Skip to main content

Postal Service ordered to pay $3.5M for its Lady Liberty stamp blunder


We can safely assume that the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) felt rather proud of its Statue of Liberty Forever stamp when it released it in 2010.

But three months after its launch, the USPS discovered that instead of showing the Statue of Liberty in New York City, the stamp actually featured a photo of a half-size replica in Las Vegas (above). Three billion of the stamps had been printed before the mistake was noticed.

Instead of trashing the stamps, the USPS continued to sell them, with an official insisting at the time that even if they’d realized it wasn’t the actual statue, it “would have selected this photograph anyway” because it fit the desired stamp design perfectly.

The stamp was finally retired in 2014, but only because the creator of the Las Vegas statue, Robert Davidson, decided to sue the USPS over copyright infringement. The legal battle has just ended with the USPS being hit with a $3.5 million judgment.

According to the Associated Press, Davidson’s attorneys argued that his Lady Liberty was unmistakably different from the original as it was more “fresh-faced,” ″sultry,” and also “sexier.”

Fighting back, attorneys for the USPS insisted Davidson’s design was too similar for him to be able to claim copyright infringement.

Bringing the case to a close last week, Federal Judge Eric Bruggink sided with Davidson and ordered the USPS to pay him $3.5 million, which it can comfortably take from the $70 million profit that the stamp reportedly generated from nearly five billion sales.

Todd Bice, representing Davidson, told the Associated Press that his client was happy with the outcome, adding, “As the court noted, Mr. Davidson’s artistic creation of the Las Vegas Lady Liberty is highly unique and attractive, which is what prompted the U.S. Postal Service to select a photo of his work … over hundreds of other images.”

The USPS said it’s still reviewing the judge’s decision and may comment later.

So how exactly did the USPS find the image of Davidson’s statue, and how did the mix-up occur?

Well, it bought a license to use the photo after finding it on Getty Images, a photo library that represents hundreds of thousands of photographers around the world.

The photo of Davidson’s statue was taken by Raimund Linke. While the image was titled “Statue of Liberty,” the accompanying keywords noted that it was a “Statue of Liberty replica” in “Las Vegas.” But the USPS failed to notice, resulting in an error that’s ended up costing it millions of dollars.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Canon’s smallest EOS R camera just got a $200 discount
Canon EOS R100 mirrorless camera with lens attached

Target is an excellent source of camera deals. Just last week it had a $300 discount on the Fujifilm X-T50 mirrorless digital camera bundle, and today it has an amazing offer for the Canon EOS R100. From its original price of $600, the mirrorless camera is down to a more affordable $400, for $200 in savings. We're not sure how long you have to take advantage of this offer though, so if you're interested in making this purchase, you should probably complete the transaction right now if you want to enjoy the 33% discount.

Why you should buy the Canon EOS R100 mirrorless camera
The Canon EOS R100 is the smallest model in the brand's EOS R series of mirrorless cameras, which makes it a perfect choice for rookie photographers. Unlike a DSLR camera, which uses a mirror for their optical viewfinder, a mirrorless camera uses an imaging sensor for a digital preview of the picture that you're planning to take. The lack of the mirror makes mirrorless cameras much smaller than DSLR cameras, and that's very apparent with the Canon EOS R100, as it only measures about 6.1 inches by 7.9 inches by 7.6 inches, and it weights just about 2 pounds.

Read more
The best photo printers you can buy in 2024
Alan compares draft, standard, and high-quality photos from Epson's EcoTank ET-8500.

If you love sharing photo prints or building physical photo albums, you might want to upgrade to a photo printer. When manufacturers optimize printers for pictures, the results often exceed the image quality of the best printers available.

Compared to sending photos to a lab or printing at a local office store, you have faster feedback and more control when you create pictures on your own photo printer. If you decide a print would benefit from a color or exposure adjustment, you can quickly make that change and print again with minimal delay. A printer that handles photos well offers instant gratification and convenience, while saving you money on print costs from a photo lab.

Read more
Adobe Photoshop or Adobe Lightroom: Which should you choose to edit your photos?
project felix lighting tool adobe beta

Within Adobe's Creative Cloud Suite, there are two programs designed specifically with photographers in mind: Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Lightroom.

At first glance, these two programs might appear redundant, as they're both made with the goal of editing photographs of all kinds. But the truth is, each program is designed with a different purpose in mind, and each offers a distinct post-production photography workflow.
Photoshop vs. Lightroom
In the most simple terms, Adobe Photoshop is effectively a digital darkroom, where you can make detailed adjustments and alterations to any kind of image. Adobe Lightroom, on the other hand, is closer to an entire photography studio, as it imports, organizes, edits, and exports photographs.

Read more