Skip to main content

Amazon faces heat from federal labor board for alleged retaliation

Amazon workers in Chicago have filed complaints with a federal labor board, claiming they were retaliated against for speaking out against the company, according to a report in Buzzfeed News.

The Chicago employees filed charges against Amazon alleging they were retaliated against for protesting working conditions during the coronavirus outbreak, kicking off an inquiry from federal labor regulators, Buzzfeed News reports, in what experts say is an “unusual” move. The complaint says that Amazon targeted the workers specifically because they spoke out against the company and that the tech giant’s claims that workers violated social distancing rules are a ruse.

Recommended Videos

In a statement to Digital Trends, Amazon spokesperson Av Zammit said the allegations made by the Chicago workers were “simply unfounded.”

“Nothing is more important than the health and safety of our teams,” Zammit said. “Since the early days of this situation, we have worked closely with health authorities to proactively respond, ensuring we continue to serve people while taking care of our associates and teams. We have also implemented proactive measures at our facilities to protect employees, including mandatory social distancing, adding distance between drivers and people in the community when making deliveries, and providing masks for everyone to use, as we remain committed to keeping our teams healthy and safe.”

Zammit said Amazon has added new protections and benefits for workers since the coronavirus pandemic began to spread, including increased normal and overtime pay for warehouse workers and paid sick-leave for part-timers.

According to Buzzfeed, federal labor regulators declined to punish Amazon in one particular instance, saying the company’s conduct was unlawful but didn’t represent a pattern. However, the decision from regulators opened up the possibility for punishment if other valid claims against Amazon come forward in the next six months.

Amazon’s response to the crisis has been criticized by some of its workers as insufficient — and has led to allegations of retaliation. In New York City, worker Chris Smalls was fired after organizing a strike by workers at a Staten Island warehouse. Amazon claims Smalls was fired for violating orders to quarantine himself, which Smalls denied.

A reportedly leaked memo from Amazon detailed a PR strategy of shifting blame onto Smalls to make him the “the face of the entire union/organizing movement.”

Two other employees were fired after being vocally critical of safety conditions at Amazon’s warehouses.

The two employees in question, Emily Cunningham and Maren Costa, were members of a worker’s group called Amazon Employees for Climate Justice and had tweeted about Amazon’s treatment of its warehouse workers.

An Amazon representative told Digital Trends at the time that they were fired for “repeatedly violating internal policies.”

Correction: An earlier version of this story misstated the incident Amazon was being investigated for. The inquiry relates to Amazon’s alleged treatment of workers in Chicago.
Georgina Torbet
Georgina has been the space writer at Digital Trends space writer for six years, covering human space exploration, planetary…
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more
Apple TV+ just got a price slash that’s tough to resist, and it won’t last long
The Apple TV main screen.

Apple has just quietly announced that it will be slashing the price on its Apple TV+ offering for a limited time deal.

While Apple prices the service at a standard $9.99 per month usually, it has just cut that way down to $2.99 per month.

Read more