Skip to main content

World Health Organization says ‘Immunity Passports’ are a bad idea

 

As the world grapples with when and whether to lift social distancing restrictions imposed due to the pandemic of coronavirus, officially called COVID-19, one suggestion that has been floated is the use of “immunity passports.” The idea is that people could be tested to see if they have the antibodies to coronavirus, which is one indication that they may have developed immunity to the virus. Those who have antibodies could be issued passport-like documents that would allow them to travel or work in areas where the virus is still widespread.

Recommended Videos

But the World Health Organization (WHO) wants to put the kibosh on that plan. This week, it released a scientific briefing warning that even people who have antibodies may be vulnerable to being reinfected. So just because you have had coronavirus once, that doesn’t necessarily mean you won’t get it again. This makes the idea of immunity passports unfeasible.

“At this point in the pandemic, there is not enough evidence about the effectiveness of antibody-mediated immunity to guarantee the accuracy of an ‘immunity passport’ or ‘risk-free certificate.’,” the WHO briefing read. “People who assume that they are immune to a second infection because they have received a positive test result may ignore public health advice.”

Antibodies are produced by the body as part of its immune response to a virus. These antibodies bind to the virus and neutralize it. Several studies have shown that people who recover from coronavirus do have specific antibodies for the virus. However, there is also a second response which is relevant, called cellular immunity, in which the body’s T-cells recognize and eliminate cells that are already infected with the virus.

The problem with antibody tests is that some people who have recovered from coronavirus have only low levels of antibodies, so it looks as if cellular immunity is also important in recovering. It’s possible that people with antibodies could become re-infected if they don’t have sufficient cellular immunity.

Another issue is that tests for COVID-19 are very new, and like any diagnostic test, can show false positives or false negatives. Also, as COVID-19 is only one of a family of six coronaviruses known to affect humans, an antibody test may not be able to distinguish between antibodies for COVID-19 and antibodies for one of the milder viruses which are common and cause cold-like symptoms.

Research into antibody tests will continue and it’s possible that new findings will make the tests more accurate and reliable. But for now, it looks like immunity passports won’t be a good solution to the current crisis.

For the latest updates on the novel coronavirus outbreak, visit the World Health Organization’s COVID-19 page.

Georgina Torbet
Georgina has been the space writer at Digital Trends space writer for six years, covering human space exploration, planetary…
Google just gave vision to AI, but it’s still not available for everyone
Gemini Live App on the Galaxy S25 Ultra broadcast to a TV showing the Gemini app with the camera feature open

Google has just officially announced the roll out of a powerful Gemini AI feature that means the intelligence can now see.

This started in March as Google began to show off Gemini Live, but it's now become more widely available.

Read more
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more