Skip to main content

Google, Facebook, ACLU, and others urge Senate to fix watered down NSA bill

senate blocks usa freedom act on data collection reform
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Tech companies, civil liberties groups and human rights organizations are calling on the Senate to re-introduce a more comprehensive version of a once-promising NSA reform bill. The USA Freedom Act, which was passed by Congress on May 22, lost the backing of privacy advocates after the House took out several provisions to garner bipartisan support.   

Reform Government Surveillance — a coalition comprised of Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Apple, Twitter, Dropbox, LinkedIn, Yahoo, and AOL — called on Senators to fix the bill, citing the need to inspire more confidence in the Internet around the world.  

“Unfortunately, the version that just passed the House of Representatives could permit bulk collection of Internet “metadata” (e.g. who you email and who emails you), something that the Administration and Congress said they intended to end. Moreover, while the House bill permits some transparency, it is critical to our customers that the bill allow companies to provide even greater detail about the number and type of government requests they receive for customer information,” the coalition said in a press release.

A coalition comprised of Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Apple, Twitter, Dropbox, LinkedIn, Yahoo, and AOL called on Senators to fix the bill.

Civil liberties and human rights organizations echoed the group’s sentiments, saying that the current version of the legislation may give authorities enough leeway for abuse. In a letter addressed to Senate leaders, a coalition led by the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch stated that it is “very concerned” about the changes introduced to the bill.  

“All of the undersigned organizations believed the original version of the USA Freedom Act introduced in both the House and the Senate was an important step towards comprehensive reform. However, we are very concerned about the changes made to the bill in the House and the breadth of the surveillance that the bill could abusively be read to authorize,” the group said in a press release

“Before passage by the House, both the Judiciary and Intelligence Committees marked up the bill and reported out identical language. However, the final bill passed by the House markedly differs from both the original bill and the bill reported out of the committees … We respectfully submit that careful, public and deliberate consideration of this legislation by the Senate, beginning with full process in the Senate Judiciary and Intelligence Committees, is now necessary to ensure that the legislation truly achieves its unambiguously defined objectives.”

While one of the bill’s authors, Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wi), admits that the legislation is weaker than its original version, he still insists that it can still prevent the NSA from collecting phone metadata. 

The EFF disagrees. In an earlier press release, the organization withdrew its support of the bill, saying: “The Electronic Frontier Foundation cannot support a bill that doesn’t achieve the goal of ending mass spying.” 

The most contentious part of the bill is its new definition of “specific selection term,” which outlines who or what the NSA can monitor. The original definition of specific selection term was information “uniquely describes a person, entity, or account.” In the new version of the bill, it was expanded to “person, entity, account, address, or device.”

“The new version not only adds the undefined words “address” and “device,” but makes the list of potential selection terms open-ended by using the term “such as.” Congress has been clear that it wishes to end bulk collection, but given the government’s history of twisted legal interpretations, this language can’t be relied on to protect our freedoms,” the EFF said.   

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), who is credited as a co-author of the bill, said that the legislation will be taken up in the Judiciary Committee this month. While he expressed dismay over the version of the bill that passed Congress, he indicated that he is looking to bring back the tougher version of the bill. 

“I hope we can add back in some of the reforms they had to take out of the House, reforms that both Congressman Sensenbrenner and I strongly support,” he said.

Editors' Recommendations

Christian Brazil Bautista
Christian Brazil Bautista is an experienced journalist who has been writing about technology and music for the past decade…
Much-desired iPhone feature may not arrive until 2027
The Apple logo on the iPhone 14 Pro Max.

We’ve heard a lot in recent years about an iPhone that ditches the Dynamic Island, placing the selfie camera and FaceID technology beneath the glass for a clean, full display. But despite a growing number of Android phones adopting the design, for the iPhone it still seems a ways off.

In 2022, oft-reliable Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo claimed that a full display could arrive with next year's iPhone 16, though others in the same field have since suggested that it may take several more iterations of the iPhone before the tech giant is able to make the change.

Read more
This smart ring maker has some wild product plans for 2024
A person holding the Ultrahuman Air ring, showing the sensors.

“We wanted to chat about what's coming in the near future, as well as some new product launches that are happening over the next couple of months, which I think you'll find really interesting. I wanted to give you a sneak peek into what's coming.”

This was how Mohit Kumar, founder and CEO of Ultrahuman, started our conversation when I spoke to him over Zoom. And in doing so, he definitely had my attention. What followed was a fascinating glimpse at how the Ultrahuman Ring Air that I wore recently is only the start for this four-year-old company.
15 new product releases

Read more
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 line prices slashed for the holidays
A Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 is held up on top of a desk.

If you're thinking about getting a tablet for a holiday gift -- whether for a loved one or for yourself -- you should check out the discounts that are available for the Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 line of devices. The previous-generation tablets are still pretty reliable by today's standards, and they offer amazing value because of Samsung's discounts. For their 128GB versions, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 is down to $510 from $700 for $190 in savings, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ is down to $630 from $900 for $270 in savings, and the Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra is down to $720 from $1,100 for $380 in savings. If you're interested in any of these tablet deals, you're going to have to hurry with your purchase if you want the device to arrive before the rush of the holiday season starts.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 (128GB) -- $510, was $700

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 features an 11-inch touchscreen with a 120Hz refresh rate for super smooth movements on the display, and it's powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 with 8GB of RAM that enables fast performance while you launch and use apps. What makes it stand out from other Android tablets is its suite of productivity features, including the customizable Edge Panel, the versatility of the S Pen, and the ability to function as a portable monitor, among others. The Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 also has an 8,000 mAh battery and the option to expand its storage capacity by up to 1TB through a microSD card.

Read more