Skip to main content

Designers including Calvin Klein file amicus brief supporting Apple in patent case with Samsung

how to watch apple september 12 event 2017 tim cook
Remember the Apple vs. Samsung case from 2011? It’s still going on, and now more than 100 industrial design professionals and educators have submitted an amicus brief in support of Apple.

For a quick refresher, Apple sued the South Korean giant back in 2011 claiming that Samsung infringed on patented designs and technology utilized in the iPhone. Samsung was ordered to pay $930 million to Apple, but that amount was later reduced by about $382 million by an appeals court. In December 2015, Samsung was ordered to pay $548 million to Apple along with an additional $180 million for “supplemental damages for continued infringement, plus interest.”

Related Videos

In February 2016, an appeals court overturned a separate 2014 ruling that ordered Samsung to pay $119.6 million to Apple for infringing on smartphone patents, awarding a victory to the Korean company. The court even found that Apple infringed on one of Samsung’s patents, and Apple was ordered to pay $158,400. While it was a loss, that amount is chump change for the Cupertino company.

In July 2015, major tech companies including Google, HP, Facebook, Ebay, Dell and more filed an amicus brief supporting Samsung. An amicus brief is a letter from parties that have an interest in the case, and it offers unsolicited information to the court. A year later in July 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to take the case, and the first oral arguments will be heard on Oct. 10.

The date looms closer, and now we have more than a hundred designers and educators undersigned to another amicus brief — but this time, it’s in support of Apple. The undersigned are impressive as they have provided product design services to companies such as Apple, AT&T, Calvin Klein, Coca-Cola, Ford, General Electric, General Motors, HP, Google, IBM, the New York Stock Exchange, NASA, Samsung itself, and more.

It also features names such as Raymond Riley, executive creative director at Microsoft; Bruce Claxton, the former senior director of design at Motorola Solutions; Calvin Klein, the founder of the fashion brand; Sohrab Vossoughi, a former senior industrial designer at HP; and many others.

The point the Supreme Court will decide is whether or not design patent damages should only be calculated by determining lost profits relating to the component that infringes on a patent, or relating to the entire device. Samsung argues for the former interpretation, and claims $399 million of the $548 million it was ordered to pay — which was initially awarded for infringing the design of the iPhone’s round corners, bezels, and more — is excessive.

The designers and educators believe Apple should be compensated with Samsung’s total profits, because a copied design can mean a lost sale.

“When a manufacturer copies the design of a successful product, it captures the consumer’s understanding of what the product does and what the product means,” according to the brief. “Moreover, copying of a design also allows the copier to enter the marketplace on the back of the brand attributes built by the patent holder — who has expended vast sums and effort in design, development, quality standards, marketing, sales, and product promotion.”

Samsung responded to our request for comment. “We have received overwhelming support for overturning the ruling in favor of Apple, including from leading patent experts, numerous concerned companies, and the U.S. government,” a Samsung spokesperson told Digital Trends. “If left uncorrected, the Appeals court’s ruling could lead to diminished innovation, pave the way for design troll patent litigation and negatively impact the economy and consumers.”

Editors' Recommendations

The Pixel 7’s best camera trick is coming to the iPhone and all Android phones
Erasing items in Magic Eraser.

The Google Pixel series of phones, specifically the Pixel 6 and Pixel 7, have an exclusive feature called Magic Eraser. With Magic Eraser, you can get rid of unwanted objects in a photo, such as people in the background or things like power lines. As of today, Magic Eraser is becoming available to all Android phones and iPhone users through Google One.

Magic Eraser debuted on the Pixel 6 lineup, which includes the Pixel 6, Pixel 6 Pro, and the more affordable Pixel 6a, which is still available to purchase (the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro have been discontinued). If you have a Pixel 7 or Pixel 7 Pro, you also have the Magic Eraser feature. One of the reasons I had always wanted a Pixel device is because of Magic Eraser, and it is something that I desperately wished Apple would implement.

Read more
SMS 2FA is insecure and bad — use these 5 great authenticator apps instead
Twilio Authy 2FA app running on an iPhone.

You probably have what seems like a million accounts across the internet these days, right? At least, that’s what it feels like for me — with all these social media, email, and banking accounts, plus digital storefronts, and more. Regardless of where I access these from, whether it’s my iPhone 14 Pro or my Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus, or even my Mac, the first step is to make sure that I have a strong and secure (preferably randomly generated) password. But for extra peace of mind, everyone needs to look into two-factor authentication (2FA) to really keep people out.

Recently, Twitter has made the news yet again because it’s forcing everyone who uses SMS 2FA to either remove it from their account or subscribe to Twitter Blue to keep it. SMS 2FA is when you get a code sent as an SMS to your phone, and while it's convenient, this is the least secure 2FA method available. SMS 2FA is susceptible to numerous vulnerabilities, including SIM swapping (where someone takes over a mobile phone number by convincing a carrier to link that number with the SIM card), SIM duplication attacks, and more.

Read more
When is my phone getting Android 13? Google, Samsung, OnePlus, and more
Android 13 logo on a Google Pixel 6a.

Android 13 has been available for Android phones since late 2022, and it's a pretty minor update from Google. Well, we say minor, but that's only in comparison to the positively gargantuan number of changes that were in Android 12 — and in light of Google's policy of trickling out improvements to Android apps over the course of a year as soon as they're ready. Android 13 is more of a tune-up to the engine that powers your phone than anything else. But it's still one worth getting excited for.

Tablet and foldable owners will see the most benefits, and there will be some updates to Material You to improve Android's customizability. There really isn't much else to say about Android 13. It's a very under-the-hood update, and that trend appears to be continuing with the upcoming Android 14 as well.

Read more