivalent to a 100-million-megaton blast. Toon says the chance we’ll ever create a nuclear bomb that powerful is practically zero.

How can he be so sure? Well, the largest nuclear bomb ever detonated, the Soviet Union’s Tsar Bomba, had a yield of just 50 megatons. That’s over 1,570 times more powerful than the bombs the U.S. dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. And while the blast the Tsar Bomba created was the largest man-made explosion in history, it was still only 0.0000001 percent as powerful as the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs.

Russia releases secret footage of 1961 Tsar Bomba hydrogen blast

Plus, even if we could cobble together enough fissile material to develop a bomb with the same destructive power as the aforementioned asteroid, it still wouldn’t be enough to destroy the planet. “The asteroid that killed the dinosaurs didn’t do anything to the orbit of the Earth or blow apart the Earth,” Toon says. “It made a hole in the Yucatán Peninsula and covered parts of the United States with a bunch of rocks from the crater and [exterminated] a fair fraction of all of the species on the planet, but it didn’t do anything of serious note to the planet itself.”

Not-so-assured destruction

So, we seemingly can’t blow up the Earth with a massive nuclear bomb — but could we destroy the planet in some other way with such a bomb? Another popular film trope is that nuclear warfare leads to what is called a nuclear winter. That’s the idea of nuclear blasts injecting soot into the stratosphere and blocking out the sun. Could a massive bomb do that all by itself?

According to Toon, the answer is no. One large bomb wouldn’t be enough to cause a nuclear winter. He says in order for a nuclear winter to occur, you’d need to have dozens of bombs going off in cities around the world around the same time. Plus, even if you completely decimated one of the world’s largest cities, it wouldn’t create enough soot to cause a nuclear winter.

“Toon says setting the Earth’s atmosphere on fire was actually a serious concern before the first nuclear bomb was detonated.”

“If you want to have a nuclear winter, you have to burn a lot of material, which is mainly in cities,” Toon says. “It’s a little bit difficult to quantify this, but it’s thought that if you set off typical-sized nuclear weapons in 100 cities — large cities — then you’d probably create a nuclear winter.”

So nuclear winter is unlikely from a single bomb — but what about setting Earth’s atmosphere on fire, like the bomb in Planet of the Apes supposedly could? Surely, an enormous bomb could accomplish that, right? Well as it turns out, that’s not particularly likely either.

Toon says setting the Earth’s atmosphere on fire was actually a serious concern before the first nuclear bomb was detonated. Back then, physicists worried that setting off the bomb could create a chain reaction that would set the atmosphere ablaze, but they decided to test the bomb anyway.

John Parrot / Stocktrek Images (Getty Images)

“People were concerned it would set off a chain reaction in the atmosphere — a fusion reaction — and basically burn up all of the water on the planet and destroy the Earth,” Toon says. “They had to know how likely it was that the atoms in the atmosphere would actually absorb the particles that come from the fusion reaction, and they weren’t 100 percent sure what it was, but somebody said there was a one-in-a-million chance of destroying the entire planet.”

Toon says these physicists decided a one -in-a-million chance was worth the risk, and they detonated the bomb. That explosion didn’t set the Earth’s atmosphere on fire, and neither have the many nuclear bombs we’ve set off since then. Thus, it seems quite unlikely our theoretical superbomb would do it.

What Toon worries about when it comes to nuclear bombs is less extravagant but very dangerous. He says the United States and Russia have both been working on increasing their nuclear weapons capabilities in recent years, and we could be moving toward another arms race if things continue to escalate.

“It could become one, and that would be very expensive and of no value unless you happen to be someone who works for companies that make weapons,” Toon says.

Thor Benson
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Thor Benson is an independent journalist who has contributed to Digital Trends, The Atlantic, The Daily Beast, NBC News and…
Slate Unveils $20K Electric Truck That Transforms Into an SUV
slate 20k ev blank  roller 1 web

Slate Automotive, a new American EV startup, has just unveiled its first vehicle: a radically minimalist electric truck that can convert into a five-seat SUV. Dubbed the “Blank Slate,” the EV made its debut this week, instantly turning heads not just for its versatility but for its incredibly low price—starting under $20,000 after federal tax incentives.

Unlike Tesla and Lucid, which launched with high-priced luxury models, Slate wants to flip the model: start cheap, scale up.
At its core, the Slate Truck is a utilitarian, two-seat electric pickup designed for simplicity and affordability. But what sets it apart is its transformative potential. Thanks to a modular accessory system, the truck can be upgraded over time—including a kit that adds a rear seat, roll cage, airbags, and SUV body panels. This means buyers can start with a minimalist pickup and evolve it into a family-friendly SUV—either themselves or through Slate’s growing network of service partners.
Customization is central to Slate’s vision. Owners will be able to choose from over 100 accessories at launch, ranging from vinyl wraps and Bluetooth-ready audio systems to larger battery packs and off-road upgrades. The company encourages a DIY approach, offering tools and tutorials through “Slate University” to empower users to modify and maintain their own vehicles.
Powering the truck is a 52.7-kWh battery for up to 150 miles of range, or an optional 84.3-kWh pack targeting 240 miles. Fast-charging capabilities and Tesla’s NACS port come standard. The vehicle is rear-wheel-drive and delivers around 200 horsepower—enough for urban commuting and light-duty hauling.
What enables the low price is Slate’s stripped-down approach to manufacturing. There’s no paint shop, no stamping, and only one trim level—everything else is modular. The vehicle features steel wheels, crank windows, and a rugged plastic body designed to take a beating and still look good. It’s a rejection of the tech-saturated, high-cost vehicles dominating today’s market.
Despite the minimalist specs, Slate isn’t skimping on safety. The truck is engineered to meet top crash test ratings and comes equipped with up to eight airbags, active emergency braking, and forward collision warning.
Backing this ambitious approach is significant investor support—including Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos. That backing, combined with a simplified production model, positions Slate to scale quickly once production begins in 2026.
Reservations are now open for $50 at slate.auto, with deliveries expected in late 2026. Whether Americans are ready for a stripped-down, shape-shifting EV remains to be seen, but Slate’s bet on affordability and customization could make it one of the most disruptive entries in the EV market to date.

Read more
ChatGPT’s awesome Deep Research gets a light version and goes free for all
Deep Research option for ChatGPT.

There’s a lot of AI hype floating around, and it seems every brand wants to cram it into their products. But there are a few remarkably useful tools, as well, though they are pretty expensive. ChatGPT’s Deep Research is one such feature, and it seems OpenAI is finally feeling a bit generous about it. 

The company has created a lightweight version of Deep Research that is powered by its new o4-mini language model. OpenAI says this variant is “more cost-efficient while preserving high quality.” More importantly, it is available to use for free without any subscription caveat. 

Read more
Star Wars legend Ian McDiarmid gets questions about the Emperor’s sex life
Ian McDiarmid as the Emperor in Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker.

This weekend, the Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith 20th anniversary re-release had a much stronger performance than expected with $25 million and a second-place finish behind Sinners. Revenge of the Sith was the culmination of plans by Chancellor Palpatine (Ian McDiarmid) that led to the fall of the Jedi and his own ascension to emperor. Because McDiarmid's Emperor died in his first appearance -- 1983's Return of the Jedi -- Revenge of the Sith was supposed to be his live-action swan song. However, Palpatine's return in Star Wars: Episode IX -- The Rise of Skywalker left McDiarmid being asked questions about his character's comeback, particularly about his sex life and how he could have a granddaughter.

While speaking with Variety, McDiarmid noted that fans have asked him "slightly embarrassing questions" about Palpatine including "'Does this evil monster ever have sex?'"

Read more