Skip to main content

European court decides that Google must let users censor their own search results

european court rules google must remove links personal material requested

In a move that could disrupt how Google and other search-engine operators work across Europe, the European Union Court of Justice ruled that Google is forced to remove personal information hosted on third-party websites from its search engine results when requested to do so.

This ruling follows a case in Spain when Mario Costeja González could not secure the deletion of an auction notice for his repossessed home back in 1998, which was on the website of a Spanish newspaper in mass circulation. González argued that, because the matter, which involved having the house auctioned off in order to recover his social security debts, was resolved, it should no longer be linked to him when searching his name on Google.

Related Videos

Google refused to do so, as with other plaintiffs, so the original case was brought to the European Union Court of Justice, the highest court in the European Union. Plaintiffs argued their “right to be forgotten,” which should give them the opportunity to have outdated information about them removed from search engines. The original article or website doesn’t have to be altered, according to the ruling. Rather, only search results would be affected.

According to the court, Google is “obliged to remove links to Web pages” under certain circumstances. “If, following a search made on the basis of a person’s name, the list of results displays a link to a Web page which contains information on the person in question, that data subject may approach the operator directly.” While search-engine operators don’t have to comply with every request, individuals can go to their national data-protection authorities to have them order the removal of the links.

Google isn’t very happy with the ruling.

“This is a disappointing ruling for search engines and online publishers in general,” said Google spokesperson Al Verney to the Wall Street Journal. According to Verney, Google will review the implications of the ruling, though law firm Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati partner Christopher Kuner believes this will have wide implications for the Internet itself and how it’s used. “It sets up a system whereby search engine providers have to, when requested, take down instances of persons names, independently of what the website they’re indexing does.”

Editors' Recommendations

You can now augment Google Lens photo searches with text
Google Lens brings visual searches to the phone.

Google is looking to improve its search results by leveraging both the power of photos, along with additional text for context. The new experience is called multisearch, which will be available on phones and tablets as part of Google Lens inside the Google app.

Google says the feature combines visual and word searches together to deliver the best results possible, even when you can't describe exactly what it is that you're trying to search for.

Read more
Spotify and Google agree to implement user-choice billing
Spotify

Spotify and Google have announced Wednesday that they have entered into a multiyear agreement that involves user-choice billing. For the first time ever, users who have downloaded Spotify from the Google Play Store will be able to choose between paying with Spotify's payment system or Google Play Billing — two payment options that will live within the app.

Google said in its blog post that it chose Spotify as its "natural first partner" to explore the user-choice approach to billing, as the music platform is deemed to be one of the largest subscription developers with a global footprint and a wide range of integrations across various device form factors. On top of that, Spotify has been advocating for expanded payment options for quite some time, and it will be working with Google to see how user-choice billing works in different countries and with developers of various sizes and categories.

Read more
Google blasts Apple over bullying, peer pressure tactics keeping users on iMessage
Close up detail of a man iMessaging on an iPhone.

When an Android phone user texts an iPhone person, it appears in a green bubble in iMessage. It’s Apple’s way of telling that the sender is not an iPhone user. But that green bubble is not particularly forgiving from a social standpoint; plus, it just led to some heated commentary from Google, which alleged that Apple engaged in bullying tactics.

The Wall Street Journal recently highlighted how the “green bubble effect" is being weaponized for creating social pressure. Teens feel ostracized for using an Android phone, because it identifies their messages with the color green. Plus, iPhones don’t come cheap and are often seen as a social status symbol. Forcing it upon others with iMessage -- and its green bubble -- as an agent is nothing but bullying, says Google.

Read more