Skip to main content

Apple should have been awarded an injunction against Samsung, says federal appeals court

Tim Cook
Image used with permission by copyright holder
If you’re hearing loud cheers today, it’s probably from Cupertino. Apple received a victory today in its long, drawn-out legal war with Samsung.

There are a couple of major cases involving the two companies, but today’s decision is in relation to a ruling from May 2014 that Samsung infringed on Apple’s patents involving slide-to-unlock, autocorrect, and autolink features. Apple was awarded $120 million, but U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh denied an injunction in August 2014 that would stop Samsung from selling any products that use the features. Her reasoning was that the $120 million settlement was good enough. Apple appealed and argued that Samsung stole those features, and therefore, had no right to continue to use them.

Fast forward to today and a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that an injunction should have been awarded, and the lower court abused its discretion in failing to do so. Unfortunately for Apple, this does not mean the company was actually awarded an injunction today. It just means that this case will be sent back to the U.S District Court that refused to issue the injunction to reconsider its ruling.

The Court of Appeals said in its 2-1 decision, “The right to exclude competitors from using one’s property rights is important and the right to maintain exclusivity — a hallmark and crucial guarantee of patent rights deriving from the Constitution itself -— is likewise important.”

Samsung had the backing of Google, HTC, LG, and Rackspace Hosting, but it wasn’t good enough. The companies argued that an Apple victory could allow a patent owner to “to unfairly leverage its patent for competitive gain.”

Furthermore, Samsung told the Court of Appeals that none of its current models uses slide-to-unlock or autocorrect, and only one product uses the autolink feature.

So why is Apple spending all sorts of money to keep this one alive? A win probably won’t force Samsung to make many changes, but it could set a precedent for future patents that Apple owns. Many believe that companies shouldn’t be allowed to patent common-sense software features. Awarding too many patents could cause unnecessary resources to be spent in the legal system rather than on innovation.

Let’s also not forget that Apple and Samsung have another blockbuster case ongoing. Apple already won that one in 2012 when a court ruled that Samsung copied the design of the iPhone. Apple was awarded $1 billion, but the Federal Circuit reduced it to $548 million in May. However, the final amount still needs to be determined by a trial limited to the issue of damages.

Editors' Recommendations

Robert Nazarian
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Robert Nazarian became a technology enthusiast when his parents bought him a Radio Shack TRS-80 Color. Now his biggest…
Apple AirPods vs. Samsung Galaxy Buds: Which Prime Day deal is better?
Samsung Galaxy Buds+ hands-on on table

Apple kicked off the true wireless revolution with its excellent AirPods (not to mention the controversial removal of 3.5mm audio jacks from its iPhones), but it didn't take long for other brands to join the fray. Samsung gave its answer to Apple with its excellent Galaxy Buds, which are a great choice for non-iOS users and anyone else looking for a good alternative to AirPods. Both Apple AirPods and Samsung Galaxy Buds are on sale for this year's Prime Day deals, but if you're left wondering which of the two is the better bargain, read on.

Outside of sales, you can generally expect the Samsung Galaxy Buds, which retail for $130, to provide a better value than Apple's AirPods, which carry a $160 price tag for the version with the non-wireless charging case. That shouldn't come as a huge shock to techies who already know that Apple gadgets tend to come at a premium. Our review team found the Galaxy Buds to sound a bit better than the AirPods, and they also come standard with a wireless charging case that you can use with Qi charging pads.

Read more
Apple Watch Series 6 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch 3
Apple Watch 6 fitness

The Apple Watch Series 6 is here, and it shows Apple is taking an even greater focus on personal health with their best smartwatch. It introduces a new blood oxygen level sensor that can measure your O2 levels even while you sleep, as well as an always-on altimeter for the hikers among us. Combined with a brighter always-on display and quirky new watch faces, it goes one step further than the Series 5 in offering a comprehensive health-and-fitness tracker that doubles as a very usable smartwatch.

It's not the only new smartwatch in town, however. Samsung released its Galaxy Watch 3 in August, and it's every bit as good as you'd expect a smartwatch from Samsung to be. It takes a more classical watch approach to its design, while adding a nifty rotating bezel that makes using its features as effortless as possible.

Read more
Camera shootout: Can Huawei’s P40 Pro Plus beat Apple, Samsung, and Google?
huawei p40 pro plus vs apple iphone 11 samsung galaxy s20 ultra google pixel 4 camera shootout

The Huawei P40 Pro Plus is the most technically advanced camera phone Huawei has produced yet, and has an even more capable zoom lens system than the P40 Pro, which aced a recent test against the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra. Now that the P40 Pro Plus is on the scene, we have given it an even harder test.

Here, it takes on the current best camera phone you can buy, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro, along with its nemesis the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, and the always superb Google Pixel 4. This is as tough as camera phone tests get. Here’s how the newcomer performs against the stiffest competition we could find.
The cameras
Before we get to the photos, here are the camera specs for each contender.

Read more