Skip to main content

Google+ may have ultimately killed Google Reader

Google Reader
Image used with permission by copyright holder

On July 1 this year, Google Reader will cease to exist. Google cites the decline in userbase as the main reason why the service is shutting down, but turns out that those who do use Reader are a bunch of faithful, devoted folks who even launched a petition to keep it running. But if you ask former Google Reader product manager Brian Shih, declining userbase might not be the only reason why Google is axing the service – Google+ might also be to blame. 

In Shih’s post on question-and-answer website Quora, he detailed his views on why Google+ could have contributed to the RSS reader’s demise. He prefaced the lengthy post by emphasizing that Reader has never made money directly, and Google certainly isn’t shutting it down because its (nonexistent) revenues can’t cover its operating costs. The first reason why he thinks Reader is shutting down partly due to Google+ is because the company has apparently been allocating personnel from the Reader team into other projects – mostly projects that had something to do with social – for years.

It began in 2008, when the company launched the OpenSocial project, which aimed to develop social Web applications that work on all platforms. In 2009, more engineers were recruited out of the Reader team to work on Buzz, it’s pre-Google+ social network that was killed off in 2011.  Finally, even more people left the Reader team when Google+ was launched in 2010. “I suspect that [Google Reader] survived for some time after being put into maintenance, because they believed it could still be a useful source of content into G+,” Shih writes.

Devoted Reader users sift through a lot of content and share many of what they come across, which is why the company ultimately introduced integrated Google+ sharing, so people can +1 a story straight out of their RSS feeds. Google’s idea was sound  – it was hoping that giving users the option to share content on Google+ would be an incentive for more people to actively use its young social network. Unfortunately, Shih believes the plan backfired and that sharing ultimately declined, which means Reader has outlived its usefulness. For a company that’s looking to dedicate its resources to its more successful products, the RSS reader’s death is nothing but inevitable. 

Shih warns that he left Google in 2011, and all of these are merely speculations. Still, everything he said makes sense, so we have to ask – do you agree with Shih that Google+ has somehow contributed to Reader’s death?

Editors' Recommendations

Mariella Moon
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Mariella loves working on both helpful and awe-inspiring science and technology stories. When she's not at her desk writing…
Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google will testify before Congress in July
Google & Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai

The top chief executives from Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google will all appear before Congress in late July for an antitrust hearing, according to Recode's Kara Swisher.

Most of the tech giants have appeared before Congress in the past, some multiple times, on an array of issues ranging from data mining to political bias, but this hearing would be the first on antitrust concerns. According to Swisher, Amazon's Jeff Bezos, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Google's Sundar Pichai, and Apple head Tim Cook will all participate in the hearing.

Read more
Google Duo adds four new features to help ease us through lockdown
google duo adds four new features for better video calls

Stay-at-home orders prompted by the coronavirus pandemic have seen video-calling numbers go through the roof.

Whether with family, friends, or co-workers, more people than ever have been firing up their chat app of choice as a way to connect with others while we're prevented from meeting in person.

Read more
Google scraps its April Fools’ jokes in wake of coronavirus
Google's Logo

Google is reportedly canceling its April Fools' Day jokes this year because of the spreading coronavirus pandemic.

The annual tradition was scrapped because execs feared the glib pranks would appear to be in poor taste, according to an internal email obtained by Business Insider.

Read more