Skip to main content

Dan Aykroyd dishes out criticism of ‘Ghostbusters’ reboot director Paul Feig

ghostbusters aykroyd slams paul feig
Image used with permission by copyright holder
There’s always plenty of blame to go around when a big-budget film doesn’t live up to expectations, but the buck tends to stop with the guy or gal in the director’s chair. While last year’s Ghostbusters reboot was relatively well-received by critics, moviegoers weren’t as keen on the film judging by its box-office take. As a result, plans for an updated franchise were waylaid and the blame game was off to the races.

Though the pot had been relatively stagnant in recent months, OG (original Ghostbuster) Dan Aykroyd stirred it — appropriately enough — on Sunday Brunch, a British morning show that features culinary creations and celebrity guests. When the hosts brought up the future of Sony’s prized franchise on yesterday’s show, the actor was careful to praise the performances of the new generation of paranormal exterminators, and instead focused his criticism on director Paul Feig. Still, what he had to say may just have PR-conscious studio execs asking: “What did you do, Ray?”

Here’s the full text:

“The girls are great in it. Kate McKinnon, Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig — what wonderful, wonderful players they are — and Leslie Jones. I was really happy with the movie, but it cost too much. And Sony does not like to lose money. It made a lot of money around the world but it just cost too much, making it economically not feasible to do another one. So it’s too bad. You know, the director, he spent too much on it. And he didn’t shoot scenes we suggested to him and several scenes that were going to be needed and he said ‘Nah, we don’t need them.’ Then we tested the movie and they needed them and he had to go back. About $30 to $40 million in reshoots. So, yea. So he will not be back on the Sony lot any time soon.”

If you’re looking for a one-line postmortem on the reboot, it’s “Sony does not like to lose money.” Ultimately, this franchise was derailed not because of the quality of film, but because the numbers just didn’t add up. That isn’t because nobody went to see the film, but because it didn’t attract a wide enough audience to justify its substantial production/marketing budgets.

If you believe Aykroyd’s version of events, Feig was more than a little bit cavalier with the allocated dollars and cents. According to Deadline, however, Sony is disputing his math, claiming that the reshoots he referenced actually cost between $3 and $4 million.

As it stands, the future of big-screen ghostbusting is in doubt, but Sony is still heavily invested in the property, with an animated TV series in the works and a separate division of its studio (Ghost Corps) working on churning out a variety of projects. Stay tuned.

Adam Poltrack
Adam is an A/V News Writer for Digital Trends, and is responsible for bringing you the latest advances in A/V…
Deadpool & Wolverine: Everything we know about the film formerly known as Deadpool 3
Deadpool and Wolverine stand together in Deadpool & Wolverine.

In retrospect, we should have suspected that Deadpool & Wolverine wouldn't keep its most famous co-star out of the title. In 2022, Ryan Reynolds coaxed Hugh Jackman into reprising his role as Wolverine for the first time since 2017's Logan. Once that happened, the name Deadpool 3 didn't fully convey how monumental this film would be.

So Marvel Studios has officially retitled it as Deadpool & Wolverine. Jackman has also humorously rebranded the film as Wolverine & [expletive], which would make this R-rated flick a lot harder to market!

Read more
5 years ago, Game of Thrones aired its last great episode. Here’s why it still holds up
Jamie knights Brienne in episode 2 of Game of Thrones season 8.

Many fans would likely agree that Game of Thrones went out not with a bang, but a profound whimper. After dominating pop culture for nearly 10 years, the hit HBO series concluded with a trio of episodes that were universally reviled by both fans and critics alike. The show's lackluster, ham-fisted finale led to its popularity seemingly vanishing into thin air. In the five years since it aired, time hasn't been kind to Game of Thrones season 8.

To this day, many people still discuss the series' final season with a mix of bitterness and disbelief, and those fans won't find any disagreement about the quality of Game of Thrones' last few chapters here. As disappointing as its eighth season remains, though, April 21 marked the five-year anniversary of its noteworthy second episode, A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms. The fan-favorite installment ranks not only as its season's best chapter, but also as the last great episode that Game of Thrones ever produced.

Read more
Everything coming to Netflix in May 2024
Two men look at each other in Bodkin.

Unfrosted | Official Trailer | Netflix

It's sad to see April end. Not only was the weather nice, but Netflix was killing it with a lot of its original programming like the thriller series Ripley with Andrew Scott, the true-life story Scoop, and the cathartic drama Baby Reindeer, which became a surprise hit late in the month.

Read more