Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Facebook’s automated hate speech detection is getting even better

Add as a preferred source on Google
Promotional image for Tech For Change. Person standing on solar panel looking at sunset.
This story is part of Tech for Change: an ongoing series in which we shine a spotlight on positive uses of technology, and showcase how they're helping to make the world a better place.

Facebook’s proactive hate speech detection technology has gotten much better, according to a new report. 

The social network published the sixth edition of its Community Standards Enforcement Report on Tuesday, August 11. The big takeaway is that the company is getting better at detecting hate speech instances. The report looked at data from the second quarter of this year. 

Recommended Videos

According to the report, Facebook’s proactive detection rate for hate speech is now 95%, compared to 89% from the first quarter of 2020. Facebook said it increased its actions against hate speech content from 9.6 million instances in the first quarter of the year to 22.5 million in the second quarter. 

“Thanks to both improvements in our technology and the return of some content reviewers, we saw increases in the amount of content we took action on connected to organized hate on Instagram and bullying and harassment on both Facebook and Instagram,” wrote Guy Rosen, Facebook’s vice president of integrity, in a blog post. 

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Facebook said that expanding its automation to more languages like Spanish and Burmese allowed it to take action against more hate speech content. 

Another area Facebook has been improving on is terrorism content. The platform said it increased its actions against terrorism content from 96.3 million instances in the first quarter to 8.7 million in the second quarter. 

To increase these numbers even further, Facebook is experimenting with an army of malicious bots as a way to research anti-spam methods and preempt bad behaviors. The A.I. bots are programmed to simulate extreme scenarios, such as hate speech, to test how Facebook’s algorithms would try to prevent them.

Facebook is clearly trying to be more transparent with its content moderation practices and how it implements them. To take it one step further, the social network is even asking external auditors to conduct an independent audit of future Community Standards Enforcement Reports. Facebook said it would conduct this independent audit next year and have the auditors publish their findings. 

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
Meta just pulled its most controversial AI image generation feature days after launch
Meta is framing this as "hearing feedback," not as fixing a consent problem.
Instagram Muse Image

A couple of days ago, I covered Meta’s announcement of the Muse Image, an AI tool that lets users generate images based on someone’s Instagram profile without asking the account owner. 

I also highlighted the risks associated with it in another piece, along with steps for opting out. Three days later, the feature is no longer available. 

Read more
Your YouTube playlists can now become actual TV shows, but there’s a catch you need to know
YouTube just gave Partner Program creators the episodic infrastructure that Netflix has been using to keep audiences hooked for years.
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

YouTube just gave its creators a tool that streaming platforms take for granted. I’m talking about the ability to structure content as proper episodic TV. 

If you're in the YouTube Partner Program and you’ve been organizing your videos into playlists while praying that the algorithm and your audience notice, then Shows is the upgrade you've been waiting for.

Read more
I knew there was plenty of AI slop on LinkedIn. Shocking report says the problem is far worse than suspected
LinkedIn app on App Store iPhone

I already knew LinkedIn was overflowing with posts written by AI, recycled leadership advice, and those god-awful lessons about entrepreneurship. A new report suggests the situation is considerably worse than even the platform’s feed makes it appear.

AI-detection company Pangram analyzed more than one million posts scanned through its Chrome extension across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, Medium, and Substack. LinkedIn represented approximately one-third of everything scanned, yet produced 62% of all content Pangram flagged as AI-generated.

Read more