The Martin jetpack, a commercially developed jetpack, may soon be heading to a sky near you.

It is about time man flew among the birds – alone. We may not have the homes on the moon, or the flying cars that our totally reasonable childhood imaginations ensured us would be waiting for us when we grew up, but with a little luck and a lot of money, we might soon be able to scratch “jetpack” off of our bucket lists.

Imagine one day soon, you kiss the spouse good bye, walk the kids off to the school bus, then you prepare for the commute to work. But rather than sitting in traffic and squeezing your steering wheel in frustration as the car in front of you apparently believes the old adage of “speed kills”, so they are driving 15 MPH under the speed limit, you simply throw on your jetpack, terrify a few birds, and make it to work in record time. Sure there might be a few details that you would need to work out, like the practicalities on your hygiene after ripping through the wind with an engine strapped to your back, or the fact that you are betting your life on the reliability of the vehicle, but we are talking about a jetpack- practicalities be damned!

Although it may sound more sci-fi than sci-fact, a commercially developed jetpack is actually being eyed for mass production, with plans to eventually release it to the public. Let that sink in for a second. Jetpacks are real, and you might be able to buy one someday soon. Or at least see them among the skies.

First, it is important to note that these are reusable and maintainable jetpacks, and that while pricey, they could be landing in garages someday soon. There have been jetpacks available to the public- at least in theory- but shy of Evil Knievel, there really wasn’t much call for a device you strapped to your back that shot out flames and had the better-than-average chance of exploding. Not that there were a high instances of the rocket propelled jetpacks blowing up, but it does seem a bit like flicking fate in the eye and daring death to come and get some.

The jetpack in question is being developed by the Martin Aircraft Company which was founded in 1998 and operates out of New Zealand. Despite what may be the oddest coincidence in the aviation community- an industry not typically known for its love of hilarious coincidences- the Martin Aircraft Company was founded by Glenn Neal Martin, not to be confused with Glenn Luther Martin, whose “Glenn L. Martin Company” became the “Martin” in “Lockheed Martin”. In 2003, Martin Aircraft Company received its first round of funding from the Venture capital group, No 8 Ventures, and formed a board of directors with the goal of growing the company through the revenue produced from the Martin jetpack.

Currently Martin Aircraft Company is fulfilling an order for 500 jetpacks to be used by emergency services, as well as four unnamed defense companies. As of right now, the company’s focus is to produce jetpacks specifically for governmental purchase, but they are seeking funding to build at least one new factory with the purpose of producing jetpacks for the average (extremely rich) customer.

The Martin jetpack comes in two models. One is pretty much what you would expect a jetpack to be- it is a device that can carry a person to infinity and beyond, assuming that infinity is less than the 8000 feet ceiling or the 31.5 miles distance that travelling at the maximum regulated speed of 63mph will take you. With a full tank of gas, that would last roughly 30 minutes, although Martin Aircraft expects that to improve as the manufacturing process becomes more efficient. The other model, which will be an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), will be released before its much sexier human-friendly counterpart. Field trials for the UAV will begin in 2011. Depending on the results, the manned flight field trials will begin in 2012.

The jetpack operates the way you would imagine it. You strap it on, you fly. The principles aren’t all that difficult to comprehend. That might be a little bit of an oversimplification, and possibly a touch insulting to the extremely bright and dedicated engineers that have spent years working on the project, but really, how much convincing do you need that a jetpack is a good thing? You put it on, and suddenly you can fly. Everything else is details.

If you are one of “those” people that absolutely needs to know the specs on the combustion engine that you might one day soon be strapping to your back, the Martin jetpack uses a gasoline powered V4, 2.0 liter engine capable of producing 200 hp. In fact, the name “jetpack” is actually a bit of a misnomer, as there is not a jet involved.  But “Enginepack” just isn’t as sexy.  It is a carbon fiber design that weighs around 250lbs before adding safety equipment, and at maximum thrust it can carry more than 600 lbs, so even the bulky NFL player that just signed a multi-million dollar contract extension can get in on the action. Can you honestly see Terrell Owens NOT buying one of these?

The standard equipment for the jetpack is slightly unique. While Ferrari might give you a hat or a lovely keychain when you purchase one of their products, they probably do not include a flight and engine display, a harness, a retractable undercarriage that absorbs energy, or a ballistic parachute. All of which come standard with the Martin Jetpack.

