Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Gaming
  3. Reviews

Hands on and wallets away with ‘World of Warplanes’

Ryan Fleming
By
world of warplanes hands on screenshot 8

It’s tough to argue with free. Even if a game is terrible, if it’s free then you can still laud it for a decent diversion. When that free game happens to be good, it can change the way developers look at the gaming industry.

For the last few years, Wargaming has helped to redefine the way people look at games, at least from a financial sense. Its World of Tanks is one of the most popular games in the world with 65 million, and its free-to-play approach has helped to legitimize the financial model and spur a slew of competitors. The game is so popular that at one point, one million people in Russia alone logged on and played all at the same time. That’s insane.

Recommended Videos

To follow up the global phenomenon, Wargaming is heading to the sky. World of Warplanes is currently in beta with a tentative release window of fall. Fans of WoT should be right at home. The gameplay is obviously different, but the control scheme is easy to understand and the free-to-play model remains in place. Barring this game giving people seizures and causing a massive wave of deaths, the odds are that this game is going to be another major hit for Wargaming.

Related

Story/Concept

Point and Click Your way to Victory: As with World of Tanks, World of Warplanes is built entirely around online multiplayer combat. There is no story to speak of. Instead, the game is designed around a series of engagements, with up to 15 people per side facing off in a team deathmatch scenario. Other modes may be introduced in the future, but at the moment the game is straightforward in its approach.

world_of_warplanes_screens_image_03History attacks: Upon release there will be well over 100 planes to choose from, representing the so called “golden age of dogfighting from the early days of the 20th century through the first jets introduced in the 1940s. When you begin, you will only have access to the tier 1 planes, which are comparatively primitive prop jobs that could be destroyed with a well-placed sneeze. From there you unlock better, and less death trap-y planes through experience. The game currently features real historical planes from the United States, Germany, Japan, and the Soviet Union. Great Britain will be added prior to launch, and other nations may be introduced in the future. By the time you reach the tenth and final tier – which is not easy – you will have tracked the evolution of aviation, so in that sense the game is educational … right?

Gameplay

One stick fits all: Over the last year World of Warplanes has undergone a significant shift in the control scheme, from something like a flight-sim to an arcade-style combat game. The original controls gave you more options, but they did so at the cost of accessibility. It took several flights to begin to see how the game was meant to play. It was unwelcoming to people who just wanted to jump in an spend a few minutes playing, which is anathema to a successful free-to-play model. The new controls are much simpler, and the game is much better for it.

You can use a joystick or a gamepad, but the mouse and keyboard were the primary setup throughout development. To control your aircraft, you just point the mouse where you want to go, and your plane will comply – the keyboard holds the other controls like the throttle and target lock. It takes time to master and each plane reacts differently based on its individual stats, but anyone should be able to get the basics with minimal effort.

world-of-warplanes-hangar-2Rock, paper, warplane: Once you’ve unlocked a few planes to choose from, when selecting a plane you need to determine both the proper stats that suit your style, and the type of game you intend to play. Although dogfighting and destroying the opposing team is how you win a match, you can also attack AI controlled ground targets to make it easier on your team and to earn points. To do this without getting slaughtered by the AA guns, your best option is to pick a plane that is equipped with bombs. You may also want speed to make your escape, even if it comes at the cost of maneuverability.

The planes are grouped by four classes: assault, heavy assault, attack aircraft, and carrier aircraft. Each has its own unique abilities, but the stats that denote assault capabilities, damage points, speed, and maneuverability are the things that really determine how the fights will play out – there is no “right” choice to make, it’s just a matter of preference and knowing what the opposing team is bringing to the fight.

Presentation

Tiers in the Sky: The game looks good visually, and each of the 10+ maps (with more coming in the future) is relatively small so you’ll get into the action quickly. You’ll have plenty of time to check out the maps after you die when you enter spectator mode – and you will die often at first. The matchmaking engine will attempt to pair off the tiers so there isn’t a jet terrorizing a biplane – sure, it would be hilarious to watch, but it wouldn’t be sporting – but there will be some growing pains and you may be outclassed at first.

warplanesFree-to-pay: While the game is free-to-play and you won’t need to by anything ever to compete and win, there is a premium membership that doubles the amount of experience you receive. The idea was introduced in World of Tanks, and one premium membership will work for both. It’s an interesting incentive, and fans of Tanks have no reason not to give Warplanes a try.

Conclusion

Assuming you are a PC gamer, there really is no reason not to at least try World of Warplanes. You may not like it, it may not even be your type of game – but it’s free. Consider it a demo that never ends. The controls have been tuned to make it accessible, and the number of planes are enough to keep you playing for a long, long time to come.

Warplanes doesn’t reinvent the genre, and it won’t win over people that want a story or aren’t in to competitive gaming. If you are a competitive gaming fan, then Warplanes is worth checking out. But don’t take our word for it. There are no consequences for trying it, so check it out this fall.

Editors' Recommendations

Ryan Fleming
Ryan Fleming
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Ryan Fleming is the Gaming and Cinema Editor for Digital Trends. He joined the DT staff in 2009 after spending time covering…
One year later, New World’s never-ending MMO grind is just fine
Character using lightning in New World.

