Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Legacy Archives

Facebook blasts man who claims to own the social network, may not know what it’s talking about

Add as a preferred source on Google

facebookFacebook returned fire Thursday at Paul Ceglia, a New York wood pellet salesman who claims to own half the social network, calling him “an inveterate scam artist” who is simply trying to con his way into billions of dollars, reports The New York Times. Unfortunately, the company has no idea whether the emails Ceglia used to back up his claims are fake or not.

According to Ceglia, Facebook co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg agreed to give him 50 percent of his stake in the company, way back in 2003, for helping to develop the site. If true, that would make him the rightful recipient of about $13.5 billion. Facebook, however, isn’t shelling out its riches without a fight.

Recommended Videos

“This lawsuit is a brazen and outrageous fraud on the court,” Facebook wrote in its official response to Ceglia’s legal action. “Plaintiff is an inveterate scam artist whose misconduct extends across decades and borders. His latest and most far-reaching fraud is the amended complaint filed in this action, which is based upon a doctored contract and fabricated evidence. Plaintiff alleges that he recently ‘discovered’ a purported contract that now supposedly entitles him to ownership of 50 percent of Zuckerberg’s interest in Facebook. The purported contract was signed in 2003, yet plaintiff waited until 2010 to file this action — a seven-year delay during which plaintiff remained utterly silent while Facebook grew into one of the world’s best-known companies. Plaintiff has now come out of the woodwork seeking billions in damages.

If Facebook could back up its assertions that Ceglia’s case is, in fact, “based upon a doctored contract and fabricated evidence,” that would be one thing. According to Business Insider’s reading of the company’s response, however, Facebook really has no idea whether or not the emails are fake.

“Zuckerberg denies the allegations….  Facebook denies the allegations on the basis that it lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained therein,” writes Facebook in its response.

This statement is meant to contradict Ceglia. But what it is really saying is that Zuckerberg says the emails are fake, but Facebook, Zuckerberg’s employer, has no way to prove that they are fake.

Because of this ambiguity, we can say with certainty that this case is far from over.

Andrew Couts
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
Instagram will limit reach for AI influencers who skip AI-generated label on their profile
Instagram tightens AI influencer disclosure rules with a clearer profile label
instagram-ai-generated-profiles

Instagram just drew a hard line around AI influencers pretending to be real people. The platform is renaming its old AI creator label to AI-generated profile, and this time it comes with penalties too. Accounts featuring a fully AI-generated person will see their reach cut if they skip the label, meaning your feed is about to get a lot more honest about who is actually behind the account.

So what counts as an AI-generated profile?

Read more
Bluesky now has a feature to save you from accidentally going viral. I want it everywhere.
Bluesky now lets users opt out of its algorithmic Discover feed.
Social profile page of Bluesky.

There's a specific kind of dread that comes with posting something small and watching it explode to a million strangers who missed all the context. Thankfully, Bluesky just built an escape hatch to avoid this horror. The platform now lets you opt out of its algorithmic Discover feed, meaning your posts stop getting pushed to people who don't already follow you.

How Bluesky's algorithmic opt-out feature works

Read more
Meta’s new teen restrictions will only apply to users in the US for now
Facebook and Instagram teens are getting new limits on screen time and content
Facebook logo on iPhone

Meta is implementing new restrictions on U.S. teens who use Facebook and Instagram, but the changes could have repercussions far beyond U.S. screens. Meta’s new protections come after a series of settlements relating to allegations that social media sites endanger children, with the company facing as much as $18 billion in expenses.

For now, the new rules will be applied only to U.S. users. The measures include limitations on how long younger users can spend on Meta’s apps and limits on their ability to disable certain safety settings, Bloomberg reported. The company says it will watch the changes and continue discussions with governments elsewhere.

Read more