The jetpack is also remarkably convenient for locations where parking might be an issue. Standing 5 feet tall by 5.5 feet wide, with a length of 5ft, in most locations the device is definitely capable of justifying the usage of a “compact” parking spot. These are the specs on the jetpack’s prototype though, so the actual production model will likely undergo some changes.

Many of the specs for the jetpack are regulated by FAA restrictions, including the 5 gallon fuel tank and the areas that the vehicle can legally operate. The FAA does not require that pilots- or “rocketeers”- file a flight plan before ripping off into the heavens. How the police or an FAA official would be able to catch pilots that fail to file a flight plan is unknown, but odds are they would find a way.

Currently the Martin jetpack is classified as a recreational vehicle, but it is restricted to non-urban airspaces- at least for now. While this is obviously a problem for the future, once a few senators and congress people hover over the capital for an hour or two, those laws might be changed. The current statutes are sadly lacking in their understanding of the awesome potential for a jetpack, but given enough public groundswell from the potential customer base for these vehicles- i.e., those rich enough to spend $100,000 of a vehicle that can only be used in the country- the pressure to change the existing laws could quickly mount.

In a world that values safety, sometimes you have to approach things with a “what the hell” mentality. Sure, a functional jetpack might not be the most practical way to spend $100,000, but if the choice is between a $100,000 Bentley with a custom made sound system and chrome rims, or a device that can make a human being fly, jetpack > Bentley. Search your feelings, you know it to be true.

To be fair, these jetpacks are not being marketed towards the average consumer any more than you might expect to find a 5-karat diamond advertised on NBC’s Primetime TV lineup. And while there may be something of a personal stake among the ultra rich as to who will be the first to arrive at the end of summer party in the Hamptons in their chromed-out Martin jetpack, the first people to have the chance to pimp their jetpacks will be emergency workers, and others that will use the jetpacks for “responsible” pursuits.

Assuming the first few owners don’t die horribly, it also seems like there will be a high likelihood of these vehicles making their way to high-end rental destinations. If that happens and the legal hurdles are overcome, it is not only possible, but inevitable that while the streets of Las Vegas will be crowded with expensive rental cars, the skies will also see their fair share of occupants.

The timeline for the productions of these jetpacks is still up in the air due to funding, so no word yet on when we might finally be able to take the fight to those birds that have been lauding it over us for millennia, or when we might expect a heroic person to get caught up in events beyond his or her control and end up with a prototype Martin Jetpack that they will then use to fight crime and Nazis, or whatever.

So while we may still be a few years off before we can justify getting really excited by the prospects of a working jetpack, it does seem like gravity, that cruel and fickle mistress that has been keeping us down for years, might finally get its comeuppance as we break free of our earthly restraints and finally take to the skies.


Other articles you might be interested in:

