Skip to main content

FCC: Wireless signal boosters are no longer allowed unless approved by your carrier

fcc-boosters
Image used with permission by copyright holder

There are few things more dreadful than going through the trouble of buying a cell phone only to find out that you have no service in your home or business. To combat this issue, millions of Americans have been using signal boosters to give their phones an edge where they need it. Not anymore, though. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)  is saying no more to signal boosters unless you get the written consent of your mobile carrier.

In an updated notice and FAQ, the FCC has made a statement with new rules regarding the usage of consumer wireless signal boosters in homes, RVs, boats, and other places where wireless signals can often be weak. In the new rules, the FCC explicitly requires you to register your device, get the consent of your wireless carrier to use a wireless signal booster, and use only approved antennas and other equipment. Before these new rules, any average Joe could set up his own signal booster without any consent from carriers or registration requirements. At this point, anyone using a signal booster with consent or registration is also being asked to turn it off until you receive such consent. If you don’t turn it off, the FCC or your wireless carrier may be giving you a call in the near future.

The FCC says the reason for such new strict rules is to ensure that signal boosters in place already will not interfere too much with current wireless coverage, as signal boosters can interfere with other signals from getting through. It makes sense,  as you wouldn’t want entire network deployments by major carriers to be affected negatively by individual homes and their signal boosters. However, the new policies were certainly not written in favor of consumers, as carriers are now the new gatekeepers for signal boosters, and instead may ask customers to opt for “Air Raves” signal boosters and other pay-per-month services carriers sell to enhance your wireless signal.

The new rules do not seem to apply for Wi-Fi signal boosters, only those related to wireless carriers.

Editors' Recommendations

Joshua Sherman
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Joshua Sherman is a contributor for Digital Trends who writes about all things mobile from Apple to Zynga. Josh pulls his…
The 4 best Whoop alternatives in 2024
Someone wearing a Whoop 4.0 and an Apple Watch Ultra 2.

If you’ve been looking for a top-shelf fitness tracker, one of the best brands in the business is Whoop. Having developed quite the reputation over the years, professional athletes and everyday gym-goers are glad to stand behind Whoop’s advanced tracking capabilities, and so are we! But Whoop equipment doesn’t come cheap. That’s why it’s always good to have alternatives when you’re shopping for a new consumer tech device.

To that end, your pals at Digital Trends have got you covered. As experts on health and fitness gear, we’ve gone ahead and rounded up the four best Whoop alternatives to track your workouts in 2024.

Read more
The 6 best Apple Watch alternatives in 2024
Person adjusting Garmin Forerunner 965 on their wrist.

Smartwatches are powerful companions for our smartphones, offering quick access to messages and fitness tracking stats. The Apple Watch lineup is filled with many of the most popular smartwatches of 2024, as they're easy to use, loaded with features, and highly customizable. But if you own an Android phone – or simply don't like the Apple Watch design – you'll be glad to know there are several Apple Watch alternatives for you to choose from.

Ready to find a companion for your wrist? Here are the six best Apple Watch alternatives of 2024. This includes premium fitness trackers like the Garmin Forerunner 965 and the stylish Withings ScanWatch 2. For more great options, check out our roundup of the best smartwatches.

Read more
There’s something Apple isn’t telling you about the new iPad Pro
A render of the front and back of the 2024 iPad Pro.

Earlier this year, I bought a new MacBook Air. It was the entry-level 13-inch trim with an eight-core graphics engine. If my budget allowed, I would’ve loved to go with the higher-end M3 version with a 10-core GPU inside.

Spending a few hundred dollars for the higher RAM and storage configuration automatically gets you the more powerful M3 variant. Conversely, you can’t just pay more for an M3 version with a beefier GPU. If you want the best performance possible, you have to pay for the higher storage/RAM models. It’s an infuriating and darn expensive situation, but that’s how Apple rolls.

Read more