Skip to main content

Webcasters’ Royalty Rate Appeal Denied

Webcasters

Webcaster’s Royalty Rate Appeal Denied Hundreds of U.S.-based net radio station may go silent Monday, as an appeals court denies a motion to delay the onset of new, significantly higher royalty rates.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia circuit has denied a motion to postpone the implementation of new music royalty rates to be levied on U.S.-based Webcasters and online radio stations. In a brief statement, the court denied the appeal, saying the objections raised by webcasters did not meet the "stringent standard" required of an appeal. The denial shoots down Webcasters’ best hope of avoiding a controversial music royalty rate hike enacted by the Copyright Royalty Board in March of 2007; many Internet broadcasters have complained the new royalty rates are onerous and will immediately put them out of business if enacted.

Recommended Videos

The new music royalty structure enacted by the Copyright Royalty Board imposes a flat-fee per-song royalty structure on music streamed over the Internet, along with a $500-per-channel fee. The new rates will also be imposed retroactively going back to January 2006, and are scheduled to double at the beginning of 2011. The new rates essentially triple the royalty amounts Internet broadcasters would be forced to pay; Internet broadcasters have characterized the new rates as "irrationally high" and say they will be forced out of business by the new regime.

Under the existing royalty agreement, online broadcasters pay an annual fee and 12 percent of their profits to SoundExchange, a music industry organization established to collect royalties from broadcasters. (SoundExchange represents most acts on major labels, but literally tens of thousands of artists whose work is broadcast via the Internet and elsewhere aren’t represented by SoundExchange, or never receive royalties allegedly collected on their behalf by the organization.) SoundExchange has offered to temporarily cap royalty payments and delay the new rates for "small" online broadcasters, but both options were essentially greeted by broadcasters as a "stay of execution."

The music industry has considered the current royalty regime something of a "discount" to jump-start an online broadcasting business, and feels online broadcasters have had more than enough time to build successful operations. Now, they argue, it’s time for online radio to begin paying "real" royalty rates. The industry argues these royalties reflect fair compensation to the artists whose music is broadcast over the Internet-based stations. The Copyright Royalty Board’s new royalty model is distinctly aimed at online broadcasting operations operated by major corporations—like Clear Channel, Yahoo, AOL, and Microsoft—rather than independent operations like Pandora, SomaFM, and others.

With the request to delay the new royalty regime denied, U.S. online broadcasters are hoping to gain reprieve by way of direct Congressional action, and are urging net radio listeners to contact their congressional representatives. If legislative action does not materialize, broadcasters will either have to shut down, pay the new royalty rates, or shift their formats to music which isn’t represented by SoundExchange, such as music offered via Creative Commons license or in the public domain.

Barring intevention, the new rates will go into effect July 15, 2007.

Appeals courts are generally restricted to correcting significant errors in procedure and interpretation in trail court, as well as some reviewing decisions and rules enacted by some governmental administrative agencies. Previous efforts to appeal the new royalty scheme to judges overseeing the Copyright Royalty Board were rejected on the basis of webcasters failing to offer new evidence which was not considered during the decision-making process.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
This smart display alternative just added a powerful new feature to help track your chores
A person using the Skylight.

Skylight is responsible for a variety of smart display alternatives with a focus on organization and schedule planning. Last summer, it launched the premium Cal Max -- a 27-inch smart calendar that we called a “streamlined smart display alternative.” Since its arrival, Skylight has continued to roll out new features to the device, and now you’ll find a powerful feature called Routines available across the Skylight Calendar lineup. Designed to simplify chores and build good habits for the entire family, it’s a unique new feature that changes how you interact with the display.

The idea behind Routines is simple -- offer visual feedback and an easy-to-use interface to make it easier than ever to keep track of (and complete) all your chores. These can be set up on a recurring schedule, allowing you to program in everything from a quick 15 minutes of reading before bedtime or a few minutes each morning for your kids to brush their teeth. Routines can be customized with various emojis and color-coding to help keep track of them, and a fun confetti animation is triggered once they’re complete.

Read more
Yale Assure Lock 2 vs. Lockly Vision Elite: which is the better smart lock?
A person opening the Yale Assure Lock 2 with their Apple Watch.

The Yale Assure Lock 2 and Lockly Vision Elite are among the best smart locks on the market. One offers a streamlined design and multiple formats, while the other is packed with features that make it an all-in-one powerhouse. Rest assured -- you can’t go wrong choosing either product. But there are some big differences between the two, and one is likely a better fit for your preferences than the other.

With that in mind, here’s a closer look at the Yale Assure Lock 2 vs. Lockly Vision Elite. From pricing and design to installation and notable features, we’ll cover everything you need to know before making a purchase.

Read more
Unlock $618 savings on the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
Couple relaxing while robot pool cleaner works

Owning a pool is fantastic, but maintaining it? Not so much. Between random yard debris, birds using it as a bath, and whatever mystery gunk floats on top after a storm, it’s a lot. That’s where Beatbot’s AquaSense 2 Ultra steps in and right now, it’s stepping in with a hefty $618 discount.
From April 14 through April 27 you can snag the world’s first AI-powered 5-in-1 robotic pool cleaner or their Amazon store. That’s not a typo, that’s next-level pool tech at a next-level price.
Why the AquaSense 2 Ultra isn’t just another robot in the pool
This isn’t your average robotic cleaner that aimlessly bounces around like a cheap robot vacuum with no sense of direction. The AquaSense 2 Ultra is smarter. Like "I’ve-got-this-go-enjoy-your-margarita" smart.

Powered by cutting-edge AI and precision path-planning, it cleans your pool like a seasoned pro:

Read more