Skip to main content

A judge has rejected Lyft’s $12.5 million settlement with drivers

lyft settlement judge denied ride share app
Lyft may have been willing to accept the $12.5 million settlement it reached in an action brought on behalf of many of its drivers, but a California judge wasn’t nearly as thrilled, and has now invalidated the settlement.

The settlement, which Lyft agreed to this January, would have given the drivers listed in the class-action lawsuit several benefits aside from the financial payout, including a requirement that Lyft issue warnings when drivers are about to be deactivated, and that the ride-sharing service pay arbitration costs whenever there is an employment-based dispute between a driver and the company. However, the settlement did not bar Lyft from continuing to classify its drivers as independent contractors, rather than full-fledged employees.

Related Videos

What irked U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria, and what led to him denying approval of the $12.5 million settlement, was its raw insufficiency. He concluded that the settlement grossly undervalued the drivers’ claims and that the settlement “shortchanged” them. This conclusion coincides nicely with a recent report that found that Lyft would have to fork over $126 million in reimbursement expenses over four years if the company was required to classify its drivers as employees.

Judge Chhabria separately addressed the Teamsters Union and Lyft drivers’ argument for employee classification, finding that there were “good arguments” made and that those arguments would be “best directed to the legislative or executive branches.” Both parties also filed a motion to intervene in the lawsuit.

As one could probably imagine, Lyft isn’t too thrilled with Judge Chhabria’s decision. “We’re disappointed in the preliminary ruling,” said a Lyft spokesperson. “We believe we reached a fair agreement with the plaintiffs and are currently evaluating our next steps.”

Teamsters international vice president and president of Teamsters Joint Council 7 Rome Aloise was on the opposite end of the emotional spectrum. “We are pleased with today’s ruling,” said Aloise. “We are hopeful that Lyft drivers will get more of the money that they deserve thanks to our objections in this case, and we proudly continue to stand with Lyft drivers who have been misclassified and are seeking justice.”

In others words, we haven’t heard the last of the ongoing drive by Lyft’s drivers toward being classified as employees.

Editors' Recommendations

PayPal’s new Rewards feature adds Honey shopping discounts

PayPal acquired rewards platform Honey several years ago and this week it announced it's folding Honey's features and services into its own platform as part of the new "PayPal Rewards" offering.

Honey is a popular browser extension that trawls the web in search of deals, coupons, and promotional codes. It means that from this week, all earned points, gift cards, and PayPal shopping credits acquired in Honey will now be viewable in a new Rewards section in the main PayPal app, making it easier for users to manage their related finances while also taking advantage of new ways to earn points.

Read more
Meta found over 400 mobile apps ‘designed to steal’ Facebook logins
Social media mobile apps on a smartphone screen, all on a textured gray fabric background.

If you frequently use your Facebook login to sign into new mobile apps you've installed, you may want to pay attention to Meta's latest announcement.

On Friday, Facebook's parent company Meta published a blog post written by its Director of Threat Disruption David Agranovich, and Ryan Victory, a Malware Discovery and Detection engineer at Meta. The post detailed Meta's discovery of over 400 mobile apps "that target people across the internet to steal their Facebook login information." Essentially, Meta found hundreds of mobile apps that were "designed to steal"  the login information of Facebook users by having those users log in to these apps with their Facebook login information.

Read more
Google is paying a historic $85 million fine after illegally tracking Android phones
Google Logo

Google will be paying Arizona $85 million in a settlement over a 2020 lawsuit that claimed the company was illegally tracking Android users for targeted advertising.

According to a report from Bloomberg, Attorney General Mark Brnovich filed a lawsuit in May 2020 claiming that Google violated the state's Consumer Fraud Act by gathering location data from Android users, even after people turned off their location settings. At the time, Google's own employees were confused about its privacy controls, admitting that it could use some fine-tuning so that when users deny the company permission to track their data, it has to respect their decision.

Read more