It hardly feels like much time has passed between now and last October when I dropped over 170 hours of my life into a new pirate-themed MMORPG with a suspiciously colonial-inspired backdrop. When it was still relatively new (pun intended), Amazon Games Studios’ New World promised to be a whole bunch of things that a “modern” MMORPG like Final Fantasy 14 or World of Warcraft usually isn’t. It combined gameplay loops often seen in survival sandboxes -- for example, foraging herbs and crafting your own potions -- with a perpetual PVP battleground that determined the quality of life for all players on a server. It also promised many “old school” sensibilities like minimal fast travel and punishing combat where simple trips across the map were both expensive and treacherous.

Granted, New World really struggled to make any of these individual systems work well, and very little of the game was that much fun to play. Its combat system was thoroughly limited and repetitive, with very little changing between levels one through 60. What made the experience enjoyable was also often what made it feel so disjointed -- namely, the player-vs.-player contest for the map, which influenced elements as basic as how much it would cost to repair gear after a battle. Some people really love that sort of bare-bones, down-to-the-wire experience, but frankly, I couldn’t get past how unintuitive it felt. I walked away from New World feeling like it was mostly just OK -- a decent experiment with some pretty cool ideas that ultimately succumbed to its own emphasis on grind.

Read more
Marvel World of Heroes is the next AR game from Pokémon Go studio
marvel world of heroes announcement niantic

A new augmented reality game from Niantic is on the way, and this time it's being created in partnership with Marvel and will feature plenty of iconic faces from the comics. The game was announced today during Disney & Marvel's games showcase and has a 2023 release window.

MARVEL World of Heroes | Announcement Teaser

Read more
I don’t need Starfield because I have The Outer Worlds
The spacer looks out over a vast horizon in The Outer Worlds 2 key art.

Starfield will be one of the biggest games of 2023, but I'm not that excited to play it yet.
While  Starfield's spotlight at the Xbox & Bethesda Games Showcase this year highlighted some impressive features, I couldn't shake the feeling that I'd already gotten everything I'd want from a traditional sci-fi RPG like this from another game: The Outer Worlds from Obsidian Entertainment. Ironically developed by another Microsoft-owned studio, The Outer Worlds showed that bloating up a sci-fi game with thousands of planets isn't necessary when a "less is more" mentality can still result in an expertly designed sci-fi RPG. 
Although The Outer Worlds might not be as nearly as grand as Starfield in scope, it still leaves an impression every time I revisit it. It's a focused, replayable, and hilarious adventure without much bloat, which is what I want from my RPGs. It does this while emulating Bethesda's classic The Elder Scrolls and Fallout games too, beating Starfield to the punch.
Starfield could impress me when it launches, but what I've seen of it hasn't got me that eager to play it when I'm so content with replaying The Outer Worlds while avidly waiting for its sequel.
Starfield: Official Gameplay Reveal
Fewer worlds, more fun
From the moment your escape pod accidentally lands on a bounty hunter that's supposed to help you, it's clear that The Outer Worlds is a tongue-in-cheek, satirical take on capitalism, colonization, and the sci-fi genre as a whole. While Bethesda Game Studios' narratives have their fair share of humor, much of its writing tends to be more serious and dryly written. We haven't seen enough of Starfield's dialogue or narrative to get a sense of its thematic identity yet.
Starfield's narrative could be more playful than we've seen so far, but the game's massive scope is what really worries me. During the Microsoft showcase, Todd Howard boasted that there are over 1,000 planets to explore. Because Starfield is so huge, I worry that it risks feeling unfocused. Will I get bored on planets that aren't very handcrafted and don't have as much to do? It's the same potential issue that infamously plagued No Man's Sky at launch.
Meanwhile, The Outer Worlds and its upcoming sequel are intentionally designed to avoid those bloat issues, according to former Obsidian Entertainment Narrative Designer Nitai Poddar in a 2019 Game Informer interview. "There is a lot of value in having an open-ended game that is still structured around individual discreet levels," he said. "It also tends to be easier to develop, and I'm always a fan of making the most of a budget that you have."

The Outer Worlds' developers didn't have a huge budget, and kept the game small but very tightly designed as a result. You might not be able to explore entire planets or fly between them, but you'll definitely remember what you did on every single one you visited. This smaller scope allowed the studio to make the world more reactive to each dialogue choice and player decision.
Playing a combat-focused build in The Outer Worlds gives you an entirely different experience than a dialogue-driven playthrough. You can also murder or scorn everyone you meet in The Outer Worlds, and the game accounts for it in tangible, narrative ways. This makes The Outer Worlds a great sci-fi roleplaying experience, and I'm hopeful its sequel will be too. I'm not as hungry for a sci-fi RPG on such a potentially problematic large scale anymore when The Outer Worlds and its handcrafted worlds and narratives are so enjoyable moment-to-moment, just like classic Bethesda games. 
Where both games will boldly go
As far as sci-fi experiences go, Starfield can stand out from The Outer Worlds with its combat, base-building and shipbuilding, and space combat. But when it comes to the core tenets of Bethesda's best RPGs -- compelling characters, well-written narratives, and lots of reactive and choice-driven moments -- The Outer Worlds beat Starfield to the punch without any additional fat. I already have the Bethesda-like sci-fi experience I always wanted.

Read more