Skip to main content

Vine blocking NSFW content, hopes Apple doesn’t find its porn stash

vine censorIt seems that Vine is determined to pretend that the Web wasn’t made for porn. After bringing the Internet practically to its knees with news that one of its editors liked a six-second pornographic video, the young platform is now doing all it can to block searches for NSFW content.

Our collective panic comes only four days after Vine’s illustrious debut in the App Store, as many wondered if this was the next big thing. This morning, however, things took a turn when Vine users were greeted with an explicit video featuring a woman and a sex toy at the top of Vine’s Editor’s Picks. Sacre bleu! Twitter, quick to defend its budding new social platform, blamed “human error” for the video surfacing and quickly deleted it. However, the damage was done, and Vine has since gone into damage control-mode to prevent content containing tags like “porn,” “nsfw,” and “nsfwvine” from popping up in any searches.

In truth, no one should have been surprised. Vine’s users were simply abiding by Rule 34: If it exists, there’s probably a porn version of it. However, what’s most upsetting about the slip is that all users were exposed to the video – we’re talking children, t00 – and that puts the app squarely in violation of Apple’s stringent App Store regulations. Thus, Vine’s developers were forced to self-censor content in a way that smacks of puritanical shaming so they won’t have to the app being pulled from the store outright.

Apple, for its part, was likely beside itself when news broke. Though Vine is still very much active in the App Store, it is no longer being actively promoted in the Editor’s Picks section. Apple’s own policy on pornography is as rigid as it is inconsistent. Apple only recently booted popular photography app 500px for displaying nudity, though apps like Tumblr (which is a hotbed for porn-lovers) and even Snapchat are alive and well.

We’ll keep you updated as the story unfolds. Or undresses? Either way, stay tuned.

Editors' Recommendations

Kwame Opam
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kwame graduated from Stony Brook University with BA in Anthropology and has a Masters in Media Studies. He's done stints at…
Apple’s 5G dominance with the iPhone 12 shows connectivity alone doesn’t sell
iphone 12 image

The iPhone 12 series lands at the top of the smartphone price range. With its debut, Apple somewhat arrogantly announced on stage along with Verizon that "5G just got real.: It was right. The iPhone 12 may have come later than 5G phones from Xiaomi, OnePlus, and even Samsung -- and it definitely costs a lot more than those others -- but now Apple dominates in the 5G sales market.

Apple shipped 40.7% of all 5G phones in the last four months of 2020.

Read more
We really hope Apple doesn’t add MagSafe to everything, but fear it will
magsafe charger illustration

Somewhere deep inside the Apple campus, and in Apple accessory makers' offices around the world, teams of conceptual artists, engineers, and designers are likely working hard to bring the next wave of MagSafe products to life. MagSafe products, like the MagSafe leather wallet, have been mostly underwhelming so far, but they have been restricted to the iPhone. But what if they weren't. What if MagSafe spread to other Apple products?

It got us thinking about what items we didn’t want to see evolve from Apple’s MagSafe range, but that we fear someone, somewhere may be working on anyway. It’s best to get these worries out in the open, but we recommend you don’t take the following fictional list lightheartedly. Take it as a warning.
MagSafe folio for iPad
No one will use a MagSafe Wallet for the iPad (right? Right?), but the back of the tablet has a lot of temptingly flat aluminum going to waste. The MagSafe Folio for the iPad wouldn’t take your credit cards, but instead be a place for those important papers that otherwise would get screwed up and forgotten about at the bottom of your bag, or worse, sent to recycling.

Read more
Report says Apple doesn’t secure iCloud backups because the FBI asked it not to
Sign in to iCloud

Apple has been caught in a public tussle with the government over unlocking iPhones of suspects in investigations far too many times but the company has invariably sided with its privacy principles refusing to budge and offer access. Behind the scenes, however, Apple may have been a lot more obliging with U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies.

A new Reuters report claims Apple backtracked on its plan to end-to-end encrypt iPhone owners’ iCloud backups after the FBI, citing that the move would harm investigations, hounded it not to go ahead with it two years ago.

Read more