Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Facebook admits it didn’t actually remove Kenosha militia event

Add as a preferred source on Google

Facebook reversed its statement that it took action to take down a now-infamous Kenosha militia event that was shared shortly before a deadly shooting during protests in Wisconsin. 

An event posted by the Kenosha Guard Facebook group was taken down by the page’s moderators and not Facebook, according to a Buzzfeed report that cited internal documents from Facebook.

Recommended Videos

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg previously said that the company took down the page for violating its “Dangerous Individuals and Organizations” policy regarding militia organizations. Facebook initially claimed the event was removed by Facebook, but it was actually the page’s moderators who took the event down.

A Facebook spokesperson told Digital Trends that they “apologize for the error.”

“When we responded to questions about our initial investigation into what happened in Kenosha, we believed we’d removed the Event Page for violating our policies,” the spokesperson said. “Our investigation found that while we did remove the Kenosha Guard Page, the event page was removed by the organizer.”

The page was originally made in response to the police shooting of 29-year-old Jacob Blake and the protests that followed.

Mark Zuckerberg
Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

The Kenosha Guard Facebook event called for its followers to take up arms and “defend our city tonight from the evil thugs.”

The page was taken down after 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse was arrested and charged with first-degree intentional homicide in connection to a shooting during these protests, which left two dead and one injured. It’s unclear where Rittenhouse was directly connected to the event.

Aside from Facebook failing to take down the event themselves, the social network also reportedly ignored multiple reports from users about the Kenosha group before the protests escalated. There were 455 reports sent to Facebook about the event page, according to Buzzfeed.

At the time, Facebook said the page did not violate its policies, but Zuckerberg has since said that Facebook’s failure to take action against the event inciting violence was an “operational mistake.” 

Zuckerberg added that Facebook would evolve its policies and execute its content moderation efforts in a video posted last week. However, Facebook has faced criticism for failing to act quickly against extremism on its platform and for dodging responsibility for how content on Facebook can incite real-world violence. 

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more