Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

New York Times to start printing reporters’ tweets in new trending section

Add as a preferred source on Google

The New York Times will start highlighting the best and most relevant tweets from its reporting staff in a new section in its newspaper.

The move recognizes the importance of Twitter as a breaking news service, one that is used by Times’ reporters to reel off tweetstorms that can precede an article and elucidate it. As Nieman Lab’s Joshua Benton has previously pointed out, the Times has (until now) missed out on capitalizing on its reporters most relevant tweets.

Recommended Videos

The changes are part of a bigger effort to bridge the publisher’s digital and print content — what Jake Silverstein, editor-in-chief of The New York Times Magazine, described as a friendly relationship between the two mediums.

Tweets and social media activity will be highlighted in the Times’ redesigned A2 and A3 newspaper pages under the “Spotlight” banner. Most recently, the section included an Instagram post from T magazine’s Instagram account. In general, it will mostly be home to tweets from Times’ reporters, in the vein of the tweetstorms shared by the paper’s Islamic State and Al-Qaeda expert, Rukmini Callimachi.

The redesigned pages, which are presented in a magazine-like style, are “a step toward creating a print newspaper for a digital era,” according to executive editor Dean Baquet. Also included in the new section is a rundown of the Times’ most popular online posts, highlights from its audio and video content, and a mini-crossword puzzle, among other small features. The pages sound like the newspaper’s very own take on the trending tabs offered by social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook.

But that doesn’t mean the Times is using the section to push more of its readership online — after all, it doesn’t want its existing print readership to take any more of a hit in an era when the majority of people get their news online via those same social networks. Instead, its intended as a way to summarize the wide-ranging online reportage of the media outlet: “These things aren’t meant to be referrals to the digital experience, but small encapsulations,” Silverstein told Nieman Lab.

Saqib Shah
Saqib Shah is a Twitter addict and film fan with an obsessive interest in pop culture trends. In his spare time he can be…
Meta just pulled its most controversial AI image generation feature days after launch
Meta is framing this as "hearing feedback," not as fixing a consent problem.
Instagram Muse Image

A couple of days ago, I covered Meta’s announcement of the Muse Image, an AI tool that lets users generate images based on someone’s Instagram profile without asking the account owner. 

I also highlighted the risks associated with it in another piece, along with steps for opting out. Three days later, the feature is no longer available. 

Read more
Your YouTube playlists can now become actual TV shows, but there’s a catch you need to know
YouTube just gave Partner Program creators the episodic infrastructure that Netflix has been using to keep audiences hooked for years.
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

YouTube just gave its creators a tool that streaming platforms take for granted. I’m talking about the ability to structure content as proper episodic TV. 

If you're in the YouTube Partner Program and you’ve been organizing your videos into playlists while praying that the algorithm and your audience notice, then Shows is the upgrade you've been waiting for.

Read more
I knew there was plenty of AI slop on LinkedIn. Shocking report says the problem is far worse than suspected
LinkedIn app on App Store iPhone

I already knew LinkedIn was overflowing with posts written by AI, recycled leadership advice, and those god-awful lessons about entrepreneurship. A new report suggests the situation is considerably worse than even the platform’s feed makes it appear.

AI-detection company Pangram analyzed more than one million posts scanned through its Chrome extension across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, Medium, and Substack. LinkedIn represented approximately one-third of everything scanned, yet produced 62% of all content Pangram flagged as AI-generated.

Read more