Intel’s new sixth-gen processor provides lower speeds than its older twin

Here is a comparison of the two:

Of course, this table is a watered-down, combined version of the details listed on the individual product pages. But upon close examination each set of hardware specifications, the two processors are identical save for the base clock speeds and the maximum integrated graphics clock speeds. Thus, given that both products feature the same price point, you must wonder why Intel is now offering a new chip at slower speeds for the same cost.

What could be going on here is that Intel is offering notebook manufacturers a solution that saves on the overall battery use. Sure, both parts draw 15 watts of power maximum from the battery, but a slightly lowered clock in computing and rendering can equal to a slightly longer battery life because the chip isn’t hitting that 15-watt ceiling. Then again, a slightly cheaper price point would seemingly be in order for the newer chip. Perhaps Intel hasn’t adjusted the pricing on the older model just yet.

Regardless, just for kicks, here is a bit more on what consumers can expect graphics-wise from a laptop relying on either processor’s internal GPU component:

Editors' Recommendations

• Intel’s budget Core i3-12100 outperformed AMD’s Ryzen 5 3600 in many games
• The iMac M1 is nearly 60% faster than the older Intel model, according to leak
• Upgrading to Intel’s new 11th-gen processors might require a new motherboard