Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Photography
  3. Opinion
  4. Features

The Fujifilm X-T4 looks flawless. Is it the perfect camera?

Add as a preferred source on Google

It feels early to be excited about a new X-T camera, but here I am. Fujifilm has unveiled the X-T4 after openly teasing it for weeks, and I’m in a tizzy. (See what’s new in our X-T4 versus X-T3 comparison.)

I’ve reviewed every Fujifilm X-T camera since the X-T1, including the downmarket two- and three-digits models. I have tested  the changes, big and small, that each generation brought. Each new flagship camera took a revolutionary leap over the previous one. The X-T4 is a bit different.

Fujifilm X-T4
Daven Mathies/Digital Trends

The sensor, processor, and electronic viewfinder — things that no other single-digit X-T cameras share — are carried over from the X-T3. Instead of all-new internals for the new Fujifilm X-T4, Fujifilm is refining what was already an excellent camera, and ironing out the few remaining wrinkles.

In reviewing previous X-T models, I’ve listed a series of recurring cons. These include poor battery life, limited LCD articulation, and the lack of in-body image stabilization. For generations, these were the pain points Fujifilm customers accepted in exchange for an expertly crafted, compact, and otherwise excellent mirrorless camera. The X-T4 addresses all of these points.

That’s great news for photographers, but as a reviewer, I’m worried. I always want to offer criticism of a camera, no matter how good it is, but the new Fujifilm X-T4 might leave me stumped.

The X-T4 is a big deal

Of all the improvements the X-T4 brings to the table, its new 5-axis in-body image stabilization (IBIS) is the most important — and most impressive.

It was just few years ago that Fujifilm claimed sensor-shift image stabilization was incompatible with the X series due to limitations of the lens mount design. There simply wasn’t room to let the sensor to move without sacrificing image quality.

The Fujifilm X-H1 challenged that, but it was physically larger than the X-T series, giving Fujifilm’s engineers more room to work. Though the dimensions of the lens mount remained the same, they were still able to deliver a stabilization system that, as far as I could tell, had no effect on image quality.

In fact, when I reviewed the X-T3, I mentioned some customers may prefer to wait for the eventual X-H2, a camera that might combine the tech of the X-T3 with in-body stabilization. The X-T4 proves Fujifilm doesn’t want its customers waiting for anything. Buy this thing now. (The X-H2 is apparently still in the works, if you believe the rumors, but likely not to arrive this year.)

Image used with permission by copyright holder

There are Fujifilm fans out there who will say the series never needed image stabilization, and still doesn’t. After all, Fujifilm has used the tagline “the soul of film in a digital world,” and what film camera ever had in-body stabilization?

But times have changed. Fujifilm isn’t a niche brand anymore, and its X-T cameras compete head-to-head with Sony’s popular A6000 line, which had IBIS in its last two flagship models. Add in the X-T4’s vari-angle screen and larger battery, and Sony’s last remaining advantages have vanished.

At this point, the other novel features of the X-T4 — like the mechanical shutter than can shoot 15 frames per second, and improved autofocus that’s sensitive to -6 EV — are just icing on the cake.

Keep an eye on this camera

Perhaps I am being too hasty in my race to praise the X-T4. Unlike some technology journalists who had a chance to play with it at Fujifilm’s special event, I have not had any hands-on time with it. But, much of its physical design and underlying technology are a known quantity. Unless the hinge on the vari-angle screen breaks or the stabilization simply doesn’t work, this will be the camera that erases every complaint I’ve ever made about the X-T series.

That won’t mean it’s a perfect camera for everyone, of course. There are limitations of the APS-C sensor size, and some photographers don’t enjoy the analog-inspired control scheme. Still, I think the X-T4 will be the best camera at its price, even though the price is $200 more than the X-T3. I’m going to have to do some serious nitpicking, and find new things to complain about.

Challenge accepted.

Price and Availability

The Fujifilm X-T4 will and is expected to hit stores in spring of 2020.

Daven Mathies
Daven is a contributing writer to the photography section. He has been with Digital Trends since 2016 and has been writing…
Fujifilm Instax Mini 13 review: This instant camera won me over with its no-frills retro charm
From printing instant memories to rediscovering the fading charm of polaroids, Fujifilm's camera offers a budget route to a simple indulgence.
Fujifilm Instax mini 13 camera.

See at Amazon

Quick review

Read more
Want to try film photography? Kodak’s new $35 camera is a great place to start
This retro inspired Kodak EC35 camera keeps film photography refreshingly simple.
Kodak-EC35

If you've been curious about film photography but didn't want to spend a fortune, Kodak has a new camera worth checking out. The new Kodak EC35 is a reusable 35mm point-and-shoot camera that costs just $34.99, making it one of the most affordable ways to try shooting on film.

Developed by Reto Project under the Kodak brand, the EC35 keeps things simple with a lightweight design, automatic flash, and a pocket-friendly body. It also arrives as interest in analog photography continues to grow, offering beginners an inexpensive alternative to disposable film cameras.

Read more
The FCC’s latest crackdown could put more than DJI drones at risk in the US
Robot, Person, Face

DJI may have found creative ways to keep some of its products flowing into the US, but those efforts are now drawing increased attention from regulators. According to The Verge, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has started cracking down on several companies it believes could be helping DJI continue selling products in the country. These businesses have been described by industry observers as "DJI front companies" because they market or import products that appear to be closely tied to the Chinese drone maker while operating under different brand names.

DJI's alleged back door may be closing

Read more