Apple wants to know how the FBI cracked the San Bernadino iPhone

By Julian Chokkattu Published May 11, 2019

While the United States Department of Justice may have withdrawn its request to have Apple create new code for the FBI to access the San Bernardino shooter’s iPhone, the encryption debate is far from over.

There’s a similar, unrelated case in New York revolving around an individual in Brooklyn, who was indicted on charges of meth trafficking. Even though he has already pleaded guilty, law enforcement want to access his iPhone to possibly obtain more information. But just like in the San Bernardino case, Apple refused to create such access that could tarnish the encrypted security on iOS.

Recommended Videos

The FBI claims to have gotten access into the San Bernardino iPhone, thanks to a third-party that provided a method. Apple may now use the result from the California case to its advantage, to find out how exactly the FBI hacked the iPhone in the New York case, according to sources that spoke to Reuters.

Apple told Reuters “we don’t know” what the FBI’s solution was, which third-party assisted them, and “what it allegedly achieves.”

A court filing on March 29 shows that the court agreed to push Apple’s next response on or before April 11, and the government can respond on or before April 22. However, the government has until April 11 to decide whether it wants to “modify” its bid to force Apple to access the Brooklyn iPhone.

“The government further agrees to update the Court by April 11, 2016, as to whether it intends to modify its application in this matter,” U.S. Attorney Robert L. Capers said in the brief.

Apple had filed a motion to delay the proceedings in the New York case, to see if the government would be able to crack the San Bernardino iPhone. Seeing as it did, the company wants the FBI to use the same method for the New York case, and also wants to find out which method was used.

“For example, if that same method can be used to unlock the iPhone in this case, it would eliminate the need for Apple’s assistance,” Apple said in its previous filing. “On the other hand, if the DOJ claims that the method will not work on the iPhone here, Apple will seek to test that claim, as well as any claims by the government that other methods cannot be used.”

Expect to hear if the Department of Justice will pursue the New York case within the next two weeks.

Julian Chokkattu

Former Mobile and Wearables Editor

Julian is the mobile and wearables editor at Digital Trends, covering smartphones, fitness trackers, smartwatches, and more…

Topics

Phones

Dbrand’s Grip cases tout superior protection for the Galaxy Z Flip 8 & Fold 8 without looking dull

Your foldables don't need to be chunky to be well protected

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Dbrand Grip Case Deal

Samsung’s latest foldables may be thinner and sturdier than their predecessors, though none of these refinements matters a lot if you're planning on slapping a thick protective cover on them. But considering how the lineup starts from $1,200 and even crosses the $2,000 mark, it makes sense to get a case. This is where Dbrand comes in.

It has just launched its Grip cases for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, Galaxy Z Fold 8, and Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, giving buyers a way to protect Samsung’s newest foldables without wrapping them in a dull slab of black plastic. Better yet, Digital Trends readers can currently save 15% on all three cases using the discount code "DIGITALTRENDS15".

Phones

I went hands-on with Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra. It’s peak foldable in an old garb.

It may not look like a fresh start, but underneath the familiar chassis, there's plenty of thoughtful engineering tweaks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra

Samsung just wrapped up its glitzy Unpacked event, revealing three new foldable phones and a pair of smartwatches. While my heart flutters for the pocketable Galaxy Z Fold 8, it’s the Ultra variant that truly feels like a refinement. Interestingly, when you look at the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra for the first time, you might mistake it for the Galaxy Z Fold 7.

Both of them look identical, and Samsung has not made any visible changes on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra for it to stand out from its predecessor. Color options, obviously, are fresh this time around, but there are a few changes that have been made under the hood, and they make this phone feel like a practically rewarding iteration.

Phones

Fold 8 Ultra vs. Fold 7: Upgrades across the board, but is the Ultra really worth the upgrade?

From battery capacity to camera hardware, here's a full comparison between the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Galaxy Z Fold 7, and whether upgrading actually makes sense.

Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra vs. Fold 7

Foldables age differently than regular smartphones or flagships. But why do I say this? It's the hinge and the foldable aspect that wins buyers over in the first place, not the specifications that get outdated every single year. That's precisely why anyone still carrying last year's Galaxy Z Fold 7 is asking a fair question today: does Samsung's freshly unveiled Z Fold 8 Ultra genuinely earn an upgrade, or does the Fold 7 still hold its ground?

And for shoppers who skipped last year's model entirely and are weighing their first foldable purchase, the calculus is totally different. A now-discounted Fold 7 might undercut the Ultra by a considerable sum, and that could matter to those looking to spend on the form factor, not the latest specifications.