Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Web
  4. Legacy Archives

Google’s Google+ strategy: Evil, but still working

Add as a preferred source on Google
google plus hangout nfl sports football
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Remember when Google started forcing its users to create Google+ profiles? Last year, Google implemented a feature requiring users who signed up for new Google accounts — Gmail, YouTube, Google Wallet, and others — to automatically create Google+ profiles, regardless of if they wanted one or not. The move, at the time, smacked of hypocrisy, sparking discussions of Google finally, if somewhat unsurprisingly, closing the book on Don’t Be Evil, as it seemed Google had sacrificed its ethos for the sake of ads and competing with a perhaps greater evil in Facebook.

But Google can still pat itself on the back. While the move has caused contention among users and even within Google’s own rank-and-file, it appears to be working, increasing engagement with G+ in a way that Facebook may actually start worrying about.

Recommended Videos

According to the Wall Street Journal, integration across Google’s services into Google+ has resulted in 235 million people using Google+ features as of last month, up from 150 million last June. That correlates with increased click-through rates on brands Google+ Pages, ranging between two percent and 15 percent.

And Google executives promise that more integration is coming, as Google slowly but surely redefines its product around its social network, all in the hope of pulling people away from Facebook.

Google competes directly with Facebook for ad dollars based on how users interact with content on their sites. While Google makes $40 billion annually based on advertising across their myriad services and platforms, Facebook is better equipped to direct ads at individuals based on their personal activities, tying those habits to their real names. While Google’s Senior Vice President of Engineering and Google+ head Vic Gundotra has in the past assured users that Google doesn’t intend on using people’s real names to craft advertising, linking search habits, restaurant recommendations, and +1s better enables the company to direct people to products they may like.

This, of course, should surprise no one, as Google’s app ecosystem is quickly becoming ubiquitous. One thing, however, is certain: Google has no intention of changing course now, especially when it means positive growth for their social network.

Kwame Opam
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kwame graduated from Stony Brook University with BA in Anthropology and has a Masters in Media Studies. He's done stints at…
Meta just pulled its most controversial AI image generation feature days after launch
Meta is framing this as "hearing feedback," not as fixing a consent problem.
Instagram Muse Image

A couple of days ago, I covered Meta’s announcement of the Muse Image, an AI tool that lets users generate images based on someone’s Instagram profile without asking the account owner. 

I also highlighted the risks associated with it in another piece, along with steps for opting out. Three days later, the feature is no longer available. 

Read more
Your YouTube playlists can now become actual TV shows, but there’s a catch you need to know
YouTube just gave Partner Program creators the episodic infrastructure that Netflix has been using to keep audiences hooked for years.
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

YouTube just gave its creators a tool that streaming platforms take for granted. I’m talking about the ability to structure content as proper episodic TV. 

If you're in the YouTube Partner Program and you’ve been organizing your videos into playlists while praying that the algorithm and your audience notice, then Shows is the upgrade you've been waiting for.

Read more
I knew there was plenty of AI slop on LinkedIn. Shocking report says the problem is far worse than suspected
LinkedIn app on App Store iPhone

I already knew LinkedIn was overflowing with posts written by AI, recycled leadership advice, and those god-awful lessons about entrepreneurship. A new report suggests the situation is considerably worse than even the platform’s feed makes it appear.

AI-detection company Pangram analyzed more than one million posts scanned through its Chrome extension across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, Medium, and Substack. LinkedIn represented approximately one-third of everything scanned, yet produced 62% of all content Pangram flagged as AI-generated.

Read more