Skip to main content

Google parent Alphabet misses estimates; news not all bad

All’s not well in the Alphabet world — but it could be worse. Google’s (relatively) newly minted parent company announced its 2016 first-quarter earnings on Thursday, and they’re a bit under what investors were expecting. Alphabet raked in revenue of $20.26 billion, or $7.50 per share, during the period from January to March. Wall Street was hoping for an extra cent here and there — $7.97 on $20.37 billion in revenue, according to data compiled by Reuters.

Predictably, the market is responding in kind. Alphabet’s stock is down about 5 percent in extended trading as of publication time.

Recommended Videos

So, what’s to blame for the miss? To some degree, it’s the falling price of Internet ads, a business that remains Google’s — and by extension Alphabet’s — bread and butter. Aggregate cost-per-click — how much advertisers are willing to pay for ads, essentially — fell about 9 percent from the same time last year, a steeper decline than the 5.8 percent that industry watchers were predicting. And separately, currency ups and downs impacted revenue. In the earnings report, Alphabet CFO Ruth Porat pointed to “ongoing strength of the U.S. dollar” as a major contributor to the year-over-year decline. “Our Q1 results represent a tremendous start to the year, with 17 percent growth year on year and 24 growth on a constant currency basis,” she said.

It’s not all doom and gloom, though. Alphabet’s overall first-quarter earnings were a substantial bump from the $6.47 a share it reported in the same period last year — a climb of about 16 percent. Paid ad clicks during the first quarter were also up a substantial 29 percent year over year, and the company’s Android business — now the “fastest-growing segment” of its revenue, according to Google CEO Sundar Pichai — performed quite well, bringing in $2 billion in Play Store and hardware sales.

Beyond ad and app sales, Pichai pointed to artificial intelligence and cloud computing as growing revenue drivers. “We’ve always been doing cloud … but as we’ve grown — really matured in how we handle our data center investments and how we can do this at scale — we’ve definitely crossed over to the other side to where we can thoughtfully serve … customers,” he said during today’s earnings call. Google previously predicted its cloud revenues will surpass its advertising revenues by 2020. “In the long run, I think we will evolve in computing from a mobile-first to an AI-first world.”

The surprise moneymaker this past quarter was Alphabet’s “Other Bets” category, the division that includes “moonshots” like Nest, Google Fiber, Alphabet’s life sciences and driverless car divisions, and other experiments. Investors expected revenues of $140.7 million this quarter, but the segment blew past those predictions with $166 million. That’s not to say Other Bets has quite reached profitability — it posted an operating loss of $802 million compared to last quarter’s $633 million on revenues of $80 million — but Alphabet execs confident in the category’s growth potential. Porat said that Google Fiber’s buildout represented a significant portion of the first quarter’s expense, and future cost growth would be mitigated by the “consolidation” of teams pursuing similar objectives. “We’re thoughtfully pursuing big bets and building exciting new technologies, in Google and our Other Bets, that position us well for long-term growth,” she told investors.

Some of that consolidation may take the form of sales. Alphabet is reportedly planning to spin off Boston Dynamics, a high-tech robotics lab it acquired in 2013.

All considered, though, Alphabet performed admirably this year. The company’s stock price has risen more than 43 percent over the past several months, and it briefly leapfrogged Apple in February to become the most valuable company.

Kyle Wiggers
Kyle Wiggers is a writer, Web designer, and podcaster with an acute interest in all things tech. When not reviewing gadgets…
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7: the upgrade we’ve been waiting for?
Thre Flip 7 models next to each other

I never really thought that I'd want to go down the route of owning a flip phone, ever since I swore off my Nokia in the early 2000s (you know, the one with the weird felt covering and tiny notification window).

Fast forward two decades, and I'm considering rejoining the race, thanks to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7. Coming in at $1,100, it's not cheap, but it's definitely something different compared to the world of black rectangles, and it it feels like Samsung’s Flip family has finally come of age.

Read more
I used the Galaxy Z Fold 7, here’s why I’m completely smitten
The back of the Galaxy Z Fold 7

We’ve waited several years for Samsung to join the party, but it’s finally here: Samsung has followed rivals like Oppo, OnePlus, and Honor in building a thinner, lighter, and sleeker Galaxy Z Fold 7. It’s an impressive feat of engineering and a major upgrade over previous years.

It’s easy to consider the Fold 7 nothing more than an update to the Galaxy Z Fold 6, but in many ways, it feels like a huge step forward, not just for Samsung but for all folding phones. I spent a few hours with the Galaxy Z Fold 7 in an exclusive preview, and here’s why I absolutely love what Samsung has done this year.

Read more
I tried the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 series – they’re sleek, but with a lot to prove
Watch 8 on a wrist

Trying out the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 and Watch 8 Classic is a tough gig - not in terms of it being a hardship to try out two high-end models, but that it's impossible to assess them with only 30 minutes’ use.

I can easily talk about the improved design and the fit of the straps etc, but the real changes are within the health ecosystem, and they'll need sustained testing to really understand if they're any good.

Read more