Skip to main content

Lucid Motors accepts $1 billion investment from Saudi Arabian fund

Lucid Motors Air
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Shortly after Tesla co-founder and CEO Elon Musk sent shock waves across the automotive industry and down Wall Street when he revealed he wanted to take the company private, rumors began circulating that Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund would invest not in Tesla, but in upstart Lucid Motors. Those rumors have been confirmed, as Lucid has accepted a $1 billion investment from the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF). However, Lucid has also pushed back the launch of its first production model — the Air.

“By investing in the rapidly expanding electric vehicle market, PIF is gaining exposure to long-term growth opportunities, supporting innovation and technological development, and driving revenue and sectorial diversification for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,” a PIF spokesperson said in a statement.

Recommended Videos

The deal would benefit both sides. On one hand, Lucid would receive the cash injection it needs to start production of the Air, the 22nd-century-esque concept car (pictured) it has shown at events all over the world. The Air will be the company’s first production car so making it a reality is a challenging and expensive process. On the other hand, the investment fund would continue the process of future-proofing its assets portfolio by moving away from crude oil.

Lucid plans to use this investment to finish development work on the Air, and to complete a factory in Casa Grande, Arizona. In a press release announcing the investment, Lucid said the car would launch in 2020. The automaker originally targeted a 2018 launch date, but missing deadlines has become common for fledgling electric automakers. New companies often don’t realize how difficult building and selling cars can be.

The Air may very well be worth the wait. In 2017 Lucid announced a base price of $60,000 for a rear-wheel drive model with 400 horsepower and 240 miles of range. But Lucid also plans to offer a high-end version with all-wheel drive, 1,000 hp, and a range of 400 miles for somewhere north of $100,000. A prototype Air hit 235 mph on an Ohio test track in 2017. But Lucid needs to hurry up, as it faces competition not only from the likes of Tesla and startups such as Faraday Future and Nio, but also established automakers launching their own luxury electric cars.

Updated on September 18, 2018: Added confirmation of investment in Lucid Motors by Saudi PIF.

Ronan Glon
Ronan Glon is an American automotive and tech journalist based in southern France. As a long-time contributor to Digital…
Google just gave vision to AI, but it’s still not available for everyone
Gemini Live App on the Galaxy S25 Ultra broadcast to a TV showing the Gemini app with the camera feature open

Google has just officially announced the roll out of a powerful Gemini AI feature that means the intelligence can now see.

This started in March as Google began to show off Gemini Live, but it's now become more widely available.

Read more
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more