Skip to main content

Justice Department, several states planning antitrust lawsuit against Google

 

The Justice Department and a group of state attorneys general are expected to hit Google with an antitrust lawsuit this summer, according to a pair of blockbuster reports released Friday — targeting the tech company’s stranglehold on the advertising industry.

Recommended Videos

The lawsuit is likely the result of an investigation that began in September, when all 50 U.S. states announced an antitrust probe into the company, focusing on its advertising practices and its control over internet search.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that the Justice Department plans to make the tech giant’s “ad technology” the main point of emphasis, while more broadly playing on the point that Google uses its web dominance to effectively crush out any other competitors.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who led the initial investigation, said Google has already been subpoenaed, as well as “impacted third parties.”

Paxton told The Wall Street Journal that the suit is likely to come this year. Information is still being gathered, however, and despite the coronavirus pandemic, Attorney General William Barr doesn’t expect a delay. Barr told the publication in March that the lawsuit would come to “fruition early summer.”

In a statement to The Wall Street Journal, a Google spokesperson said the company will continue to comply with the investigation by the Justice Department and declined to give any “updates or comments on speculation.”

“Our focus is firmly on providing services that help consumers, support thousands of businesses, and enable increased choice and competition.”

The New York Times confirmed the Journal’s report, citing two people who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the details were confidential. The regulators are focused on Google’s dominance in the online advertising industry, the Times confirmed, and the case will also involve allegations that the company abused its dominant position in online search to harm competitors, the people said.

It is still unclear whether individual states will have to follow suit, or hop on the federal case once it is filed. Litigation is still a possibility, but there has not been any indication of that yet, according to the outlet.

Last summer, the Justice Department announced that it would be opening a broad antitrust investigation into the nation’s largest tech companies, which included Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Apple.

Meira Gebel
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Meira Gebel is a freelance reporter based in Portland. She writes about tech, social media, and internet culture for Digital…
Google just gave vision to AI, but it’s still not available for everyone
Gemini Live App on the Galaxy S25 Ultra broadcast to a TV showing the Gemini app with the camera feature open

Google has just officially announced the roll out of a powerful Gemini AI feature that means the intelligence can now see.

This started in March as Google began to show off Gemini Live, but it's now become more widely available.

Read more
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more