Futuristic sci-fi gadgets, available today

Silicon Diamonds in the Rough: Unheralded Tech Advances for 2010

The Future of Smartphones: 2010-2015 and Beyond

Car Audio 2.0: Listen to Pandora, MP3s and iPods in Your Car

Showing 23 comments

  1. Brittany at 2:07pm 11th October 2010 Haha this really interesting.. jet "pack" :)
  2. Franco at 10:13am 7th October 2010 Can you imagine a cop pulling you over and as you calmly walk waay from him, he has the choice of going after you and losing his man-toy or calling for a "foot" patrol as backup.... What happens when two good old boys play chicken over a housing area and "blam" two red necks crash into your back yard.... How many thousands of UFO sightings will be reported?
  3. BizarreSubpar at 10:56am 6th October 2010 Ha! Fox News ran a story about the Martin Jetpack, and how the LAPD were buying 10,000 units, but sourced the WEEKLY WORLD NEWS! http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/10/fox...
    1. benz reading at 6:12pm 6th October 2010 tax dollars hard at work
      1. BizarreSubpar at 9:01pm 6th October 2010 The Weekly World News is the "news site" that reports things like Batboy and UFOs. It is a tabloid and proud of it. Sourcing them would be like CNN sourcing The Onion.
  4. A.aspinall at 11:03pm 4th October 2010 I think it's really cool, maybe one day everyone will be able to have their own personal jet pack. Who knows, maybe they will take the place of cars someday.
  5. RocketMan at 9:21pm 4th October 2010 New Corvette...or new JetPack? hmmmm
  6. Jason at 9:11pm 4th October 2010 http://www.futurehorizons.net/jetpacks.htm They are only selling plans at the moment, but they were selling the built version for 15K If memory serves correctly
  7. Vanessa Enriquez at 9:08pm 4th October 2010 Ah that looks pretty awesome! reminds me on the type of cool stuff that comes out in movies
  8. Samantha Kesselman at 6:38pm 4th October 2010 That is so cool! I would love to own one of those. I always considered them to be something of the future, but i guess the future is sooner than i thought!
  9. Ryan at 4:47pm 4th October 2010 I would love to finance these at my Dealership!
  10. abe at 1:26pm 4th October 2010 how is blood flow to the legs during 30 min. flight???
  11. @Rholtslander at 12:00pm 4th October 2010 I think calling it a jet "pack" is ridiculous. A pack implies portability. This is plainly not portable except when it's activated. It's so huge you'd need a truck to hall it around by the looks of it. A more apt name would be personal flying machine although not as evocative.
  12. Tim at 11:32am 4th October 2010 It's all fun and games until the designer flies off of a cliff.
  13. mike at 9:26am 4th October 2010 If you need a 6' 220 lb. test pilot I am available.
  14. sully at 6:28am 1st October 2010 That looks AWESOME! I want to try!!! I've heard of ballistic missles, but not "ballistic parachutes"... Sounds like a jet fighter type rocket launched eject system? Or, just a really bad idea... ballistic parachute hmmm
  15. Dingus at 9:50am 29th September 2010 $100K from Martin today, $9999 from China in 2015. 30 min flying time is great, but not nearly long enough (for me). For us motorcycle riders who dream about stuff like this, it needs to have a 200-mile range (min) and a much higher top speed (say, 120mph), perhaps using the pilot in an airfoil suit or some such to increase aerodynamics. And a 2.0 liter V4? Hello? A Suzuki GSX-R 1000 (1 liter) engine can make nearly as much power with a lot less weight. It's great to see Martin kick this thing off but if it takes off as a hobby, expect to see Honda and other motorcycle makers get into the fray and up the performance a LOT while bringing down the price as well. Cool stuff!
    1. Richard at 2:06pm 30th September 2010 The difference between the Martin Jetpack Engine and a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 is that our engine has to run constantly at 90% of full power to maintain flight thrust. Motorbikes just don't operate like that. So our engine design, and the cooling sytem, is matched to the application - constant 170hp - 200hp for 30 minutes with high reliability. And if Honda wants to get in touch - we are looking for a cornerstone investor and distribution partner right now. I hope you can a least try out a Martin Jetpack one day. I can assure you it is very exciting. Richard Martin AIrcraft Company
      1. Rotorjim at 9:20pm 3rd October 2010 For over fifty years these "Captain Gadgets" machines come and go. Even with modern digital technology, accelerometers, gyro stabilizers etc etc. Then propose that production units made available are going to cost in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. This always does and always will kill the concept and reality. You can never succeed if your product’s complete production ,tooling and R&D expenses are attempted to be recouped in the first two sold units. You need financial backers who will be patient enough and smart enough to risk to offer the product at a price that a real users would pay so that you amortize your tooling and production cost over time. Then it can become a reality. Very few individuals have the monetary assets that a military research budget has. So it will disappear as did all the rest. Think about it, Ford motor company doesn’t sell it’s F-150 pickups for the price of all the stamping dies, welders, foundries and other infrastructure in the first two pickups of the model line. They amortize these expenses over hundreds of thousands of vehicles. Obviously there is no such sizeable market for these but the principal of marketing is the same. Good luck in your endeavors.
      2. Dingus at 11:41am 8th October 2010 Richard, thanks for the response. I hear what you are saying about he need for 90% power on a long-term basis. Certainly, street bikes don't operate under those conditions - even racebikes don't even though they could likely take the strain. I'm sure the legal hurdles are lofty (sorry) for getting this to be a consumer product, and I wish you the best. And I volunteer to be a test pilot! It would be nice if a company like Honda got involved, they do make a jet as I'm sure you are aware. I hope Martin continues with product development to make future versions lighter, more efficient, more reliable and more responsive. If this technology could ever be made affordable and reliable (safe) enough, I can certainly see people like myself and many other motorcyclists, skydivers and pilots stepping up to fly the way man was meant to - without a cage. I wish you the best.
  16. Dave at 9:31am 29th September 2010 Bentley's start at about 200k. 100k is a steal!
  17. Marten at 7:17am 29th September 2010 NOw thats really cool but why dont they put a seat under the pilots bud. It looks pretty incomfortable.
    1. Jordan at 9:17am 29th September 2010 Maybe because of weight? But it does look like that machine ways a tonne!
Close Suggestion H20 Surge 2G Headphones: sweat proof and waterproof
View Article