Skip to main content

I took a folding phone and laptop on vacation — and discovered one huge problem

If something excites me about the future of mobile tech, it’s the foldable form factor. I love these devices so much that the Galaxy Z Fold 3 remained my primary phone, despite having access to the best flagships. Whether it be the Motorola Razr, Galaxy Z Fold 4, or the Asus Zenbook 17 Fold OLED – one common factor between them is how futuristic they feel every time you unfold them. I used the latter two as a pair for three weeks, and one of the weeks was spent traveling to Varkala, Kerala – a southern place in India.

Traveling with foldables in my pocket and backpack gave me a new perspective on the design, especially because I commuted on every means of public transport – plane, train, bus, bicycle, scooter – you name it. It was a 16-hour one-way journey to reach my destination from New Delhi. On my way, I discovered that foldables are productive machines, but the form factor still has one major problem to solve.

The duality of productivity and portability

ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED folded on table
Image used with permission by copyright holder

I like my backpack to be as light as possible, while also packing it to the brim. As a result, I’m a big fan of devices that help me in productivity and are lightweight at the same time. My laptop choices echo the same. I’m a MacBook Air user coming from a Surface Pro – both of which are known for their portability.

A standard smartphone or laptop can be productive and portable simultaneously. Thus, helping me travel light. But that doesn’t hold true for foldables. “Portability” and “productivity” are two words that don’t mix well in the foldable segment — in fact, they are mutually exclusive.

Unfolding the Galaxy Z Fold 4.
Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

For example, the Galaxy Z Fold 4 is amazing for reading on the go due to the big screen it offers. I like reading books and articles on the device, and it is my go-to smartphone when I want to read while traveling. But keeping it in my pocket is a tedious task. When folded, it measures double the size of when it is unfolded. Keeping the Z Fold 4 in my pocket is like keeping two phones squashed together. I can put up with it for my 30-minute metro journeys, but it’s uncomfortable if you want to lie down on a train for a six-hour journey.

The same goes for the Asus Zenbook 17 Fold OLED. It’s amazing how I can unfold a 12.5-inch Surface Pro kind of display to a 17.3-inch screen. It’s gorgeous, impressive, and amazingly useful. I could use it as a laptop on the train, and unfold it to become a monitor-keyboard combo in a cafe in Varkala.

ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED in hands
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The problem arises when you want to carry the laptop with you for long journeys. It doesn’t fit in the laptop pocket because of its thickness. It’s like two thick laptops stacked together (I mean, of course, it’s physics). Naturally, I had to keep it in the pocket, which I’d have used to put my tees and towel. As a result, I had to carry another bag with me to compensate for the space lost. Simply put, the laptop is too thick to be carried around while on vacation.

Both these devices put one thing into perspective – how the foldable form factor needs to be made thinner if it really wants to solve the problem it was created for — that is, being productive while also being portable. Both the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 and the Asus Zenbook 17 Fold OLED are not meant to be carried around for long vacations. They’ll make your pocket (as well as your backpack) heavier and more uncomfortable.

Foldable smartphones are getting more pocketable

Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Oppo Find N closed in hand.
Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

I’m not talking about the already-pocketable clamshell foldables here. I prefer the big foldable smartphones that transform into even bigger devices.

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 is a segment-leading smartphone. And while it lacks pocketability, Xiaomi has already made a thinner, pocket-friendly foldable in the form of Mix Fold 2. It folds flat, unlike the Samsung foldable. Plus, it is 4.6mm thinner when folded, which is likely to result in being more pocket-friendly. On the other hand, Oppo is trying another approach – making a wider foldable with the Oppo Find N and Oppo Find N2, which are more one-hand friendly.

While foldable smartphones are already getting better, as the foldable tech matures, we can expect even better all-rounded foldable laptops at a more reasonable price. I have high expectations from Asus after experiencing what it’s done with the Zenbook 17 Fold OLED.

Until then, in my opinion, foldables aren’t yet solving the problem they were made to solve. They’re close, but not quite there.

Editors' Recommendations

Prakhar Khanna
Prakhar writes news, reviews and features for Digital Trends. He is an independent tech journalist who has been a part of the…
Motorola’s cheap Razr could change folding phones forever
A person opening the Motorola Razr 40.

In all the fuss over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 and Galaxy Z Fold 5, you may have forgotten Motorola also recently released some foldable phones of its own. The Motorola Razr (2023) and Motorola Razr Plus (confusingly known as the Razr 40 and Razr 40 Ultra, respectively, in the U.K.) are two flip foldables well worth your attention. But there's something special about this duo. While the Razr Plus is a flagship phone with a lot in common with the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5, the Razr (2023) is rumored to be something we haven't seen in a foldable yet -- a true, honest-to-god midrange phone.

While U.S. pricing and availability haven't been confirmed for Motorola's new foldable, the odds are it'll fall somewhere around the $600 to $800 price range. While not exactly an affordable phone by most metrics, it's likely to have the cheapest MSRP of any foldable sold in the U.S. to date.

Read more
2 weeks with the Google Pixel Fold made me glad I didn’t buy it
A person holding the Google Pixel Fold.

Some of what you’re about to read is going to make it sound like I hate the Google Pixel Fold, but this is not the case. I’ve spent about two weeks with the phone, and there are multiple elements I really like (and even love). However, this is an $1,800 smartphone, and when something costs that much, it needs to come close to being exactly right — especially when there is a really fantastic competing product selling for the same price.

By the end of my time with the Pixel Fold, I had reached a surprising, but very happy conclusion.
My most controversial opinion on the Pixel Fold

Read more
I thought I’d hate the Galaxy Z Flip 5 — until I changed one thing
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 with its cover screen on.

It's been a little under a month since I got my Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5, and throughout most of that time, I've thoroughly enjoyed every second with it. I was already quite fond of the Galaxy Z Flip 4 last year, and the Flip 5 addresses my main complaint of its predecessor: the cover screen.

The 1.9-inch cover screen on the Flip 4 was fine for viewing notifications or paying with Samsung Pay ... but that was about it. If I wanted to interact with the phone in any meaningful way, I always had to open it up. But with the 3.4-inch cover screen on the Galaxy Z Flip 5, that hasn't been the case this year. I'm able to do so much more with the cover screen than ever before, and it's greatly enhanced the practicality of having a flip phone.

Read more