Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Ex-workers slam Twitter's double standards when it comes to censoring abuse

Add as a preferred source on Google

Twitter is once again facing scrutiny over its alleged failure to tackle abuse on its platform. The company has now been forced to speak out on its abuse problem not once, but twice in the previous 24 hours.

Firstly, on Wednesday, it shot down rumors that it was shutting down next year due to its incapacity to deal with trolls. Then, on Thursday, it released a public statement denying related allegations made against it in a damning BuzzFeed report.

Recommended Videos

The long-form article details Twitter’s decade-long abuse problem, from the platform’s inception until today, when trolling and persecution has become commonplace. The report touches upon numerous issues that have resulted in the issue of user harassment continually being side-lined by the company. These include failed policy changes, internal chaos within its product management department, and a post-IPO environment built on shifting priorities.

Twitter’s former head of news, Vivian Schiller, sums up the abuse problem as such: “The people that run Twitter … are not stupid. They understand that this toxicity can kill them, but how do you draw the line? Where do you draw the line?”

“I would actually challenge anyone to identify a perfect solution. But it feels to a certain extent that it’s led to paralysis,” adds Schiller.

Former workers also told BuzzFeed that Twitter has double standards when it comes to its treatment of high-profile individuals. Among the examples cited by ex-employees were two cases in particular that occurred under the leadership of former Twitter CEO Dick Costolo.

An outspoken advocate of the company’s commitment to free speech, it is alleged that Costolo secretly employed an algorithm to block abusive language directed at President Obama during a Q&A session on the platform. The same censorship system was again utilized during a similar online event featuring Caitlyn Jenner.

Twitter quickly responded to the article with the following statement on its blog: “In response to today’s BuzzFeed story on safety, we were contacted just last night for comment and obviously had not seen any part of the story until we read it today. We feel there are inaccuracies in the details and unfair portrayals but rather than go back and forth with BuzzFeed, we are going to continue our work on making Twitter a safer place. There is a lot of work to do but please know we are committed, focused, and will have updates to share soon.”

In fact, Twitter has implemented a number of anti-abuse measures this year, including a streamlined blocking process, and the formation of a Trust and Safety Council. However, critics argue that the measures have done little to stem the tide of harassment the platform’s users (in particular women, people of color, and religious minorities) face on a daily basis.

As we know from the recent controversy over Facebook’s trending topics feed, when a popular company — which touts even a small aspect of its platform as being unregulated — is accused of censorship, the resulting backlash can be fierce. Facebook has never flaunted its free speech credentials in the manner that Twitter has, but it was forced to respond several times to the allegations, including a statement from founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

There has been no such reply from Twitter’s leadership, and the firm’s statement simply reiterates what it has always stated on the record. As the criticism reaches fever pitch, though, that may not be the case for much longer.

We reached out to Twitter for a comment but the company did not immediately respond.

Saqib Shah
Saqib Shah is a Twitter addict and film fan with an obsessive interest in pop culture trends. In his spare time he can be…
Meta’s latest courtroom losses expose a potential hole in social media’s strongest defense
Plaintiffs are treating engagement features as deliberately designed products, an argument that could make Section 230 far less useful
facebook

Two jury losses have given plaintiffs momentum against Meta, but they haven’t rewritten the rules for social media. One case relied on New Mexico consumer-protection laws. The other asked a California jury whether addictive design contributed to a young woman’s mental-health issues.

The verdicts, detailed by The Wall Street Journal, reached Meta through different legal routes. Together, they suggest Section 230 becomes a less dependable shield when a lawsuit centers on choices made by the platform itself.

Read more
Meta AI is moving into your Threads DMs, where awkward AI chats belong
Because not every AI conversation deserves a spot on your followers' timeline.
Meta AI in threads DM

One of the reasons Grok AI became so popular is because it let people chat with it directly on X, resulting in some hilarious conversations. And while the public availability of Grok AI on X has resulted in numerous safety issues, there's no denying that this openness played a major role in its rise. 

It seems Meta wanted the same, which became evident when the company started testing Meta AI directly on Threads a few months ago, letting users chat with it right in their feed. But not everyone was comfortable having those conversations out in the open, so Meta has just moved its Meta AI inside your Threads’ DMs. 

Read more
X Money is finally here, and it’s much more than a digital wallet
The new financial service aims to turn X into an app where users can pay, save, spend, and send money.
X Money featured

Elon Musk's vision of turning X into an "everything app" has taken another major step forward. The company has officially begun rolling out X Money to Premium and Premium+ subscribers in the United States. Rather than being just another digital wallet, X Money is designed as a full-fledged financial hub built directly into the social platform, allowing users to send money, receive payments, hold cash, earn interest, and spend through a Visa debit card—all without leaving the X app.

What is X Money, and who is it for?

Read more