Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Entertainment
  3. Legacy Archives

After waiting 20 years for Dumb and Dumber To, Peter Farrelly is ready for a third

Add as a preferred source on Google

Five years ago, Peter Farrelly received a phone call, out of the blue, from Jim Carrey.

“He said he was on the road, at a hotel, and Dumb and Dumber was just beginning,” Farrelly remembers. “He said he sat there and watched the whole thing. And then he tells me: ‘God damn it, we gotta do another one.'”

And with that, Dumb and Dumber To was born.

Recommended Videos

Over the years, filmmaker siblings Peter and Bobby Farrelly had mulled over the idea of making sequels to some of their classic comedies. A Kingpin followup was on the table at one point, as was There’s Something Else About Mary.

“We didn’t want it to be Dumb and Dumber Lite. We wanted it to be as good as the first one.”

“It felt like a money grab. We could make a lot of money doing that, and people would go, but for what reason?” says Peter. “We told the studio that unless it turns out Mary has balls, we won’t do it. If they wanted to do that, then there is something else about Mary. There’s a good story there.”

Needless to say, we live in a world where Mary Jensen/Matthews does not have balls, which is all the same to the Farrelly brothers. All along, Lloyd Christmas and Harry Dunne were the two characters they were most interested in revisiting.

“We left them exactly where we found them,” says Peter. “In the first movie, they had zero growth. They were the same people; nothing changed, they weren’t married, they didn’t have new jobs. They were still unemployed. They were heading home from Aspen. It made sense to us that if we were going to do a sequel to something, this is it. Just put them on another adventure.”

Dumb and Dumber To interview
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The new adventure did not come easily. The Farrellys didn’t want to make a Dumb and Dumber sequel too soon after the original, for one thing. (“We didn’t want to be known as the Dumb and Dumber guys only,” says Peter.) And while Jeff Daniels frequently and eagerly checked in about making another one, Carrey was another story.

“Jeff always checked in,” says Peter. “He would ask, ‘When are we doing a sequel?’ And we would say, ‘Whenever Jim’s ready.'”

Cut back to Carrey’s phone call five years ago. It was the secret password, the magic words the Farrelly brothers needed to hear to move forward.

“When Jim Carrey becomes Lloyd, he’s not Jim Carrey. He’s Lloyd.”

“He wasn’t even talking about how funny it was,” Peter says of why Carrey was finally interested in another Dumb and Dumber. “He was talking about how much love was in that movie. It was such a loving movie. We had to do another one.”

With Carrey fully on board, Warner Bros. paid the Farrellys to write a script, alongside collaborators Bennett Yellin, Mike Cerrone, Sean Anders, and John Morris. The result was a home run with Carrey and Daniels, but the studio? Not so much.

“We didn’t hear from Warners for days,” says Peter. “When they finally got back to us, they were like, ‘Well, it’s a good start.'”

According to Farrelly, the studio was concerned with how much Dumb and Dumber To relied upon viewers’ memories of the first film. “Nobody will remember Billy in 4C,” they said, according to Peter. But Peter and his brother argued that Dumb and Dumber had “been on TNT and TBS every day for 20 years.” The two sides couldn’t come to an agreement, casting doubt on the sequel’s progress.

“But to their credit, and it’s important, Warners was about as standup as a studio can be in this town,” says Peter. “They told us from the beginning, ‘Look, if we don’t make it, relax. We’ll let it go. We’ll let you make it somewhere else.’ And they don’t have to do that. They could just say, ‘We’re not making it and we’re keeping it, because maybe we’ll make it later.’ They could give you a million reasons. They didn’t do that.”

Instead, Dumb and Dumber To wound up in Universal’s hands. Once the wheels were in motion, and filming actually began, the entire crew released a collective sigh of relief.

“To me, it seems like a trilogy; there should be a third one.”

“[The process] was so hard that when we started shooting, there was this feeling of relief for the first week, that we finally are doing this,” says Peter. “It didn’t come easy.”

Soon, it became easier, as the Farrellys settled back into the Dumb and Dumber universe, helped along by how readily Carrey and Daniels returned to their ridiculous roles.

