Skip to main content

Famed photojournalist Steve McCurry speaks out on his use of Photoshop

steve mccurry photoshop controversy img 5550
John Ramspott/Flickr (used under Creative Commons)
Where do photojournalists draw the line between processing a photograph and changing its integrity?That’s the question photographer Steve McCurry is facing after multiple versions of his images were uncovered online, some completely removing or adding elements to the scene. McCurry, the photographer behind National Geographic’s arguably most memorable cover photo of an Afgan girl with deep blue eyes, recently released a statement, saying he would rein in his use of Photoshop, but that he also no longer classified himself as a photojournalist, but a visual storyteller.

“I’ve always let my pictures do the talking, but now I understand that people want me to describe the category into which I would put myself, and so today I would say that I am a visual storyteller,” McCurry told Time Magazine. “The years of covering conflict zones are in the distant past. Except for a brief time at a local newspaper in Pennsylvania, I have never been an employee of a newspaper, news magazine, or other news outlet. I have always freelanced.”

The reason why McCurry has to defend in work started in May, when a photographer spotted an error in one of McCurry’s prints at a show in Italy. The image appeared to have an incomplete cloning, where the bottom of a sign post appeared twice and a pedestrian’s foot was missing. McCurry responded by saying the error was made by a former member of his team while he was traveling.

Since the initial report, several people have found Photoshopped images by McCurry, largely when multiple versions of the same image were posted on his website. While many images contain simple color adjustments, several remove distractions from the image, cloning out entire people in some cases. While the adjustments wouldn’t have been an issue for, say, a fine art portrait, McCurry’s long history as a photojournalist brought criticism to his post-processing methods.

“Some of my work has migrated into the fine art field and is now in private collections and museums,” he said. “I understand that it’s virtually impossible to assign me to a specific category or classification, but that’s partly a function of working for 40 years, and having a career which has evolved as media itself has changed.”

The initial Photoshopped image was part of a gallery, not a newspaper publication. As for McCurry’s work for National Geographic, the publication’s director of photography, Sarah Leen, said it has a rigorous process for images, receiving all the RAW files and doing their own color correction. McCurry’s “Afghan Girl” image was shot on Kodak film.

Still, McCurry says that, moving forward, he will limit his use of Photoshop, even for his personal work.

Hillary K. Grigonis
Hillary never planned on becoming a photographer—and then she was handed a camera at her first writing job and she's been…
How to remove location data from your iPhone photos
How to transfer photos from an iPhone to an iPhone

We all love making memories, and a great way to collect those memories is to take a quick snap of a gorgeous landscape, a party in full swing, or a particularly incredible meal. The Apple iPhone now also adds a location to your pictures, meaning it can collate those images together into a location-themed album, or show you all the shots you've taken in a specific location. It's a fun little addition, and it's one that adds a lot of personality to the Photos app.

Read more
‘Photoshopped’ royal photo causes a stir
The Princess of Wales with her children.

[UPDATE: In a message posted on social media on Monday morning, Princess Kate said that she herself edited the image, and apologized for the fuss that the picture had caused. “Like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing," she wrote, adding, "I wanted to express my apologies for any confusion the family photograph we shared yesterday caused."]

Major press agencies have pulled a photo of the U.K.’s Princess of Wales and her children amid concerns that it has been digitally manipulated.

Read more
Nikon sale: Get up to $700 off select Nikon cameras and lenses
nikon d780 review product  1

Crutchfield has a huge sale on many different Nikon cameras with some of the best camera deals that we’ve seen in a while. With nearly 30 different items in the sale, the best thing that avid photographers can do is take a look for themselves. However, if you want a little insight before you dive in, take a look at what we have to suggest below.

What to shop for in the Nikon sale
Nikon makes some of the best DSLR cameras around with our overall favorite -- the -- available for $2,197 reduced from $2,297. The camera is perfect for both photographers and videographers with a 24.5-megapixel full-frame image sensor. Its rugged magnesium-alloy body is weather-sealed against dust, dirt, and moisture so it’s great for all occasions. The Nikon EXPEED 6 image processor is optimized for low-light performance while maintaining long battery life with an autofocus sensor module with support for 51 focus points. You just need to add a lens to reap the benefits with features like the 273-point phase-detection AF system detecting and tracking subjects throughout the entire frame.

Read more