Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Smart Home
  4. Web
  5. Legacy Archives

Scientists have built a robot that makes rats depressed. Yay, science?

Add as a preferred source on Google

ratYou’d be forgiven for assuming that the life of a lab rat is likely an unhappy one. Cooped up in a small space, living an uncertain existence where the only definite fact about the future is that it will include prodding, pain, and likely death in the name of medical science. For one set of rats in Japan, life is even more bleak, and it’s all because of one new addition to the cage: A robot rat created with the express intent of depressing real rats nearby.

The depressing robot rat was created by scientists at Waseda University in Tokyo, Japan, and goes by the suitably-unexciting name of “WR-3.” The origin of the name is far more straightforward than one might suspect: It’s the third artificial rat created at Waseda, so Waseda Rat 3 = “WR-3.” Fully mobile and remote controlled, WR-3 aims to induce stress and depression in lab animals, thereby creating scenarios where the effects of new drugs to treat depression and other psychological conditions can be more successfully measured. After all, without a robot rat there to ensure that the test subjects were really depressed, how would we really know that an improved mood would be down to the medicine, and not just an unusually good day in ratland?

Recommended Videos

As for WR-3’s preferred method of depression induction and psychological terror, it’s apparently been arrived at through a process of trial and error. According to a report in New Scientist, the Waseda team – led by Hiroyuki Ishii – tested the robot on two different groups of 12 rats, with differing approaches. Both groups were essentially stressed by the robot continuously over a five day period, although the definition of “continuously” differs in each case; the first group underwent literal continuous attack by WR-3, with the robot harassing the rodents non-stop over the entire period, whereas the second group were subject to harassment only if they moved, and the motion was picked up by motion sensors regardless of whether WR-3 was activated.

Theoretically, the two groups tested if a depressed rat is more likely to remain immobile. After the five day period, both groups were allowed to rest for some weeks before WR-3 was re-introduced into their environment, with the reaction of both groups being measured for differences. As it turned out, the robot generated the biggest depression the second time around in those that had been constantly harassed in earlier life.

Perhaps most worryingly about this is the next step in the testing process: Ensuring the connection between human and rat test subjects. Who is up for being constantly chased by a robot for five days, to see whether or not you get depressed weeks later? Come on, it’s all in the name of science.

Graeme McMillan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
A transplant from the west coast of Scotland to the west coast of America, Graeme is a freelance writer with a taste for pop…
ChatGPT Pro replaced Gemini Notebook as my favorite research app, and I didn’t see it coming
Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

I've been using Gemini Notebook ever since it launched, and for the longest time, it was my go-to app for just about everything. Whether I was researching a topic, organizing work, or studying something new, it became one of those apps I instinctively opened without thinking. When Google kept adding new features, I genuinely believed it had secured a permanent spot in my workflow.

Then, almost without realizing it, ChatGPT Pro took over. I've been using its Work mode for a while now, and somewhere along the way, it replaced Gemini Notebook. Of course, it wasn't an overnight switch. I kept bouncing between the two for weeks, but I gradually found myself reaching for ChatGPT every single time instead. At some point, I realized I hadn't opened Gemini Notebook in days. Now, I honestly don't use it at all.

Read more
AI chatbots will happily create fake news articles, and tests show ChatGPT is the worst at it
Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

The biggest AI chatbots are supposed to help people find information, not manufacture misinformation. But a new investigation suggests that separating those two jobs isn't as straightforward as many AI companies would like users to believe. A series of tests found that several leading AI chatbots, including ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, and Meta AI, could be persuaded to generate fake news stories, fabricated headlines, and even realistic-looking screenshots of well-known media outlets. While every chatbot showed some weaknesses, ChatGPT reportedly performed the worst, producing the most convincing fake content with surprisingly little effort.

The findings come from an investigation by German newsroom CORRECTIV, which tested how the AI assistants responded when asked to create false reports involving sensitive topics such as election fraud, government coups, war, vaccines, climate change, and conspiracy theories.

Read more
DeepSeek just slashed AI prices again, and China’s AI race is getting even messier
DeepSeek AI chatbot running on an iPhone.

China's AI race has never really been short on competition, but it's increasingly looking like a battle over who can charge the least rather than who can build the best model.

DeepSeek has unveiled its latest open-weight AI model, called V4-Flash, alongside a dramatic price reduction that makes it significantly cheaper for developers to use. The company has cut token pricing by 50% and has also decided against introducing a previously announced dynamic pricing system that would have increased costs during periods of heavy demand. The new changes paint a clear picture: DeepSeek appears more interested in winning over developers and expanding its user base than maximizing revenue in the short term.

Read more