“When Jim Carrey becomes Lloyd, he’s not Jim Carrey. He’s Lloyd. He doesn’t think like Jim Carrey. He thinks, ‘What would Lloyd do?'” says Peter. “When he’s playing Lloyd Christmas, he’s in a good mood. He’s a happy, happy man.”

As for the other Dumb star, Farrelly describes Daniels as “the most underrated actor working today,” with range that stretches from the lunacy of Dumb and Dumber to something as serious-headed as The Newsroom.

“Jim has a more method approach,” says Peter, “but with Jeff, he doesn’t need anything. There’s no method. He just understands his character. He gives his head a little shake, and then he’s Harry.”

Dumb and Dumber To interview
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Even if their approaches are different, it’s Daniels and Carrey’s chemistry that carries Dumb and Dumber, and made all the effort that went into creating the sequel well worth the cost.

“This took a long time. It was a high bar,” says Peter. “We didn’t want it to be Dumb and Dumber Lite. We wanted it to be as good as the first one, for it to be the type of movie where two or three years after you’ve seen it, the two movies blur together; like you don’t know which joke came from which movie.”

Put simply, he says, “we worked our asses off.” And while it was an exhausting experience, it was a fun one, too. So much so that the Farrellys aren’t closing the door on making a third Dumb and Dumber — one that won’t take 20 years to make, if they have it their way.

“I wouldn’t say we’ll do it next year, but I would love to do it. To me, it seems like a trilogy; there should be a third one,” says Peter. He even has a title: “Dumb and Dumber For.”

Dumb and Dumber To is in theaters this weekend.

Josh Wigler
Former Contributing Editor
Josh Wigler is a freelance entertainment reporter who has been published by Comic Book Resources, Comics Alliance…
Netflix is worried people aren’t watching enough so its next move could change the app forever
Netflix's next big update could look a lot more like cable TV
Netflix on TV couple watching

Netflix has spent years telling the entertainment industry that binge-worthy originals and a simple user experience were enough to stay ahead. That strategy helped make it the world's biggest streaming service. But according to a Wall Street Journal report, the company is increasingly concerned about a different metric: engagement.

While Netflix continues to post healthy profits and retains one of the lowest subscriber cancellation rates in the industry, executives are reportedly seeing early signs that people are spending less time watching content. That matters because engagement - not just subscriber numbers - has become one of the biggest indicators of whether customers will stick around, watch ads, and continue paying for the service.

Read more
EXCLUSIVE: The Mandela Catalogue producer shares new details about the upcoming horror adaptation
Producer Aaron B. Koontz discusses adapting The Mandela Catalogue with Alex Kister and Steven Spielberg
A man with a scary face in The Mandela Catalogue Vol.4.

Following the box-office success of A24's Backrooms, Hollywood has turned its attention to another analog horror phenomenon. On July 2, Deadline announced that producers Aaron B. Koontz (Shelby Oaks) and Steven Spielberg are developing a film adaptation of the viral YouTube horror series, The Mandela Catalogue.

Series creator Alex Kister will direct the film with a screenplay written by Tyler Clifton. According to Kister, the film follows a group of high school graduates "struggling to maintain their grip on reality after the disappearance of a local student sparks a chain of unexplainable, unsettling events."

Read more
Microdramas are booming, and Character.AI is turning it into a two-way obsession
Watch an AI microdrama, then interrogate the characters yourself
Character.AI AI Microdramas Featured

Microdramas have already conquered the tiny vertical screen. Character.AI wants to make the experience even more immersive. The chatbot platform has launched c.ai Series, a collection of original, mobile-first microdramas created by its in-house studio. Each show consists of bite-sized vertical episodes, although watching is only half the experience. Viewers can also chat directly with the characters afterwards, revisit moments from the story, explore relationships, or begin entirely new storylines.

It is the latest attempt to blend streaming with audience participation. Netflix recently took another route with Unhinged, a horror game that turns a viewer’s phone into a controller and allows them to call during gameplay. Meanwhile, Character.AI is bringing interactivity into the fiction itself by keeping its characters available long after an episode ends.

Read more