Skip to main content

Boost for Apple as NY judge rules tech firm doesn’t have to unlock iPhone for FBI

Apple’s ongoing battle with the FBI over phone privacy received a boost Monday when a New York judge said the government cannot force the tech firm to access data on a locked iPhone that may provide evidence in a drug-related criminal case.

As with the high-profile San Bernardino case, the FBI tried to use the All Writs Act – a law introduced more than 200 years ago – to force Apple to comply with its request, but Brooklyn judge James Orenstein rejected the government’s action.

Recommended Videos

“After reviewing the facts in the record and the parties’ arguments, I conclude that none of those factors justifies imposing on Apple the obligation to assist the government’s investigation against its will,” Judge Orenstein wrote. “I therefore deny the motion.”

Orenstein said that ultimately, “the question to be answered in this matter, and in others like it across the country, is not whether the government should be able to force Apple to help it unlock a specific device; it is instead whether the All Writs Act resolves that issue and many others like it yet to come….I conclude that it does not.”

The All Writs Act, which became law in 1789, allows federal courts to issue orders that force third-parties to cooperate and be helpful to other court orders.

The ruling is the result of four months of deliberation by Judge Bernstein, and while the defendant in the drug case has already pleaded guilty, law enforcement says his phone could hold useful information for other investigations. Apple is yet to make any official comment on Judge Orenstein’s ruling, though the US Justice Department has said it intends to appeal.

Related: Even the FBI can’t defeat good encryption – here’s why it works

While Monday’s judgment has no direct connection with the San Bernardino case in which a California judge recently ordered Apple to help the government access the iPhone of one of the shooters involved in December’s attack, Judge Orenstein’s ruling will nevertheless be a boost for the tech giant and is likely to  come in useful as the company continues to argue its position against assisting the FBI by breaking into one of its own phones.

In the San Bernardino case, the government has asked Apple to create new software that would enable it to bypass security functions on an iPhone that belonged to Syed Rizwan Farook, one of the San Bernardino killers. The FBI believes it could hold vital information about who Farook and his wife communicated with and places they visited in the weeks and months leading up to the attack in which 14 people died.

Apple boss Tim Cook was quick to argue against the FBI’s move, saying that in the wrong hands, software used to unlock Farook’s phone “would have the potential to unlock any iPhone in someone’s physical possession.” The company said that such a step could damage the trust between Apple and its customers and adversely affect the Apple brand. “The same engineers who built strong encryption into the iPhone to protect our users would, ironically, be ordered to weaken those protections and make our users less safe,” Cook said.

Meanwhile, FBI director James Comey has argued that any software created to break the phone’s security would work on Farook’s phone only, “and so the idea of it getting out in the wild and it working on my phone or your phone….is not a real thing.”

You can check out DT’s full analysis of Apple’s unfolding battle with the FBI over encryption here.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
iPhone 17 price looks more certain to rise for first time since the iPhone 12
Apple might be preparing its first iPhone price increase in five years
iPhone 16 Pro Max next to the 16 Plus, 16 Pro and regular iPhone 16

For years now, Apple has launched the base model iPhone at $799 - but in 2025, more and more signs are pointing towards prices being increased for the introduction of the iPhone 17.

The likelihood of an iPhone 17 price increase was raised by the Wall Street Journal in May, and now Counterpoint Research notes in its recent 2025 shipment forecast that "cost increases are expected to be passed on to consumers" by not only Apple, but Samsung as well.

Read more
Why you shouldn’t care what number Apple puts on your iPhone’s software
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max's screen.

One number may change to another number at an important industry event on June 9, and despite some of the headlines that have been circulating around the news, this succinct explanation of what may happen allows you to guage its real importance. Apparently, Apple may use the WWDC 2025 keynote presentation to announce a change from the expected iOS 19 software’s name to iOS 26, and here’s why you shouldn’t worry about it. 

Many people won’t even know

Read more
20 iPhones elevate Danny Boyle’s 28 Years Later scene
A camera rig with 20 iPhones being used to shoot part of 28 Years Later.

We already know that the iPhone is a versatile piece of kit with a powerful camera capable of capturing highly impressive video.

That quality, coupled with the phone’s small size compared to conventional movie cameras, has been inspiring a growing number of filmmakers to use Apple’s handset for at least some of the shots in their grand productions.

Read more