Skip to main content

How much do Americans really value their online privacy?

online privacy hma study americans on smartphones
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Do as I say, not as I do appears to be the approach of most Americans when it comes to digital security and privacy. According to a new study from Hide My Ass! (HMA), a global virtual private network provider, U.S. residents seem to maintain a disconnect between their attitudes and their actions when it comes to online behaviors. Despite increasing occurrences of data breaches, hacks, and general security risks on the Internet, consumers still seem to be relatively laissez-faire when it comes to really protecting themselves in the digital arena. In a joint effort with Morar Consulting, HMA found that “while two thirds of respondents say they would like extra layers of online privacy and security, their actions prove otherwise.”

According to study findings, a considerable majority of 63 percent of respondents experienced some sort of online security issues. But despite the frequency of these issues, just over half of them (56 percent) actually made permanent behavior changes to guard against their reoccurrence. 24 percent of respondents admitted to using unsecured public Wi-Fi, meaning that their data is effectively ripe for the picking, “quite often or all the time.” And despite the fact that 67 percent said they wanted extra layers of privacy, a very small percentage actually utilize available tools to this end.

In fact, only 16 percent use privacy-enhancing browser plug-ins, just 13 percent use two-factor authentication, only 11 percent use a VPN, and just 4 percent use anonymity software.

More interesting still, there seems to be some sort of cognitive dissonance when it comes to the safety of physical versus digital information. As HMA discovered, though two thirds of respondents said they were likely to shred paper documents that contain personal information like their Social Security numbers, home address, and birth date, they’re more than willing to post this sort of information online. Fifty-one percent were willing to digitally share their email address, 26 percent would share their home address, and 21 percent would share their personal phone number.

“Even with the NSA revelations and a seemingly endless onslaught of celebrity hacks and public data breaches, Americans still turn a blind eye to their vulnerability online,” said Danvers Baillieu, the chief operating officer of HMA. “While many people say they want to protect themselves online, it is difficult for them to sacrifice things like their level of social presence. For too many, the gratification of a ‘like’ severely outweighs the investment in building a digitally secure life. When it comes to choosing either security or convenience, the latter almost always wins.”

 So is privacy really something we value in the U.S.? Or is just another empty promise? 

Editors' Recommendations

Lulu Chang
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
6 things you should stop doing online

Most of us have been online long enough to know the internet isn’t what it used to be. Under the seemingly seamless experiences and interfaces lies a swarm of invasive and exploitative processes that are built for profit. Every internet company is out there to hunt your data -- just look at how a juggernauts like Facebook have been caught using your data. When it comes to protecting yourself, you are largely on your own.

Over the years, however, we’ve grown used to trusting certain online behavior -- but we can't take them for granted anymore. Here are a few things you should stop doing online.
1. Logging in with Facebook and Google buttons

Read more
Freaked out by the FBI’s smart TV warning? Here’s what you should do
smart tvs not enough to protect us from hackers tv security hacked feature

On November 26, the FBI's Portland, Oregon, office issued a warning about the security risks associated with buying a smart TV. The timing was no doubt meant to offer up some helpful advice right before the American public entered its annual TV buying spree for Black Friday/Cyber Monday. Ironically, the warning wasn't picked up by many news outlets when it was originally issued, which means some consumers may be looking at their new purchases and wondering if they've made a terrible mistake.

At first glance, the concern seems warranted. The FBI warning uses some pretty scary language to describe the potential risk:
Hackers can also take control of your unsecured TV. At the low end of the risk spectrum, they can change channels, play with the volume, and show your kids inappropriate videos. In a worst-case scenario, they can turn on your bedroom TV's camera and microphone and silently cyberstalk you. -- FBI Warning
But before you go rushing to read the fine print of your retailer's return policy, take a breath. Despite the dire nature of the FBI's warning, your actual risks are probably quite low.

Read more
How do you get a Bugatti to 304 mph? Grit, really good tires, and a lot of tech
andy wallace bugatti explain the tech needed to set a speed record ehra lessien front

"It looks easy when you see it," British pilot Andy Wallace told me in disbelief as he watched footage of himself reaching 304 mph in a Bugatti Chiron. He was right; it did look easy. It was almost video game-like. Wallace explained getting there required months of preparation, endless wind tunnel testing, the right tires, and a tremendous amount of tech.

Boasting 16 cylinders, four turbochargers, and 1,600 horsepower, the Bugatti Chiron Super Sport 300+ was developed with speed in mind. Engineers designed every part of the car to cruise faster than a small plane. The record-setting car rode on a stock suspension, according to Wallace, and it used normal brakes. Only the tires had to be upgraded; that's where Michelin stepped in. The company already makes tires for the standard Chiron, so it already knew what it was working with.

Read more