Save the pseudonyms: Why having multiple online personalities is not a disorder

online-personalities-social-network

Google and Facebook made waves with their policies on online identity: Essentially, one person should have one identity. My name is “Caleb Garling” on Facebook and Google; that’s the extent to which Facebook and Google (attempt to) allow me to be “present.” The argument goes: you are yourself online and as such, there is no need to have multiple logins or user names. Yet, I’d argue such a bucketing isn’t, in fact, natural; that having different online personalities is completely normal, and a custom we carry over from the offline world.

We may have one body, one brain, one set of eyes, ears and a single pie hole, but why should the Internet hold you hostage to a singular persona? Simply because you are a singular person? That’s not even how it works in the offline world.

I bet you pull back or unleash your politics depending on the company. I bet you don’t act the same at work as you do when you’re sharing a bottle of wine with an old roommate. I bet you shake hands differently with friends than you do strangers. I bet you don’t act the same in a job interview as you do on a road trip with your siblings. I bet you even find yourself laughing differently, depending on whom you’re with.

People vary behavior by situation. Obviously. Social partitions are a natural component of our world. We act one way here, another there, and differently in between. In some ways, the various releases keep us sane. It’s nice to get a little goofy sometimes. It’s nice to get a little worked up sometimes. It’s nice to get serious and “down to business” sometimes.

So why should social networks hold us back from what is natural? Sure, we can fiddle with the settings for what ends up showing up on our news feed, but that singular identity still attaches itself to whatever comment we’ve made or activity we’ve done.

From a pragmatic and business-driven perspective, of course the uniformity makes sense: it keeps data in order. When Facebook says it has 750 million users, you think 750 million people (humans) are using Facebook. But really, 50 million of them could have two profiles. And that’s just at the marketing level; when you get into the revenue engine—targeted advertisements—it becomes imperative that they have a clear view of exactly who someone is. Facebook doesn’t want obsessed-with-online-gaming-You and everyday-You living separate lives.

Many content sites, media, news and opinion alike, require a Facebook, Twitter or Google login to comment on articles. What you say will be tied back to your bigger persona; you can’t hide behind the wall of a false account. As an Internet writer, I can tell you that I’ve received “feedback” from readers that I don’t necessarily appreciate—and there is a predictable correlation between viciousness and anonymity. But, the arguments goes, the real world doesn’t usually work like that; if you want to get nasty, expect eye contact or at least to sign your name.

But does it? To use the most classic example, anyone could yell “bomb” in a movie theater and get away with the false alarm. I could cut out letters from a newspaper and make a hurtful message to a co-worker. Rarely have I noticed (traceable) signatures on graffiti. The tangible world is full of anonymous messaging.

So perhaps that’s a defining quality of social networks: it squeezes people from the fringes, finally makes every accountable for their words. We’re all connected now. No more hiding. You can say what you’d like, but if you’re going to be plugged into the greater matrices of communication, we’re going to know that you said it.

Is that a good thing? We’ll see. But it’s not natural.

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not reflect the beliefs of Digital Trends.

Computing

Facebook’s Libra could be dead on arrival, if India stands by its proposed ban

The government of India has announced that it is considering a ban on Facebook's new cryptocurrency, Libra. Without this key market, the success of the burgeoning cryptocurrency is in serious doubt.
Home Theater

How Amazon and Google’s streaming feud helped make Roku the streaming king

Amazon and Google are finally playing nice when it comes to streaming, with YouTube now available on Fire TV devices, and Amazon Prime Video available on Chromecast. Here's how remaining agnostic helped Roku leap ahead of the pack.
Home Theater

Netflix built a TV empire without ads. Here’s why it’s time to consider them

In an increasingly compacted and complex streaming landscape, Netflix is going to have to once again innovate to stay at the head of the pack. While adding commercials would be met with controversy, it could just be a saving grace.
Mobile

No, the Pixel 4’s bezels are not a major crime against smartphone design

Leaks have shown us what the Google Pixel may look like from the front, and the bezels around the screen have sent the masses into a panic, claiming the design is outdated and ugly. Except it's not, and here's why.
Computing

Why recent hacks show Apple’s security strength, not its weakness

It may sound strange, but the recent stories about vulnerabilities in Apple’s security could be good news for the firm. That’s because they went a long way to highlighting its strengths -- and the strengths it has traditionally had over…
Movies & TV

The new 007 is a woman. What does this mean for James Bond’s future?

According to the latest rumors, the new 007 will be played by Lashana Lynch, a black woman, in Bond 25, but don't worry. Ian Fleming's macho, womanizing superspy isn't going anywhere.
Movies & TV

Cringeworthy Cats trailer reminds us we’re not out of the Uncanny Valley yet

The first Cats trailer offers a disturbing reminder of how easy it still is for films that rely heavily on CG effects blended with human performances to slip into the Uncanny Valley of troubling visual elements.
Opinion

Enough is enough: It’s time to break up big tech companies

Antitrust investigations are needed when a business’ sheer bulk is abused, when innovative smaller companies are squashed, and when consumers are impacted. And frankly, that’s a very real problem in the tech world today.
Gaming

The Nintendo Switch Lite may not impress you, but that’s not the point

The Nintendo Switch Lite is a portable-only version of the Nintendo Switch that is missing several of its features. It won't appeal to hardcore Switch players, but that doesn't matter.
Mobile

With voice and gestures, Google’s Pixel 4 takes us closer to a hands-free future

If we combine the features, we know are coming in the Pixel 4 -- gestures, face unlock, and better voice commands – we can clearly see that Google is leading the way towards a hands-free future. But how will it get there?
Mobile

Here are 10 ways your cell phone carrier is screwing you

If you want to use your smartphone then you have little choice but to sign up to a service plan with a cell phone carrier. Sadly, carriers are adept at ripping us off, unnecessarily blocking features, throttling data speeds, and more.
Movies & TV

The Replacements: How Mighty Thor shows superhero swaps are the MCU’s future

Chris Evans, Robert Downey Jr., and others are finished with Marvel, but there's no reason why Captain America, Iron Man, and the rest can't live on. Here's how Mighty Thor proves superhero swaps are key to the MCU's future.
Computing

What’s the best way to stick it to Equifax? Make them work for you

If you're among those whose data was compromised by the Equifax data breach, you're probably not going to get the $125 promised by the FTC settlement. If you want to make Equifax pay, you're better off choosing free credit monitoring.
Opinion

Is it still coming? The Samsung Galaxy Home has an uphill battle

The absence of the Samsung Galaxy Home during Samsung's Unpacked event for the Note 10 makes you wonder more about the future of this Bixby powered smart speaker. Samsung says they're continuing to refine and enhance the Galaxy Home prior…